- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How the rule is written is a BIG REASON why the foul ball was not challenged
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:24 am
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:24 am
NCAA CWS states:
1. Fair or foul. Ball must first touch ground or a fielder beyond initial position of first or third baseman.
The way this is written, it makes it seem that that particular play was not reviewable. Even the announcers said that the way it is written, that play was not reviewable. They later learned that the word "ground" also meant "wall". Are you frickin' kidding me? The coaches for Oregon State probably even thought the play wasn't reviewable. Oh yeah, they don't have instant replay in Oregon States conference. Crazy. The NCAA needs to change the wording of rule #1 for the CWS.
1. Fair or foul. Ball must first touch ground or a fielder beyond initial position of first or third baseman.
The way this is written, it makes it seem that that particular play was not reviewable. Even the announcers said that the way it is written, that play was not reviewable. They later learned that the word "ground" also meant "wall". Are you frickin' kidding me? The coaches for Oregon State probably even thought the play wasn't reviewable. Oh yeah, they don't have instant replay in Oregon States conference. Crazy. The NCAA needs to change the wording of rule #1 for the CWS.
17
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:26 am to Mie2cents
The coach from Oregon State said he knew it was available and chose not to review it based on what the umpire told him. Give it a rest, let it go it's fricking over.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:27 am to Mie2cents
If you think it's fair, you come out and argue it regardless. Oregon State didn't think it was fair, plain and simple.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:27 am to LSU5508
Yup, he knew he could and didn't.
Sucks for them, but he should have challeneged it.
Sucks for them, but he should have challeneged it.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:27 am to Mie2cents
Fair or foul should be reviewable 100% of the time
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:29 am to Mie2cents
It's not like you get penalized for asking for a review and aren't entitled to one
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:29 am to LSU5508
quote:
The coach from Oregon State said he knew it was available and chose not to review it based on what the umpire told him. Give it a rest, let it go it's fricking over.
Wrong. The coach asked his third base coach, not the umpire. What is the umpire gonna say anyway? He already called it foul.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:29 am to LSU5508
He also said during the game that "it's on him" for not reviewing. Then the next day he went out to argue a different call and instead cried foul ball like a bitch.
Sounds like someone was mad at themselves for this as well as not having success with all of his bush league attempts such as the draw a balk and pump fake starting pitcher.
Sounds like someone was mad at themselves for this as well as not having success with all of his bush league attempts such as the draw a balk and pump fake starting pitcher.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:31 am to Mie2cents
NCAA rule books are extremely hard to understand. For my first 9 years of high school football officiating, we worked under NCAA rules. The next year we moved to National Federation Rules. The rule book was more cut and dry with fewer exceptions. It was much easier to navigate. As the players are more advanced, the rules become more complicated as written.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:32 am to LSU5508
quote:
chose not to review it based on what the umpire told him
Correction. What his third base coach told him
Their coaches fricked up, bottom line.
Enjoy it, this is how Alabama football has felt for the last 5 years every time they played us
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:33 am to Mie2cents
Way too much is big made of this. It is a game that is judged by humans. Things happen and judgements are made in an instant. People who argue these things are grasping at some way to ease the pain of losing. It's part of the game and happens both ways to every team. Enough already. Take the pain!
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:36 am to Mie2cents
Enough already on the foul ball...the Beaver coach was not clued in enough to protest and that's that...his words not mine...
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:41 am to Mie2cents
You're wrong.
The ONLY reason it wasn't challenged is because Casey didn't challenge it. Third base coach said it was foul so they left it alone.
Has nothing to do with how the rule is written.
Let. It. Go.
The ONLY reason it wasn't challenged is because Casey didn't challenge it. Third base coach said it was foul so they left it alone.
Has nothing to do with how the rule is written.
Let. It. Go.
This post was edited on 6/25/17 at 10:42 am
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:42 am to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Enjoy it, this is how Alabama football has felt for the last 5 years every time they played us
And the Bama obsession continues....
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:44 am to Mie2cents
Hey ESPN...your favorite child molesters from the great tolerant state of Oregon lost TWICE. Get over it.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:44 am to Mie2cents
Oregon State had another seven innings, including that same at-bat, and another game to overcome it and didn't do it. LSU beat Oregon State yesterday with its No. 4 SP while Oregon State let an MLB prospect rot in the bullpen until the Beavers were down 5-0 in the fourth inning.
And even with replay, there's no guarantee umps would have made the right call after looking at it. Umps/refs still make the wrong call PLENTY after replay reviews. Replay is overrated.
And even with replay, there's no guarantee umps would have made the right call after looking at it. Umps/refs still make the wrong call PLENTY after replay reviews. Replay is overrated.
This post was edited on 6/25/17 at 10:46 am
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:46 am to Mie2cents
I'm on to Cincinnati
Posted on 6/25/17 at 10:47 am to Mie2cents
quote:
How the rule is written is a BIG REASON why the foul ball was not challenged
there is no rule against asking to challenge. their coach dropped the ball, period.
Posted on 6/25/17 at 11:07 am to LSU5508
quote:
The coach from Oregon State said he knew it was available and chose not to review it based on what the umpire told him
It was his third base coach that told him it was foul
Posted on 6/25/17 at 11:17 am to MadtownTiger
quote:
Hey ESPN...your favorite child molesters from the great tolerant state of Oregon lost TWICE. Get over it.
Ummm.... I'm pretty sure all of them aren't child molesters. Prolly most are not. In fact, I think I remember reading that it was only one... one guy...and that guy didn't come to the CWS.
Just sayin...trash talk should be credible and accurate, if nothing else.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News