- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/7/19 at 8:59 am to Bandits58
quote:
you mean MSESPN!!
Or .... PMSESPN .....
Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:03 am to Darius David
Are you directing this question at me?
Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:04 am to alatxtgr
U guys still care what ESPN thinks?

Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:08 am to rumproast
It was bang bang but who cares? Y’all just pick negative things that they say like it’s politics.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:17 am to rumproast
I thought it was goaltending, to be honest.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:19 am to rumproast
I wish the media would take their disdain for no calls and apply it to Alabama football.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:20 am to touchdownjeebus
quote:Yup
The ball was on its way down, goaltending.
Don’t care, we won.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:28 am to Goldrush25
quote:
I thought it was goaltending, to be honest.
I agree after watching in slow motion. Watching live it looked clean. Oh well.....Florida got away with multiple walks, a goaltending of their own, a phantom foul on Naz, a block, and Hudson purposely tripping himself to draw a foul.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:33 am to rumproast
So that’s 3 wins the comitee will treat as losses:
1. Kentucky-offensive goal tending;
2. Tennessee-foul called as ref hadn’t injested his whistle, giving LSU free throws to win;
3. Florida-goal tending (never mind the earlier goal tending on FL and a possession we shoulda had on account of a ball out of bounds off a Florida player, which led to a 3 pointer for for Florida)
In other words, were looking at an 8 seed like 2010 as SEC champs!
1. Kentucky-offensive goal tending;
2. Tennessee-foul called as ref hadn’t injested his whistle, giving LSU free throws to win;
3. Florida-goal tending (never mind the earlier goal tending on FL and a possession we shoulda had on account of a ball out of bounds off a Florida player, which led to a 3 pointer for for Florida)
In other words, were looking at an 8 seed like 2010 as SEC champs!
Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:34 am to rumproast
The ESPN experts can’t even see that high while they’re on their knees worshipping the blue bloods. Sucks for them that UK shite the bed and Mt. Zion blew out a tire, never mind Kansas sucking. Guess there’s always Chapel Hill.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:34 am to stapuffmarshy
Win the big dance and ESPN can eat LSU CROW!
Posted on 3/7/19 at 9:42 am to Darius David
You read the Bios on the LSU roster. I’d submit this is as talented and deep of a team in LSU history, rivaling the 79-81 monster rosters. Even the Shaq teams were top heavy but this team is star studded from top to almost the bottom. Kentucky probably gotta a higher rated roster as for as stars, but not much. Tennessee; we every bit as talented man for man.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 10:32 am to Elleshoe
quote:
I actually don’t think it’s that. I think we’re just ruining their UK-Tennessee narrative
You're absolutely right. I'm not on the "ESPN hates LSU" bandwagon but I do believe that ESPN loves the UT UK story for ratings and nothing else.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 10:42 am to mdomingue
Wasn't goaltending. Not coming down, not on the backboard and he didn't trap it.
he clearly deflected it against the backboard.
he clearly deflected it against the backboard.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 10:45 am to rumproast
What are they saying about Florida running out the last 7.6 seconds to preserve defeat?
Posted on 3/7/19 at 11:14 am to rumproast
It was pretty close.
I was glad it wasn’t called for obvious reasons, but I probably wouldn’t have been upset had it been called. It was super close and could’ve gone either way... you can watch the replay 6 or 7 times as I did, and not be certain as to the correct call.
Real time I thought it was goal tending, but I also thought Florida had a goal tending a few minutes earlier that wasn’t called.
I was glad it wasn’t called for obvious reasons, but I probably wouldn’t have been upset had it been called. It was super close and could’ve gone either way... you can watch the replay 6 or 7 times as I did, and not be certain as to the correct call.
Real time I thought it was goal tending, but I also thought Florida had a goal tending a few minutes earlier that wasn’t called.
This post was edited on 3/7/19 at 11:17 am
Posted on 3/7/19 at 11:16 am to chimneylooker
Just be glad they're talking about us. It's a huge change.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 1:59 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Wasn't goaltending. Not coming down, not on the backboard and he didn't trap it.
he clearly deflected it against the backboard.
That's the way I saw it except I wasn't certain on the coming down part. But that is exactly the thing. It wasn't clear either way to me and the call was not made so that's the call. Not goaltending. And I'm good with that
Back to top


1












