Started By
Message

re: Joel Klatt: "LSU Wasn't As Dominant as the Score Suggests"

Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:47 pm to
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
75838 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

Who da f$ck is Joel Klatt, and why should anyone give a Fu$ck about his opinion? Honest question. Never heard of this Douche Bag before.


He's one of the top 2 or 3 color analysts in college football. And you look like tool trying to disguise when you say "frick".
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28148 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:48 pm to
if ducks stood still you could catch them by the bill
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40081 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Who da f$ck is Joel Klatt, and why should anyone give a Fu$ck about his opinion?
Honest question. Never heard of this Douche Bag before.



He's a former college QB (3-year starter at Colorado) and current college football analyst for I think FS1
Posted by LSUButt
Lowcountry
Member since Jan 2006
15857 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

garbage touchdowns


Regardless, we didn't put it away and lost Chaisson
Posted by Mulat
Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
17517 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:48 pm to
Hind Sight is ALWAYS 20 20 and filled with IFS. The fact is

OUR COACHES OUT COACHED their Coaches, a HUGE positive for LSU and

OUR GUYS PLAYED
Posted by RidiculousHype
The Hatch
Member since Sep 2007
10724 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Joel Klatt said he was not very impressed with LSU in their win over Miami


Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:49 pm to
He’s not wrong. We had less than 300 yards of offense and completed less than 50% of passes.

Minus 2 big plays the game was really close.
Posted by geauxdroddz
Member since Nov 2016
2115 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:50 pm to
people should realize yards are down with short fields

Simple math kids
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
104018 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

"Did you know that LSU was only 3 of 16 on third downs? 3 of 16! 

That number would have been a lot different if LSU had continued to run their offense in the second half.
Posted by azcatiger
somewhere
Member since Mar 2011
5354 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:51 pm to
When your right your right. I agree. frick you!
Sorry, I don’t care what a shitty UC QB on FS1 has to say.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88607 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

people should realize yards are down with short fields

Simple math kids


We did not move the ball well in the second half at all. Short fields don't change that. We absolutely have to be better on 3rd down going forward.

Regardless, his take is a really bad one for a supposed expert analyst.
Posted by LSUButt
Lowcountry
Member since Jan 2006
15857 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

people should realize yards are down with short fields


So what happens when the opposing team's punter doesn't punt the ball 20 yards? They had multiple punts barely get to the 50 and we still settled for a lot of field goals
Posted by OvertheDwayneBowe
Member since Sep 2016
3457 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:54 pm to
It's hard to gauge, because of field position, turnovers, and other things.

LSU started past their own 40 on three of their first five drives. Well that's because LSU forced 3 and outs and their punter sucked (22, 20, and 34 yard punts).

LSU's next FG was set up by great field position again (LSU 44), due to a good PR by Giles.

Another INT led to another FG, and then LSU shut it down, gaining 50 total yards the rest of the game.

Stats can say whatever you want. I'm skeptical about parts of the win, but being up 33-3 with 19 minutes left in the game says dominance.
Posted by azcatiger
somewhere
Member since Mar 2011
5354 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:54 pm to
Looked him up. Still don’t think his opinion is any better. Wikipedia page is funny because the pic has his coach grabbing his arse. I know.......Aggie board.
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
68549 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:54 pm to
3/16 on third down is worrisome. Not sure how anyone could think otherwise?
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
104018 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:57 pm to
Because LSU just ran the ball into loaded boxes the whole 2nd half.
Posted by Captain Ron
Location: Ted's
Member since Dec 2012
4340 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

Joel Klatt: "LSU Wasn't As Dominant as the Score Suggests" by TigerBait225


Up 33-3 before Miami threw up a couple of garbage TDs in the 4th? Yeah.. LSU sucked.

Who didn't expect this? Nearly every media expert was predicting a Miami win. LSU dominates Miami, and the narrative changes that Miami sucked or they would have played a better game.
Posted by smash williams
San Diego
Member since Apr 2009
20904 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:58 pm to
They went really conservative in the 2nd half, everyone saw that. If anything LSU was more dominant than the final score suggest.

Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88607 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

Because LSU just ran the ball into loaded boxes the whole 2nd half.



That's still worrisome that the staff was apparently OK with doing that and let Miami get close to striking distance.
Posted by LSUcajun77
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2008
23878 posts
Posted on 9/5/18 at 4:58 pm to
LOOOOOOAAAded

Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram