- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Joseph Evans back to DL
Posted on 9/1/20 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 9/1/20 at 5:11 pm
Coach O said it during today’s Zoom conference
6
Posted on 9/1/20 at 5:13 pm to saturncube21
It’s a must for depth at this point. Ika, Logan, Roy, Guillory, Taylor and Cherry are the only guys left inside. If a couple of injuries occurred at that spot, we’d be in serious trouble relying on mostly freshmen in this league.
Posted on 9/1/20 at 5:17 pm to saturncube21
What about o line depth? Must mean thomas and Bradford are in
Posted on 9/1/20 at 5:19 pm to GeauxLSU4
I wonder if O is concerned we may lose another interior DL. He said 2 more guys “May opt out”. I hope not, but I feel Evans will be in the 2 deep rotation. He was already 2nd team RG behind Hines and probably would’ve been the first off the bench at LG too.
Posted on 9/1/20 at 5:22 pm to saturncube21
Both of our lines a few covid quarantines from being completely fricked.
Posted on 9/1/20 at 5:26 pm to Magician2
quote:
Both of our lines a few covid quarantines from being completely fricked.
This is not a situation unique to LSU
Posted on 9/1/20 at 5:48 pm to NWLAtiger55
quote:From the way Coach O was talking it sounds like he was first off the bench at either OG position.
probably would’ve been the first off the bench at LG too.
I suspect Hill will be doing double duty at OT and OG now.
Posted on 9/1/20 at 5:50 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
This is not a situation unique to LSU
Other schools have 4 would be starters/significant players out on d line?
Posted on 9/1/20 at 6:13 pm to saturncube21
I don't like this. These situations might be best for the team, but usually aren't best for the player.
How much time was wasn't with Stevens moving him around? Devonta Lee?
How much time was wasn't with Stevens moving him around? Devonta Lee?
Posted on 9/1/20 at 6:31 pm to saturncube21
Seriously? What the frick is going on? All I’ve heard all spring and summer is how great Evans is doing on OL and how he’s fighting for playing time and now all of a sudden he’s back where he started?
Posted on 9/1/20 at 6:31 pm to Magician2
quote:au contraire...
Both of our lines a few covid quarantines from being completely fricked.
1. test positive
2. 10 days
3. test negative... 48 hrs
#4 PROFIT: no test for 90 days!!!!
So come out of quarantine + 2 on, let's say for example, 9/6.
Next test is 12/6. Now when is our last game? I forget... oh yea, 12/5.
quote:Don't forget, one of the policies Carroll had at USC was for DL & OL coaches to spend time coaching the other side of the trenches. Same applied to many of the linemen, they would spend time playing the other side.
Seriously? What the frick is going on? All I’ve heard all spring and summer is how great Evans is doing on OL and how he’s fighting for playing time and now all of a sudden he’s back where he started?
So a movement back and forth for Orgeron (and Cregg) is not a foreign to them as other coaches.
Admittedly this is an apples vs. oranges comparison. Carroll's policy was for coaches and players to gain experience in what the opponent is going to do against you and it was done in practice only and this is a position change situation.
However, I'm just saying such position changes are "less alien" to Orgeron and Cregg.
This post was edited on 9/1/20 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 9/1/20 at 7:03 pm to GeauxLSU4
Also Nelson Jenkins but I get your point. We are getting a bit thin there.
Posted on 9/1/20 at 7:11 pm to I20goon
quote:Why would guys who test negative not be tested again for 90 days?
au contraire...
1. test positive
2. 10 days
3. test negative... 48 hrs
#4 PROFIT: no test for 90 days!!!!
Posted on 9/1/20 at 7:18 pm to Gravitiger
quote:It's a negative test after a positive test (and subsequent quarantine).
Why would guys who test negative not be tested again for 90 days?
If you never test positive, you get tested regularly.
If it was me, just my way of thinking you know, I'm praying for false positives (or arranging them?? who would do such a thing!) up until about a week from now.
Why, because with that false positive you sit for 10 days, get your negative test (because it is a FALSE positive), wait two days and good for rest of season.
Posted on 9/1/20 at 8:44 pm to I20goon
Okay, just didn't follow your original 1, 2, 3, profit logic.
Now it's clear you don't understand how testing works and weren't being logical in the first place.
Now it's clear you don't understand how testing works and weren't being logical in the first place.
This post was edited on 9/1/20 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 9/1/20 at 9:01 pm to Gravitiger
Supposedly, you could continue to test positive up to 90 days after your symptoms are gone. Many employers are not requiring a negative test to return to work. They're simply requiring that you show no symptoms for 10 days then be released by your doctor.
I don't know how it will be handled for NCAA/SEC/etc.
My sister suffered with covid for about 3 weeks, then felt almost perfect for 10 days and still tested positive. She went back to work without a negative test, and instead a doctor's release.
I don't know how it will be handled for NCAA/SEC/etc.
My sister suffered with covid for about 3 weeks, then felt almost perfect for 10 days and still tested positive. She went back to work without a negative test, and instead a doctor's release.
Posted on 9/1/20 at 9:19 pm to GeauxLSU4
quote:
It’s a must for depth at this point.
You’d think, except we seem to have even less depth at OG. Especially with obvious omissions of Bradford and Thomas the last few times O has talked about the Oline. Just a couple of days ago, the general thinking was that Thomas hasn’t fully healed and Bradford came in way overweight. Neither one were thought to have been in the 2-deep.
I’m certainly not freaking out over it or anything, but there’s got to be more to this move. It doesn’t make sense on its face knowing what we know as of right now.
Posted on 9/1/20 at 10:04 pm to saturncube21
He’s the new Jakori Savage
Every team has one
Every team has one
Posted on 9/2/20 at 7:03 am to Jb1994
quote:
What about o line depth? Must mean thomas and Bradford are in
OLine looking way better than Dline right now. We've got freshmen everywhere backing guys up on Dline. This move makes sense in terms of getting someone who has been around more than Guillory/Roy on the inside of the defense, Cherry there too to help out.
I feel bad for Evans though a bit, seems like he gets moved around constantly in his short time here.
Posted on 9/2/20 at 8:10 am to burreauxxx
You’re crazy if you think Evans is the same caliber of player Savage is.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News