Started By
Message

re: If someone pledged up to $1 billion for a "state of the art" replacement for TS

Posted on 12/17/11 at 12:33 am to
Posted by BourbonTiger
Member since Nov 2011
206 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 12:33 am to
This thread is beyond stupid... TS will not and is not going anywhere during anyone's lifetime on here. I can't believe some of you would rather increase EVERYTHING about attending an LSU football game just to watch it on the jumbotron like at Jerry's World. We have the greatest stadium in the country... Just renovate, end of discussion.
Posted by TigerPaul2
Member since Oct 2008
300 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 12:38 am to
Yes with the following qualifications, which I look forward to discussing:

Purpose: the future. Essential Goals in this order: Beautiful outside, practical, and beautiful inside.

Build an 115,000 plus seating capacity Ultradome between New Orleans and LSU and use it for the Saints, LSU, any nearby pro team wanting a great venue (even if part time), any Bowl, and any college conference championship. The winners and losers both get to party in New Orleans without driving.

The Dome would be linked to LSU and New Orleans by a 60 mph raised rail system that would only take 40 minutes for the students (priority) to arrive.

Unlimited acreage for events and for before-and-after-game tailgaiting and parking.

Squeeze in some roof acreage (not necessarily contiguous) to roll back for dry cool days (not a must).

Real seating. No stupid standing room only for 20K plus fans who can’t see the game.

It must be as loud as the Superdome (which is louder than Tiger Stadium).

It must be beautiful outside and inside.

No gimmicks such as giant, useless windows as in Jerry’s World. That must be for seated fans.

The SEC is expanding, and college ball is becoming more and more important.
Others can argue over benches or seatbacks; just don’t forget the goals.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28504 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 12:48 am to
quote:

We have the greatest stadium in the country

Here's the deal, I'm not big on sentimental value and all that crap, but this is Tiger Stadium we're talking about. I'm for renovating every part of the stadium that hasn't already been done, but I couldnt support tearing it down at this point.

Here's a CSB - Brought my wife to her first game a few years. She HATES football and the fact that i'm obsessed with LSU. She was hell bent on not watching the game and planned on bitching the whole time.

We walked into the lower bowl and she looked up and said to me, "this is the coolest place I've ever seen, I can feel the history."

Sorry, but there is no way to build that feeling into a new stadium.
Posted by s_i5
Earth
Member since Jul 2004
2020 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 1:02 am to
The more LSU wins, the more retarded fans we get!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by s_i5
Earth
Member since Jul 2004
2020 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 1:05 am to
quote:

Yes with the following qualifications, which I look forward to discussing:

Purpose: the future. Essential Goals in this order: Beautiful outside, practical, and beautiful inside.

Build an 115,000 plus seating capacity Ultradome between New Orleans and LSU and use it for the Saints, LSU, any nearby pro team wanting a great venue (even if part time), any Bowl, and any college conference championship. The winners and losers both get to party in New Orleans without driving.

The Dome would be linked to LSU and New Orleans by a 60 mph raised rail system that would only take 40 minutes for the students (priority) to arrive.

Unlimited acreage for events and for before-and-after-game tailgaiting and parking.

Squeeze in some roof acreage (not necessarily contiguous) to roll back for dry cool days (not a must).

Real seating. No stupid standing room only for 20K plus fans who can’t see the game.

It must be as loud as the Superdome (which is louder than Tiger Stadium).

It must be beautiful outside and inside.

No gimmicks such as giant, useless windows as in Jerry’s World. That must be for seated fans.

The SEC is expanding, and college ball is becoming more and more important.
Others can argue over benches or seatbacks; just don’t forget the goals.



You are truly an idiot. You simply don't get it!
Posted by fontc
Member since Aug 2009
62 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 8:47 am to
I would be for it. I like the idea of putting in on the river but we have a large batture area (unlike Knoxville), which would be a logistical problem. I would want to see the arches and have the new stadium maintain the same character as the old. And for God's sake, make some better parking to go with it! We really need another bridge over the river and a quasi-traffic loop.(Not just for game day - ridiculous, I admit, but if we're spending billions...)
Posted by Statestreet
Gueydan
Member since Sep 2008
12954 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 9:28 am to
You don't tear down "The Cathedral of College Football". Improve it, expand it. Put the left over 600 Million in an account and use the interest for future improvements and maintenance.

Tiger Stadium is the modern day Roman Colosseum.
Posted by maine82
Member since Aug 2011
3320 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 10:04 am to
I'd be extremely hesitant about this. The only way I'd be okay with this is if they built the new Tiger Stadium on the same field, and you have a design that looks similar to the old stadium and replicates the crowd noise. No naming rights either. No "Boudreaux's Butt Paste Field at Copeland's Tiger Stadium."

One of my concerns is that in building an entirely new stadium, you could have delays running years or more, depending on whether environmental groups want to make noise. So we might be using the Superdome longer than we think.

Just renovate the stadium. I do wish we would take care of our facilities a little better. I've been to the football stadium for the Naval Academy and it is exquisite. Puts us to shame in terms of cleanliness and attention to detail. I'd love to see Tiger Stadium taken care of to that level.
Posted by maine82
Member since Aug 2011
3320 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Yes with the following qualifications, which I look forward to discussing:

Purpose: the future. Essential Goals in this order: Beautiful outside, practical, and beautiful inside.

Build an 115,000 plus seating capacity Ultradome between New Orleans and LSU and use it for the Saints, LSU, any nearby pro team wanting a great venue (even if part time), any Bowl, and any college conference championship. The winners and losers both get to party in New Orleans without driving.

The Dome would be linked to LSU and New Orleans by a 60 mph raised rail system that would only take 40 minutes for the students (priority) to arrive.

Unlimited acreage for events and for before-and-after-game tailgaiting and parking.

Squeeze in some roof acreage (not necessarily contiguous) to roll back for dry cool days (not a must).

Real seating. No stupid standing room only for 20K plus fans who can’t see the game.

It must be as loud as the Superdome (which is louder than Tiger Stadium).

It must be beautiful outside and inside.

No gimmicks such as giant, useless windows as in Jerry’s World. That must be for seated fans.

The SEC is expanding, and college ball is becoming more and more important.
Others can argue over benches or seatbacks; just don’t forget the goals.


And while we're at it, let's shoot the opposing team's quarterback out of a cannon to start the game.
Posted by bluestem75
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2007
3237 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 10:16 am to
Two reasons why this will never happen: LA Coliseum and the Rose Bowl. How long have those stadiums been around? And in an earthquake-prone area.

How about this? Some one donates a bizillion dollars and they tear down the whole campus and rebuild it, after all, the quad is an old POS, too.

They just upgraded Texas's It's Got Sixty-five People's Names On It Memorial Stadium and it is the most boring, sterile environment I've ever been in for a college football game. Part of what I love about TS is the grimy, dark feel of it. THAT'S called atmosphere, people.

I'm curious. How many people who support this type of renovation on this post actually graduated from LSU? Roll call, if you will, please.
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2005
32454 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 10:21 am to
I am a graduate and do not favor tearing down TS
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 10:24 am to
As long as they do not destroy Alex Box.... The intimidator is too good to move
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2005
32454 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Yes with the following qualifications, which I look forward to discussing:
: :

quote:

TigerPaul2

Posted by HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Member since Jul 2011
29587 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 10:30 am to
quote:

The stadium needs upgrades, but it is a freaking college stadium. It's not supposed to be state of the art and this shite is getting ridiculous by some of you


This.
Posted by PeaRidgeWatash
Down by the docks of the city
Member since Dec 2004
15210 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 10:30 am to
quote:

gonna need a lot more $$$ than that to replace TS.



Negative. JerryWorld only cost a billion.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33913 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Tiger Stadium has a maximum of 20 years remaining, in my opinion. It will simply not be structurally sound forever.


This is not true at all. You will still need to do routine maintenance/repairs like the work that will be done early next year but the structure will be fine for decades. The steel is the only thing you have to worry about and as far as I'm aware there are no issues with the reinforcing. Concrete continues to cure almost indefinitely, so it is constantly getting stronger.
Posted by Dtrain706
Member since Nov 2009
362 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 10:33 am to
It's only used 6-10 times a year....that whole project would not be worth it....and all that historical stuff
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33913 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 10:39 am to
quote:

I'm certainly no structural engineer, but I see no reason that the current Tiger Stadium can't remain viable for another century given appropriate structural maintenance.


This is true for any structure.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30390 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 10:40 am to
I have a question about the upper decks.



In a lot of other stadiums, the upper decks cover the bowl by a 1/4th or so.


WHy don't Tiger Stadium's Upper Decks cover the bowl, any?

It would get the Upper Deck crowds closer to the game without limiting the view of the field.

If they do cover the bowl, the don't cover the bowl by much.
This post was edited on 12/17/11 at 10:43 am
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33913 posts
Posted on 12/17/11 at 10:51 am to
quote:

WHy don't Tiger Stadium's Upper Decks cover the bowl, any?

It would get the Upper Deck crowds closer to the game without limiting the view of the field.

If they do cover the bowl, the don't cover the bowl by much.


The only thing I can say for sure is that it costs more money to have the uppers cantilever over the lowers. If I had to guess, money was the driving factor of the upper deck design.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram