- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Former LSU players had high praise for Coach Orgeron and his staff
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:33 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:33 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
However when averaged out, viola...
:holy shite:
averaging out biased polls dosen't remove bias. It just means that they are the averages of biased polls.
1
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:34 am to RogerTheShrubber
Lmao yea but you only went and found that out after embarrassing yourself with the BCS comment. You’re pathetic attempts to cover your tracks are failing.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:34 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
averaging out biased polls dosen't remove bias. It just means that they are the averages of biased polls.
Would you agree the more polled the less individual bias matters?
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:35 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Texas had a far better win than anyone WSU played. The P12 is terrible.
A voter choosing to use best win over other criteria when ranking is bias.
This isnt hard to understand.
This post was edited on 1/22/19 at 12:36 am
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:35 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Would you agree the more polled the less individual bias matters?
Please don't tell me you're going to try and say 61 is enough to eliminate biases again.
Jesus
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:35 am to Madking
quote:
But that’s not what they’re paid to do
That's exactly what they're paid to do. Unlike retired coaches, ADs and professors
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:36 am to RogerTheShrubber
The computer polls are very different than all the different human polls you’re defending proving you wrong again.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:36 am to Madking
Media members, on average, watch more football than the average fan. Many fans only watch their own team for one thing..
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:36 am to RogerTheShrubber
My god you’re ignorant
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:37 am to RB10
quote:
Please don't tell me you're going to try and say 61 is enough to eliminate biases again.
Im comfortable with it
It seems somewhat consistent with the composite with some minor changes in the top ten. Not enough to worry about. What's your alternative?
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:38 am to boxcar willie
quote:
Media members, on average, watch more football than the average fan. Many fans only watch their own team for one thing..
What does the average fan have to do with anything being discussed?
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:38 am to boxcar willie
No that’s what media members do. They watch their team or the team they’re assigned to they hustle interviews prior to and after those games then they go write their stories for deadline. Not much time to watch multiple games in that profession.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:38 am to Madking
quote:
My god you’re ignorant
And you're a child
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:38 am to RogerTheShrubber
How ironic
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:40 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Im comfortable with it
Bully for you. What does this have to do with anything?
quote:
What's your alternative?
I'm not really sure why you keep asking this. I figured sooner or later you'd catch on to the fact that no one is saying theres a better alternative. We're just pointing out the stupidity in you saying the current format is completely unbiased.
Difficult concept, but certainly within your grasp.
This post was edited on 1/22/19 at 12:42 am
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:41 am to Madking
quote:
They watch their team or the team they’re assigned to
Sounds like something you saw on a tv show.
There are beat reporters and guys that work national games
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:43 am to Madking
quote:
My god you’re ignorant
He's not ignorant. Being ignorant would imply that he hasn't been educated on a certain topic. This dude is constantly educated on certain things, and he always chooses to twist things to fit hit narrative.
He's not ignorant, he is flat out stupid.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:44 am to Madking
quote:
No that’s what media members do. They watch their team or the team they’re assigned to they hustle interviews prior to and after those games then they go write their stories for deadline. Not much time to watch multiple games in that profession
Exactly right.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:45 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Except the computer polls.
Even they have some bias. Human opinion decides which criteria are more important to ranking teams.
They also use those boased polls in their rankings.
quote:
What's a better method? I've asked you and you've avoided
I havent avoided shite. You said polls had no bias. I dont care about your knew goal post position.
quote:
Composites generally mitigate the biases to a good degree
Getting the mean of biased polls isnt mitigating bias.
Every single person that votes in cfb polls is biased in some way.
Youre acting as if half the people arent biased and the other half is and then the mean fixes it.
When in reality its all voters that are biased in some way and composites take the mean of those biased polls.
Posted on 1/22/19 at 12:47 am to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
havent avoided shite. You said polls had no bias
Polls using a variety of people across the country help mitigate individual bias, absolutely
quote:
Every single person that votes in cfb polls is biased in some way.
Their biases are far less important in a system like the AP or composite.
This post was edited on 1/22/19 at 12:49 am
Page 49 of 89
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News