- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How LSU Baseball Coaches Have Finished Based on Postseason Expectation per Seed
Posted on 3/27/16 at 8:41 pm to TutHillTiger
Posted on 3/27/16 at 8:41 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
ThAt is what U get with Alleva
you're quickly plummeting to one of the worst posters on the site with your pointless alleva posts, and that's saying something
Posted on 3/27/16 at 8:42 pm to ell_13
Yep. Lsu could only exceed expectstions last year by winning it all and could only meet expectstions by making the championship game.
Posted on 3/27/16 at 8:44 pm to josh336
quote:So it's not an inaccurate assessment by the OP, it just needs to be put in context.
Lsu could only exceed expectstions last year by winning it all and could only meet expectstions by making the championship game.
Posted on 3/27/16 at 8:45 pm to ell_13
I think its a clever spin, which is why i want the comparison to other teams who regularly get national seeds
Posted on 3/27/16 at 8:48 pm to josh336
Geez you guys overthink everything. We get it CPM the last few years has struggled in the post season. This season is an outlier because they will take a step back and won't be a national seed for the first time in five years. So if this team which isn't as good as the last four years travels for a regional and wins but loses in the super by your measure would overachieve by their rankings going into the tourney. So does that mean that this team had a better season than the ones you are saying underachieved that went to Omaha and didn't win to justify their tourney ranking?
If you make it to Omaha the season is a success. Just like making it to an elite 8 or final four in basketball. After that anything else is a plus. Anything can happen in a double elimination tourney and the best team doesn't usually win.
If you make it to Omaha the season is a success. Just like making it to an elite 8 or final four in basketball. After that anything else is a plus. Anything can happen in a double elimination tourney and the best team doesn't usually win.
Posted on 3/27/16 at 8:51 pm to geauxtigers33
Claims we over think things, writes an essay
Posted on 3/27/16 at 8:51 pm to geauxtigers33
quote:Seems like that was the only point the OP was trying to make.
We get it CPM the last few years has struggled in the post season.
Now you're overthinking it.
quote:For most if not all teams, yes. But I'm an irrational fan and believe LSU is different.
If you make it to Omaha the season is a success.
Posted on 3/27/16 at 8:53 pm to ell_13
We are the kentucky of college baseball. Using this metric, they underachieve a frick ton in the postseason
Posted on 3/27/16 at 8:54 pm to josh336
I'm pretty sure their whole program feels that way.
Posted on 3/27/16 at 8:55 pm to ell_13
And thats a sport with less parity
Posted on 3/27/16 at 8:56 pm to geauxtigers33
The outlet that most closely monitors high school baseball prospects has ranked LSU's classes:
2015 17
2014 9
2013 12
2012 12
2011 15
5 years, not a single top 8 recruiting class and we expect to play in Omaha every season.
2015 17
2014 9
2013 12
2012 12
2011 15
5 years, not a single top 8 recruiting class and we expect to play in Omaha every season.
Posted on 3/27/16 at 8:59 pm to lsu711
Baseball recruiting rankings are a little different. But still, we could recruit better
Posted on 3/27/16 at 9:04 pm to JP_Tiger
How did a 1-2 in CWS with a #2 start get a met in 2008 and 2013 and 2015 got under?
Look, we are all disappointed that we didn't win it all last year with that team. Certainly didn't meet most expectations, but a NC is an unrealistic expectation in general. I personally think that CPM underachieves in the postseason overall, but he has also overachieved as well (2008 and you can argue 2009).
Skip set unrealistic expectations for us as a program, but that type of run (87-00) is not going to happen again.
Look, we are all disappointed that we didn't win it all last year with that team. Certainly didn't meet most expectations, but a NC is an unrealistic expectation in general. I personally think that CPM underachieves in the postseason overall, but he has also overachieved as well (2008 and you can argue 2009).
Skip set unrealistic expectations for us as a program, but that type of run (87-00) is not going to happen again.
Posted on 3/27/16 at 9:06 pm to lsu711
I thought we had the #1 recruiting class the year before last.
Posted on 3/27/16 at 9:08 pm to ehidal1
quote:Look at the seeds, not the rank.
How did a 1-2 in CWS with a #2 start get a met in 2008 and 2013 and 2015 got under?
Posted on 3/27/16 at 9:09 pm to KamaCausey_LSU
We did. The Mac Marshall class.
Posted on 3/27/16 at 9:10 pm to KamaCausey_LSU
Perfect Game ranked that class 9th after the draft and after Mac Marshall transferred. The class was still probably overrated considering what we've gotten out of Latz and the Byrd transfer.
Posted on 3/27/16 at 9:11 pm to lsu711
quote:You sure? Mac didn't leave until mid fall and most classes were already ranked by then. I didn't realize PG put out another one after October.
Perfect Game ranked that class 9th after the draft and after Mac Marshall transferred.
Posted on 3/27/16 at 9:14 pm to ell_13
Mac isn't listed on that class' roster on the perfect game site.
Godfrey was the other defection from class.
Godfrey was the other defection from class.
Posted on 3/27/16 at 9:15 pm to lsu711
Uh. Godfrey just left. No way PG's ranking that year doesn't have him in it.
Everything I saw that summer once that sign deadline had passed had us at #1.
Everything I saw that summer once that sign deadline had passed had us at #1.
Popular
Back to top


0



