- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: K. Lacy wanted on negligent homicide and hit and run
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:13 pm to beerJeep
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:13 pm to beerJeep
quote:Tiger_Stomp is either dumb beyond help or is related to Lacy and trying to cope with this tragedy with ignorance and victim blaming. Very sad.
And yet…. What are you doing here?
1
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:13 pm to zuluboudreaux
Looking through unbiased lenses. Read read read, break it down. You drive your car into someone else and cause them to die and you say “because”. You, you, you have some accountability. True lacy may have contributed to some a part of the situation but “you” the driver decided to make the decision that ended your life.
I would have just braked, and any other clear headed individual would have braked instead of SWERVING AND KILLING MYSELF AND OTHER INDIVIDUALS.
So its ok for you to disregard the law because someone else is doing it? Answer the question.
If lacy was driving in wrong lane stop and allow lacy to hit you but nowhere does a logically thinking person or the law state that you should brake the law (swerving into other lane) because an erratic driver is breaking the law.
Clear and simple.
I would have just braked, and any other clear headed individual would have braked instead of SWERVING AND KILLING MYSELF AND OTHER INDIVIDUALS.
So its ok for you to disregard the law because someone else is doing it? Answer the question.
If lacy was driving in wrong lane stop and allow lacy to hit you but nowhere does a logically thinking person or the law state that you should brake the law (swerving into other lane) because an erratic driver is breaking the law.
Clear and simple.
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:14 pm to Tiger_Stomp
quote:
Looking through unbiased lenses.
Says the guy who is randomly calling the victim who lost his life a drunk driver.
quote:
Clear and simple.
You’re fricking retarded.
This post was edited on 1/10/25 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:15 pm to Mouth
quote:Read it closer
Sure seems like it happened behind him from the news story.
quote:He passed at least one other car before the other southbound car that got run into. He was either still behind or not clear of that car. The wreck happened in front of or right next to him, and because of him.
Louisiana State Police allege Lacy was driving a 2023 Dodge Charger south on LA Highway 20 and “recklessly passed multiple vehicles at a high rate of speed by crossing the centerline and entering the northbound lane while in a designated No-Passing Zone.”
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:15 pm to Tiger_Stomp
quote:
If true, at most if lacy was driving in the improper lane going against traffic, that still does not constitute the NH because lacy was not under the influence of and drugs or alcohol.
What’s NH? Hard R homicide?
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:16 pm to Tiger_Stomp
quote:
the oncoming driver frantically panicked and crashed into another vehicle and subsequently died
This is incorrect. The pickup driver who braked first to avoid Lacy wasn't even involved in the fatal collision. It was the driver behind the pickup driver who served into the southbound lane trying to avoid the pickup truck who hit head on with the southbound driver Lacy had passed or who Lacy was trying to pass. Herman Hall was traveling southbound. Same direction as Lacy.
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:16 pm to Tiger_Stomp
quote:Literally didn't have time to brake, because the vehicle in front of him didn't have time to brake.
I would have just braked, and any other clear headed individual would have braked instead of SWERVING AND KILLING MYSELF AND OTHER INDIVIDUALS.
You're a fricking idiot.
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:17 pm to lsufan1971
:smh:
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:18 pm to Tiger Prawn
That clearly proves hes innocent. How can it be negligent if the premise of his wrongdoing was in a vehicle? Shouldn't he be charged with VH instead. The judge will surely note this and it will get dismissed or he will be charged with NVH which they cant prove.
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:19 pm to Tiger_Stomp
quote:
That clearly proves hes innocent.
You say axe instead of ask, don’t you?
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:19 pm to Harry Caray
What thinkers? Exactly this is louisiana and a thinker walking among your type is very rare here.
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:19 pm to Shoulderchoke
quote:
donut shop would have been closed at the time of the accident
Thought I read that the accident happened before noon.
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:20 pm to Tiger_Stomp
He passed in area that no one should be passing. It’s a double line, in a curve, near a school zone. Multiple people witnessed a charger driving erratic that caused that accident.
This post was edited on 1/10/25 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:20 pm to Tiger_Stomp
quote:
If true, at most if lacy was driving in the improper lane going against traffic, that still does not constitute the NH because lacy was not under the influence of and drugs or alcohol.
The law clearly states that
1. Vehicular homicide
A. Vehicular homicide is the killing of a human being caused proximately or caused directly by an offender engaged in the operation of, or in actual physical control of, any motor vehicle, aircraft, watercraft, or other means of conveyance, whether or not the offender had the intent to cause death or great bodily harm, whenever any of the following conditions exists and such condition was a contributing factor to the killing:
(1) The operator is impaired by alcoholic beverages as determined by chemical tests administered under the provisions of R.S. 32:662.
(2) The operator's blood alcohol concentration is 0.08 percent or more by weight based upon grams of alcohol per one hundred cubic centimeters of blood.
(3)(a) The operator is impaired by any other drug, combination of drugs, or combination of alcohol and drugs.
(b) As used in this Section, the term "drug" means any substance or combination of substances that, when taken into the human body, can impair the ability of the person to operate a vehicle safely.
(4) The operator is impaired by alcoholic beverages.
(5) The operator's blood has any detectable amount of any controlled dangerous substance listed in Schedule I, II, III, or IV as set forth in R.S. 40:964, or a metabolite of such controlled dangerous substance, that has not been medically ordered or prescribed for the individual.
(6), (7) Repealed by Acts 2024, No. 662, §3.
And therefore the NH should be dismissed. Now considering the fleeing the scene as previously stated “if lacy’s vehicle was not involved in accident he did bot have to stay at scene. Lets resort to the law for that charge of felony hit and run..
Louisiana law states that
(2) Whoever commits the crime of hit-and-run driving, when death or serious bodily injury is a direct result of the accident and when the driver knew or should have known that death or serious bodily injury has occurred, shall be fined not more than five thousand dollars or imprisoned with or without hard labor for not more than ten years, or both.
Firstly, lacy was not involved in the accident and the law is clear when stating that the individual must be the direct result of the accident. The direct result cant be proven because lacy’s vehicle was not involved in any crash.
You mistakenly pulled RS 14:32.1 for Vehicular Homicide instead of RS 14:32 for Negligent Homicide:
Negligent homicide
A. Negligent homicide is either of the following:
(1) The killing of a human being by criminal negligence.
(2) The killing of a human being by a dog or other animal when the owner is reckless and criminally negligent in confining or restraining the dog or other animal.
B. The violation of a statute or ordinance shall be considered only as presumptive evidence of such negligence.
You clearly are grasping at straws trying to help someone out here???
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:21 pm to Tiger_Stomp
quote:
That clearly proves hes innocent. How can it be negligent if the premise of his wrongdoing was in a vehicle? Shouldn't he be charged with VH instead. The judge will surely note this and it will get dismissed or he will be charged with NVH which they cant prove.
A. Negligent homicide is either of the following:
(1) The killing of a human being by criminal negligence.
(2) The killing of a human being by a dog or other animal when the owner is reckless and criminally negligent in confining or restraining the dog or other animal.
So, this begs the question, what is criminal negligence?
Criminal negligence exists when, although neither specific nor general criminal intent is present, there is such disregard of the interest of others that the offender's conduct amounts to a gross deviation below the standard of care expected to be maintained by a reasonably careful man under like circumstances.
Let me keep it simple for you. He was breaking the law by driving at a high rate of speed into oncoming traffic. This is a clear disregard for law and safety of others (i.e. criminal negligence). These actions resulted in a death so he is wanted for negligent homicide. You can read this for yourself from a 30 second Google search. Please educate yourself.
This post was edited on 1/10/25 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:21 pm to Tiger_Stomp
quote:Don't hurt yourself doing all that thinking
What thinkers? Exactly this is louisiana and a thinker walking among your type is very rare here.
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:22 pm to Mouth
Happened right in front of him.
The SUV he was trying to pass was hit by a car that swerved to avoid being hit head on by Lacey.
Sounds like Lacey drove onto the shoulder to get around it
The SUV he was trying to pass was hit by a car that swerved to avoid being hit head on by Lacey.
Sounds like Lacey drove onto the shoulder to get around it
This post was edited on 1/10/25 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:22 pm to Tiger_Stomp
quote:
The drunk driver who cant think ended his own life. Hes just looking for someone to blame it on and a payday
This was on the 14th of December
I’d hope toxicology reports were done.
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:30 pm to Tiger_Stomp
quote:
That clearly proves hes innocent. How can it be negligent if the premise of his wrongdoing was in a vehicle? Shouldn't he be charged with VH instead. The judge will surely note this and it will get dismissed or he will be charged with NVH which they cant prove.
Kyren, is that you on the keyboard?
Posted on 1/10/25 at 4:33 pm to Tiger_Stomp
Common sense and knowing the area he came out of that big curve and smashed on the gas and tried to pass everyone up.
Probably had been riding the car in front of him arse for miles waiting for his opportunity.
Probably had been riding the car in front of him arse for miles waiting for his opportunity.
This post was edited on 1/10/25 at 4:39 pm
Page 18 of 38
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News