Started By
Message

re: How on God's green Earth did LSU have 6 straight losing seasons

Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:08 pm to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94757 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

yeah, but that doesn't meaning winning a big bowl os unimportant.


We can agree on that - Winning the conference (in the BCS era, there is a lot of running together, but stay with me) is more important than winning the Independence Bowl or even the Cotton (maybe). But, to say you win the SEC and get to the Sugar Bowl - heck, those are almost co-equal in importance.

Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60764 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

I'm constantly frustrated with the fact that people don't realize that LSU has played a ton of 12 game seasons. That didn't just start in the 90s.


who siad it did? They now play 12 regular season games vs 10 or 11 in the past. Also there are way more bowl games so its almost a gurentee to play 13. Yes 10-3 is better than 9-3, but what about 9-2-1? Winning % is a better standard, I think we can agree on that, and that Dietzel, Mac, Saban and Miles were all bettter coaches for LSU.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73847 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

holy crap, that is fricking stupid. The teams do not treat them as such.
so they aren't exhibition games?

I'm not saying teams don't prepare for them or that winning a big bowl game isn't important
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60764 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

Arnsparger recruited more per year and higher profile.


how many of Arnspargers guys where from his first class, guys that Stovall was recruiting but were signed after BA became coach?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94757 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Yes 10-3 is better than 9-3, but what about 9-2-1?


Yeah, I think subjectively, 10-3 is better than 9-2-1, but if you count the tie as 1/2 win 1/2 loss, it's achingly close to 80 percent, and almost 2 points better than 10-3.

Posted by tigafan89
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2009
1339 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:13 pm to
Opening loses to Texas A&M each of those years hurt our motivation.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109692 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

How on God's green Earth did LSU have 6 straight losing seasons
from 1989 - 1994?




+



=

Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60764 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

so they aren't exhibition games?


define exhibition game?If you mean a meaningless game, which is the impression your comment gives, then no they are not. People care, teams prepare and want to win them. They are important. Would I rather go 0-3 in bowls and win 3 strait SEC titles over 3-0 in bowls with an SEC title? Probably, but it depends on the bowls, overall record etc.
Posted by panzer
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
4451 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:15 pm to
Don't you know.....the students did yell
SUCK MY DICK at the games

That allowed the opposing teams to run at will against our defense.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94757 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Winning % is a better standard, I think we can agree on that, and that Dietzel, Mac, Saban and Miles were all bettter coaches for LSU.


Arns is actually tied for 2nd with Saban in winning percentage. I have always treated him as an outlier, because of the three years - too small a sample. The year after he left, his hand-picked successor won 10 games, so maybe I should cut him some slack. I just hated the way he left. I transferred a lot of that to the current Alabama coach.

I'm emotionally involved - I only had one coach my first 13 seasons. In the past 30 I've had 7.

Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109692 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

Don't you know.....the students did yell
SUCK MY DICK at the games


80 year old grandmas were yelling much worse from the stands during Hallman's tenure.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73847 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

define exhibition game?If you mean a meaningless game, which is the impression your comment gives, then no they are not
most bowl games are meaningless. They are exhibition games. Why did ND used to have a no bowl game policy? Why do some schools still turn down lesser bowls in favor of staying home?

quote:

Would I rather go 0-3 in bowls and win 3 strait SEC titles over 3-0 in bowls with an SEC title? Probably,
bingo
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60764 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

most bowl games are meaningless.


to who?

quote:

Why did ND used to have a no bowl game policy


I don't really care why someone had a policy over 40 years ago. Back then they voted on the NC before the bowls, now they do not.

quote:

Why do some schools still turn down lesser bowls in favor of staying home?


That only occurs with marginal bowls and teams. 6-6 or 7-5 teams are not contending for conference titles and there are too many bowls, some lesser bowls may cost a school too much. I'd certainly rather win the SEC than the Music City Bowl. But winning bigger bowls is important, even if you don't winn the conference.
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4121 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

how many of Arnspargers guys where from his first class, guys that Stovall was recruiting but were signed after BA became coach?

Stovall gets credit, like Hallman to DiNardo, for an assist, but the guy who signs them is the guy who gets credit.

ETA: Arnsparger got 5 his first yr, and Stovall got 4 his first year.
This post was edited on 11/22/10 at 1:38 pm
Posted by Bobby Moore
Red Hill, Mississippi
Member since Jun 2005
17751 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 1:53 pm to
Joe Dean was the problem....
Posted by Big_Al_316
Mobile, AL
Member since Jan 2005
3137 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Don't you know.....the students did yell
SUCK MY DICK at the games




80 year old grandmas were yelling much worse from the stands during Hallman's tenure.


Sadly, they were yelling that at our coaches, not the other team.
Posted by Brett425
West Monroe, La.
Member since Jun 2010
1758 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 2:09 pm to
I was there from 1990-1995.
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
34324 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 2:20 pm to
Archer won with Arnspargers' players for a couple years, but he could not recruit well. The cupboard was bare by the time Hallman got there, and you could argue he was even worse.

Poor coaching, even worse recruiting, general lack of talent and leadership.

Combine that with the fact that Texas A&M was good, and cleaning up the Houston area. Recruits also left Louisiana for Miami, Florida, and Florida State.
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
34324 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

I think Bill Arnsbarger started the decline. He could really coach but could not recruit.


Wrong. Archer won for two years with Arnsparger's players (87, 88). He did not leave the cupboard bare. Archer left the cupboard bare.
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
34324 posts
Posted on 11/22/10 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Arnsparger never had a team like 1962 or 1969. Mac had more top 10 finishes than Arnsparger had seasons.


Mac never reproduced a 1969 after that, though. He straight up sucked arse in the mid-1970s. His improvement in the late 1970s was too little, too late.

Also, it is worth pointing out that Arnsparger had as many SEC titles as Mac (1).
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram