Started By
Message

re: Jay Bilas Melts Down after Shaq wins in the Vote vs. Lew Alcinder (Kareem) Vote Next Round

Posted on 3/28/20 at 1:32 pm to
Posted by JohnnyU
Florida
Member since Nov 2006
12350 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

So there's no one here that think he has a point? Alcindor's teams won three NCs, and he did it without having two other potential NBA lottery picks (Roberts and Jackson) on the same team.


He does have a point. It’s a damn strong point. Set aside that the brackets sucked. Alcindor was the better player. Folks can bring up that the oath to an NCAA title was easier in Lew’s era but he was still incredible.
I love Shaq. He is great guy with a huge personality and we was a dominant player but Alcindor was better.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35359 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Shaq didn’t let a 6-8 guy dominate him every year the way Wilt did, it just wouldn’t happen.
Didn't the great Shaq Lakers dynasty get stopped by a Detroit Pistons team with a 6'8" center?
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47561 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 5:52 pm to
Yes they did though Wallace was 6-9 not 6-8 but that’s one time not 4 so not exactly comparable. Wilt didn’t just lose to an undersized Russell he also lost to an undersized Willis Reed, also only 6-9, in the 1970 finals.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47561 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 6:02 pm to
I agree Kareem should be in the conversation with Jordan and Russell for the GOAT. I think we have to separate these two things to be fair. The GOAT discussion is based on accomplishments and what that player did and overcame in his time against his peers. You can’t cross eras to compare careers but you can when talking about a head to head matchup. You can see a guys agility, physicality and speed and you can use what he did easily vs what gave him trouble and use that in a matchup analysis against another player from a different era. It’s no different than predicting a matchup vs two players who’ve never faced each other or a common opponent. You also have to account for any rule changes and things like that.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47561 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 6:19 pm to
Again with ignorant and impossible assumptions. No you were not my age watching Wilt, you just said you were 19 and I have children 5 years older than that so again you’re totally wrong and dishonest. And you saying that just because Wilt said it it’s true when it’s been disproven. Your logic is that anyone who claims anything makes it true. That would mean Lavar Ball saying he could beat MJ in their primes one in one is true or that his son is better than LeBron is true. This is just stupidity at its height. You also claim that I didn’t watch the 95 finals and that Shaq only scored when Hakeem wasn’t in the game which is also 100% false. Even your argument that both players were young facing seasoned vets makes no sense and is false. First off how could they both be young if your excuse was Russell was the vet and Wilt was too young lol? More idiocy. And if you had watched them you’d know that Wilt faced Russell up until Russels last year and Wilts 10th season. So again your post is filled with made up BS and fake stories that are easily debunked.
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
24222 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

Yes they did though Wallace was 6-9 not 6-8 but that’s one time not 4 so not exactly comparable. Wilt didn’t just lose to an undersized Russell he also lost to an undersized Willis Reed, also only 6-9, in the 1970 finals.

That 6’10” Dream DOMINATED Shaq in a finals BY HIS OWN WORDS. On top of that he said he never dominated Dream. So what’s your point.
If you average 28 points, 18 rebounds, 4 assists against Russell and totally shut down the middle blocking shots. Including 27 and 4 assists during the playoffs.

You discredit the entire coaching staff and all the other players on the C’s. Red was the great a coach.

So quit trying to argue about Wilt and discredit what the man did. 30 pts; 22.9 rebounds and 4.4 assists FOR HIS CAREER.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47561 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 8:22 pm to
Lmfao I’ve seen some sad maneuvers on this site but what you just tried to pull is the saddest. Adopting my argument and trying to twist it into your own is about as pathetic a move as I’ve ever seen. Not only that but now you’re trying to pull some made up argument about coaching staffs? Lol I guess all your other BS getting crushed is pushing you into weird positions, it’s called “checkmate” btw. Oh and FYI Hakeem is listed as 7-0, 255lbs, not 6-10 so once again facts just destroy your made up nonsense. And stop your lying and phony accusations, were not comparing careers so I’m not discrediting anything he did I’m talking one on one matchups which is what this is about. But if you wanna go career Shaq won 4 titles and lost 2 while Wilt won 2 and lost 4 so you’ve hit a wall there as well. You can’t argue on the merits so you keep derailing the topic and making shite up. When you find yourself standing in a 12 foot hole the first thing you should do is stop digging.
This post was edited on 3/28/20 at 8:45 pm
Posted by CnAzInCA
Dallas, Texas
Member since Jan 2014
600 posts
Posted on 3/28/20 at 9:55 pm to
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47561 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 2:22 am to
You’ve basically made my point. Wilts only advantages in this comparison are off topic and based on the fact that most of his career was unseen. But his biggest advantage is that he had better journalist covering him who were able to use the haze of the unknown to create myths about him. I have no problem with that it was important for basketballs progress but it doesn’t change facts. Here’s a big one, before the lane was widened and Wilt was allowed to stand under the rim, even as the only 7 footer in the league, he never had a FG% higher than 52.8%. Shaqs career FG% was 58.2% vs infinitely better competition and players much bigger and more athletic. Bottom line is Shaq was a better player in every way except maybe passing the ball, which in a 1 on 1 scenario doesn’t really matter. Both players are ranked top 5-10 on anyone’s All-Time list depending on preference so I dunno why you guys think Shaq was some second class clown. Shaq has 4 Titles in 6 tries, Wilt has 2 titles in 6 tries, +Shaq. Shaq has 3 Finals MVPs, Wilt has 1 finals MVP, +1 Shaq. Shaqs numbers went up in the playoffs from 23.7 to 24.3ppg, Wilts dropped by a huge margin, from 30.1ppg to 22.5ppg, +1 Shaq. Shaq is the better player and most serious basketball people will tell you Shaq is underrated in the All-Time player discussion.
Posted by CnAzInCA
Dallas, Texas
Member since Jan 2014
600 posts
Posted on 3/29/20 at 3:11 am to
O’Neal certainly was not faster or better running the floor. O’Neal himself admitted he wasn’t a great rebounder, which Wilt was. Wilt was a better shot-blocker and a better defender, especially in space. Wilt certainly was a better leaper than Shaq. Rules-wise, Wilt was not allowed to back forcefully into defenders to establish position inside as Shaq did. Wilt had to use finesse to gain position and did, which is why he never fouled out of a game. Wilt had much greater stamina than O’Neal did. And, you do know that players at one time (Wilt’s era) were measured without shoes and socks, whereas in later eras (Shaq’s for example) players were measured in their shoes. These items are not said to denigrate O’Neal at all. Just trying to be objective, though you may disagree.

And, you might know this, the lane was first widened because of George Mikan. It was widened a second time because of Wilt Chamberlain in 1964. And, Wilt used to get hacked ALL the time, long before Hack-a-Shaq.

By the way, I used to hate the Lakers, and Philly, and by extension Chamberlain. But, I saw them all play. Shaq was able to get away in the NBA with far more physicality than Chamberlain; however, the league was able to get away with far more physicality on Chamberlain than O’Neal.

Lastly, do not underestimate the effect the implementation of the three-point line had on opening up the lane and reducing the opportunity for collapsing defenses and double teams. Even after the legalization of zone defenses, it is a game changer for affecting defensive and offensive spacing.
This post was edited on 3/29/20 at 4:14 am
Posted by ShockSpot
Member since Dec 2018
110 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 12:21 pm to
Wilt is the best center to ever play. If you think not, you need you head examined. Some stats weren’t even kept in most seasons he played. If you think he can’t jump, just look at HJ in video. He was also the strongest man to ever play in NBA.
This post was edited on 3/30/20 at 2:53 pm
Posted by terriblegreen
Souf Badden Rewage
Member since Aug 2011
9590 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 1:25 pm to
Bilas = Douche
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47561 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 5:52 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/31/20 at 5:52 pm
Posted by ImayGoLesMiles
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Feb 2015
12709 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 5:58 pm to
Screw Jay bilas. He was overrated as a player and overrated as a commentator. Who the fuq is he?
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

Shaq wins in the Vote vs. Lew Alcinder (Kareem)


ohhhhh boy, it's clear the people selected skill and build over college accolades bc obviously Shaq's stats did not translate to WINNING CHAMPIONSHIPS when at LSU despite being coached by Coach Brown and surrounded by the talent he was surrounded by. Yet somehow Bird and MJ advanced all the way to the Finals, interesting.
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

Wilt is the best center to ever play.


He was so great he won exactly 0 natties at Kansas
This post was edited on 3/31/20 at 10:35 pm
Posted by CnAzInCA
Dallas, Texas
Member since Jan 2014
600 posts
Posted on 4/1/20 at 1:37 am to
In 1957, Frank Macguire’s North Carolina team triple-teamed Chamberlain and won 54-53, in triple overtime to win the NCAA finals. Wilt scored 23 points. He was also named Most Outstanding Player (MOP) of the tournament.

Back then, Freshman were ineligible to play. So, Wilt only played at Kansas for two years. Perhaps, more importantly, legendary coach Phog Allen retired after Wilt’s freshman year at age 70. Also, only one team per conference went to the NCAA tournament then. Kansas finished second in conference the next year (Wilt missed three games that season) to Tex Winter’s Kansas State squad but split with them during the season. No shot clock in those days either, so a stall was often employed with a lead.

While at Kansas, Chamberlain ran the 100-yard dash, shot-putted 56 feet, triple jumped more than 50 feet, and won the high jump in the Big Eight track and field championships three straight years.
This post was edited on 4/1/20 at 2:20 am
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
24222 posts
Posted on 4/1/20 at 6:17 am to
quote:

In 1957, Frank Macguire’s North Carolina team triple-teamed Chamberlain and won 54-53, in triple overtime to win the NCAA finals. Wilt scored 23 points. He was also named Most Outstanding Player (MOP) of the tournament.

Back then, Freshman were ineligible to play. So, Wilt only played at Kansas for two years. Perhaps, more importantly, legendary coach Phog Allen retired after Wilt’s freshman year at age 70. Also, only one team per conference went to the NCAA tournament then. Kansas finished second in conference the next year (Wilt missed three games that season) to Tex Winter’s Kansas State squad but split with them during the season. No shot clock in those days either, so a stall was often employed with a lead.

While at Kansas, Chamberlain ran the 100-yard dash, shot-putted 56 feet, triple jumped more than 50 feet, and won the high jump in the Big Eight track and field championships three straight years.



You can try to explain to some but they are just idiots. I go back to what these old arse eyes of mine saw. Hands down Wilt was the most dominant player I’ve ever seen and that includes Jordan.
Just to your point, Wilt learned to pass like he did because of what happened in college.
Then they point to championships the traveling Shaq won. Notice how he didn’t win until he got a great, HOF type player on his team? Kobe, Wade (which Miami was WADE’S team and not Shaq’s). Hell, you can argue that Horry should be in the HoF with his big shots and those 7 championships in 16 seasons - more than anyone since those Cs teams back in the 50/60’s.
They have zero answers when you call them out about defense, rebounding and passing. I saw Wilt, Jabbar, Shaq, Dream, Ewing, Robinson, Sabonis, Garnett, Parish, and many more and can say MANY were more skilled players than Shaq, but not more dominant.
Of that group, only Wilt gets that title of being both. My top 3 are Wilt, Shaq and then Jabbar but it is REALLY REALLY close between Jabbar and Shaq whereas it’s not close between Wilt and 2nd. If you argue Jabbar, I’m ok with that. People remember Jabbar from the 80’s at the end of his career and not mid 70’s. That guy was a monster.
Shaq could’ve been the greatest had he worked hard enough for his career, but he had other interests that have served him well which is why he is the most successful of anyone not named Jordan or Magic. He is a marketing machine without question.
Posted by rbdallas
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2007
10340 posts
Posted on 4/1/20 at 6:40 am to
In that era and close to it....(Alcindor), Kareem, was somewhat in the minority as far a height. He did not always have to play against equal competition. Great player, no doubt, but I think Shaq had more even competition.
Posted by ShockSpot
Member since Dec 2018
110 posts
Posted on 4/1/20 at 7:04 am to
Defense was played a lot different when Wilt played. Hand checking was allowed and they hacked him to death every game. In NBA they triple teamed him a lot before rules changed. If the video about him doesn’t prove his athletic ability and what great people thought about him, well you probably won’t change your mind. He played 2 seasons in college and was National Runner up and lost in 3OT to North Carolina by 1 point. They lost 3 games by 5 total points that year. The next year they lost 5 games by 12 total points and Kansas State won conference and went to tourney. How many NC did Shaw win? I love Shaq, but he ain’t Wilt
This post was edited on 4/1/20 at 8:44 am
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram