- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LA Supreme Court rules that Ed Orgeron's ex-wife deserves $8 million from LSU buyout
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:10 pm to luciouslou
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:10 pm to luciouslou
quote:
8 mil is nothing to that man
How much money do you think his dumb arse has?
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:20 pm to Forever
quote:
8 mil is nothing to that man
How much money do you think his dumb arse has? he probably doesn’t even have $8mm in the bank
just did a little ciphering, ball park figures, mind you:
between the Fed IRS, La IRS, and Uberstein, O paid just under eight million before he ever put a shrimp smelling finger on the seventeen million dollar payoff
ETA: not to mention attorney fees, for both parties more than likely
This post was edited on 6/27/25 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:21 pm to WaterLink
quote:
I've heard some people say Kelly started doing drugs or something but not sure how true that is.
i have it on good authority it was pain pills and lots of them.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:23 pm to WaterLink
quote:
Then it seemed like very abruptly in the offseason they're divorced and photos of him naked in bed with that blonde start circulating. I've heard some people say Kelly started doing drugs or something but not sure how true that is.
I heard the pain killer rumor too, due to back problems. I also heard she was scissoring a neighbor rumor before the pain killer rumor.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:23 pm to mpwilging
quote:
This may get appealed
Thank God me and mine dont live in Louisiana anymore. Wow.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:24 pm to WaterLink
quote:
Speaking of his wife
She's very eligible right now!
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:24 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:
Thank God me and mine dont live in Louisiana anymore. Wow.
don't get a divorce in Palm Beach County, Florida baw
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:28 pm to PUB
Still legally married, so yes. Still have $8 million? Probably not, that blonde likely snatched it up.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:31 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
just did a little ciphering, ball park figures, mind you:
between the Fed IRS, La IRS, and Uberstein, O paid just under eight million before he ever put a shrimp smelling finger on the seventeen million dollar payoff
ETA: not to mention attorney fees, for both parties more than likely
Question: if the taxes have been paid on it already, will O still have to pay the full $8 mil to Kelly? That's kinda fricked if he pays $8 mil in taxes for the full $17 mil and then has to pay the full $8 mil to Kelly. Would Kelly then have to pay taxes on the $8 mil, essentially double taxing it?
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:33 pm to WaterLink
quote:
if the taxes have been paid on it already,
don't know about La law, but in some states yes, he owes her the gross amount
quote:
That's kinda fricked
absolutely fricked
quote:
Would Kelly then have to pay taxes on the $8 mil, essentially double taxing it?
in Florida, at least at the time of my divorce he would
ETA: I think if it is classified as income he may not owe the gross amount and she would have the taxes already paid deducted(50%) of her portion of the $17million
This post was edited on 6/27/25 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:35 pm to Chicken
quote:
oh no...things aren't so rosy for the Rosy Finch Boyz...
This seems like an overlooked aspect. He funneled all his revenue through that LLC which the wife presumably owned half.
O didn’t negotiate a buyout, the Rosy Finch Boyz, LLC. negotiated it.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:35 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
not legally divorced, or if the deal was in the works before dissolution the courts will always side in the favor of the one in possession of the vagina
The vagina didn't help for Brittany Spears
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:37 pm to mdomingue
quote:
The vagina didn't help for Brittany Spears
don't know much about that one but didn't she marry one of the hired help and she had everything and he had nothing? if so, she probably got off paying peanuts
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:37 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
don't know about La law, but in some states yes, he owes her the gross amount
That would leave him with essentially nothing out of that buyout. Wow that's unbelievably fricked if that's how it's going to play out. And people wonder why marriage rates have declined so much over the years.
quote:
I think if it is classified as income he may not owe the gross amount and she would have the taxes already paid deducted(50%) of there portion of the $17million
OK this at least makes a little more logical sense.
This post was edited on 6/27/25 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:39 pm to WaterLink
quote:
That would leave him with essentially nothing out of that buyout. Wow that's unbelievably fricked if that's how it's going to play out. And people wonder why marriage rates have declined so much over the years.
when it comes to family court the judges almost unilaterally side with the woman, and the bigger the deadbeat she is, the better the ruling
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:42 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:Dealing with something similar right now. Luckily, we're still at the district level, so there are plenty of people to appeal to
It was a pretty big judgment. It was based on a rather interesting interpretation of liability (on a statute that had just changed). The client was the State of Louisiana. There was no one else to appeal to.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:42 pm to PUB
Hopefully the Golden Nugget in LC revised their 2025 forecast to account for this happening as Ed is expected to spend much less there now that this is final
This post was edited on 6/27/25 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:45 pm to WaterLink
quote:
Would Kelly then have to pay taxes on the $8 mil, essentially double taxing it?
Alimony isn’t taxable anymore to the recipient so no she wouldn’t
Alimony is also non-dischargable in bankruptcy so Ed may have to start liquidating some assets. No way he has that in the bank anymore
This post was edited on 6/27/25 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:47 pm to PUB
LA Supeeme Court are some cuck bitch arse mfers
Posted on 6/27/25 at 2:47 pm to Big4SALTbro
quote:
fricked up by the court to give her 8M. She was out of the picture by then
déteste le jeu, pas le joueur
Popular
Back to top


1









