- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyren Lacy’s attorney issues new statement in support of DA
Posted on 10/6/25 at 12:27 pm to Vacherie Saint
Posted on 10/6/25 at 12:27 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
by Vacherie saint
I have seen you post in just about all of these threads about him tearing down your city…maybe you should look at the LSP and put your anger there.
The lawyer is doing what he was hired to do.
The LSP are the ones that seem to have let most people down here.
Or let me know what I am missing with this story.
It seems to be all over the place
This post was edited on 10/6/25 at 12:32 pm
1
Posted on 10/6/25 at 12:40 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Kia Cadenza whose driver swerved left to avoid the on coming Dodge Charger.
This statement is making it sound like KL was closer to the accident site/gold truck/Funyuns than he was.
Everyone is seeming to forget that KL's car had brakes too. The explanation of what happened grew legs.
It had been said that KL passed the accident scene twice. He didn't according to the video.
He also didn't "flee the scene" as that implies that he sped off to get away. Looks to me like he just drove around the crash as did the white SUV that was between him and the marine.
I still think he was overcharged.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 12:57 pm to WHATDOINO
quote:
Or let me know what I am missing with this story.
It’s simple. If all you do is take a sleazy personal injury lawyer’s word for it, you might think there’s some grand, racist conspiracy to jail an innocent black man. But a good question to ask yourself is, if he has evidence of police or DA misconduct, why isn’t he filing a lawsuit on behalf of the family? Why is he tainting a potential jury pool? Why is he now walking back comments he made about the DAs office? If a subsequent independent investigation run by the DA confirmed the police’s conclusion as he’s claimed in his most recent statement, than how can he simultaneously claim Lacy’s innocence? Just use simple logic here.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:03 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
sleazy personal injury lawyer
Ory firm does more than PI, including criminal defense and maritime.
Even if it didn't, why are you calling him sleazy? Kyren begged him to help him.
Are you against Kyren's name being cleared?
Have you never driven stupid? I have. I hit a car head on when I was 23. I was trying to get around a slower car on Highland just past Siegen and I misjudged the whole thing.
Kyren drove stupid and so did Funyuns. Both should have fault.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:06 pm to Dizz
quote:
The lawyer is putting carefully edited footage all over the media right now
The State Police have the entire video that they are free to release whenever they want. There was clearly an issue with the investigation from LSP I am not sure why so many are unable to comprehend that idea.
The truth is the truth. That's what matters.
But, I tend to agree with him that taking what the attorney for Lacy says as 100% gospel is probably a mistake. A lot of people are doing that. A lot of people have just ignored when Lacy was in the opposite lane and when he wasn't.
That doesn't mean State Police didn't make a mistake or do something wrong.
And, it doesn't mean that the woman who was involved didn't do something very wrong as well.
My best guess of the situation based on what has been revealed is that Lacy forced the truck in front of the woman to brake because he was in the wrong lane...and the lady wasn't paying attention so her braking to prevent a collision with the truck was impossible...and then she made a bad/deadly decision to veer into oncoming traffic.
Lacy probably wasn't completely innocent. He had passed 4 cars as I understand it. He was probably driving aggressively. He was probably speeding. But, his actions probably should not have resulted into a head on collision.
That's my guess as of now.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:10 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
making a 4 car pass right there is stupid and was ultimately the lynchpin for the accident.
I don’t know about that.
If tailgating woman eating Funyuns was paying attention, following appropriately and slowed down prior to 0.5 seconds before impact she doesn’t hit anyone.
I’d say the person that hit the victim was the “lynchpin” of the accident.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:11 pm to Red Stick Tigress
Cool, But that’s not what he’s saying, is it?
He’s claiming complete innocence and publicly accusing the police of misconduct. If that’s the case, sue someone. But he won’t. Why is that?
He’s claiming complete innocence and publicly accusing the police of misconduct. If that’s the case, sue someone. But he won’t. Why is that?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:13 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
if he has evidence of police or DA misconduct, why isn’t he filing a lawsuit on behalf of the family?
Based on the body cam footage I’d say that’s comin’
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:15 pm to Adam Banks
Well, if that’s the plan he just fricked himself by doing what he did.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:15 pm to moneyg
quote:
The truth is the truth. That's what matters. But, I tend to agree with him that taking what the attorney for Lacy says as 100% gospel is probably a mistake. A lot of people are doing that.
The data is the data.
The Kia didn’t slow down until 0.5 seconds before impact.
That speaks to someone who dropped a funyun looked down to pick it up and looked up about to have a wreck and swerved.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:16 pm to Red Stick Tigress
He was 100% overcharged. LSP needs to be held accountable, he should have been cleared of any criminal charges much sooner. No reason for the thing to ever go as far as it did.
But also things have swung too far the other way on social media now. Originally most people assumed Kyren was guilty and drug his name through the mud. Now the majority of people are acting like he had NO FAULT whatsoever. He passed 4 cars in a no passing zone, that feat requires a very high rate of speed on a dangerous part of road. That was the original catalyst that led to the accident. Not worthy of a criminal charge, but reckless for sure.
And the saddest part is he was someone who suffered from some form of mental illness including impulse control problems, so this whole event led the young man to take his own life. But once again, that is no one else's fault either. He didn't have to do that, he almost definitely would have been cleared of the criminal charges at some point and still would have had a shot at an NFL career. The young man was battling his own demons and lost unfortunately.
But also things have swung too far the other way on social media now. Originally most people assumed Kyren was guilty and drug his name through the mud. Now the majority of people are acting like he had NO FAULT whatsoever. He passed 4 cars in a no passing zone, that feat requires a very high rate of speed on a dangerous part of road. That was the original catalyst that led to the accident. Not worthy of a criminal charge, but reckless for sure.
And the saddest part is he was someone who suffered from some form of mental illness including impulse control problems, so this whole event led the young man to take his own life. But once again, that is no one else's fault either. He didn't have to do that, he almost definitely would have been cleared of the criminal charges at some point and still would have had a shot at an NFL career. The young man was battling his own demons and lost unfortunately.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:17 pm to Adam Banks
Right. She was reacting to the vehicle in front of her baling off the road, not Lacy. That’s how chain of events work in traffic law.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:19 pm to moneyg
quote:
But, I tend to agree with him that taking what the attorney for Lacy says as 100% gospel is probably a mistake. A lot of people are doing that. A lot of people have just ignored when Lacy was in the opposite lane and when he wasn't.
It's not taking what the attorney says as gospel. It's seeing the video of the accident and LSP discussion with the other driver. You can acknowledge that he was likely driving aggressively but that did not directly cause the woman to not pay attention and swerve into the wrong lane.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:19 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
publicly accusing the police of misconduct. If that’s the case, sue someone. But he won’t. Why is that?
I think the body cam footage is leading the witness to make certain statements. I also wonder what was said to have the witness REFUSE to sign.
Ory can't sue. The family has to be the plaintiffs.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:20 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
The data is the data.
The Kia didn’t slow down until 0.5 seconds before impact.
That speaks to someone who dropped a funyun looked down to pick it up and looked up about to have a wreck and swerved.
So, you agree with my "best guess".
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:21 pm to Vacherie Saint
“Lynchpin” implies that he is the critical person in the events.
He is not.
The critical person is the person who was not paying attention and hit another car.
Kyren Lacy could have been a deer, a piece of debris in the road, a kid running into the road, etc etc etc.
The end result would have been the same.
If you could replace Lacy and his charger with a number of other things causing the gold truck to brake then he is not the critical piece.
He is not.
The critical person is the person who was not paying attention and hit another car.
Kyren Lacy could have been a deer, a piece of debris in the road, a kid running into the road, etc etc etc.
The end result would have been the same.
If you could replace Lacy and his charger with a number of other things causing the gold truck to brake then he is not the critical piece.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:24 pm to moneyg
Absolutely agree with your best guess.
I just disagree with the notion that people are taking the attorneys argument as “gospel”
They are just interpreting the data the only way it is reasonable to interpret.
As for the LSP “not doing anything wrong” I don’t know how you could watch the body cam footage and think they were going into the situation with an open mind. I would think trying to find the truth rather than forcing their preconceived narrative would be “doing something wrong” particularly when it comes to destroying someone’s reputation and livelihood.
I just disagree with the notion that people are taking the attorneys argument as “gospel”
They are just interpreting the data the only way it is reasonable to interpret.
As for the LSP “not doing anything wrong” I don’t know how you could watch the body cam footage and think they were going into the situation with an open mind. I would think trying to find the truth rather than forcing their preconceived narrative would be “doing something wrong” particularly when it comes to destroying someone’s reputation and livelihood.
This post was edited on 10/6/25 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:26 pm to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
The family has to be the plaintiffs.
The family's attorney is publicly accusing the police of framing his client. If there's a case, they should want a civil suit, right? Want to bet they dont?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:29 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
He’s claiming complete innocence and publicly accusing the police of misconduct. If that’s the case, sue someone. But he won’t. Why is that?
A suit against the LSP would be a hail mary minus some smoking gun of direct misconduct and not just a lazy investigation. There is still more time to file and they may file months from now.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:29 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
He's a fame whore trying to make a name for himself.
If he really wants to litigate this, he needs to file a civil suit on behalf of the family and do this in court. Not on HTV.
That's coming bud. A civil suit relies on a jury and putting all the evidence out there to the public us the first step, because if they waited until the trial the state police could argue for a gag order due to the public nature and public figure in the trial so it won't sway a jury. The state attorney can't argue as to what evidence is relevant right now, but they can when a case is filed. Playing chess not checkers here.
Page 4 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News