- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/19/18 at 6:35 pm to Madking
quote:
The civil war is a poli board discussion don’t you think
yes
my only point was if youre gonna label confederate soldiers as heroes for standing up for their beliefs and they killed us service men then dont act like making a peaceful protest is some huge slap in the face of the military.
and ER and CK are huge POS for standing up for their beliefs.
you know where i stand in the issue of the owners and ER.
i dont agree with ER and CK but i also dont label confederate soldiers as heroes.
This post was edited on 3/19/18 at 6:41 pm
Posted on 3/19/18 at 6:36 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
You said only “physical traits” are genetic, not things like intelligence and personality that would predispose someone to crime
i admitted to being wrong about that.
do i need to start a thread for everyone to see me saying i was wrong?
Posted on 3/19/18 at 6:43 pm to Rickdaddy4188
It’s all good, I was responding to you saying this..
Before you edited your post
Carry on
quote:
i said i was wrong to just stop talking to you
Before you edited your post
Carry on
Posted on 3/19/18 at 6:54 pm to High C
Freedom to kneel leads to freedom of owners to not sign you. Capitalism doesn't care about your political views. If the owners think fans want amateur politicians on their team then they'll sign them. The problem is that literally no one does.
Posted on 3/19/18 at 6:59 pm to Paul Maul number 37
quote:
You and H-Town are wrong.
No friend I am not, you are romanizing about the South as if they were these innocent bystanders defending themselves. Read the founding docs of the Confederacy. It is clear they were fighting to keep slavery. All the other “factors” are just excuses.
I also said the North were not white knights fighting a moral crusade.
quote:
Rhode Island is full of luxury homes built along the ocean with money from the slave trade. Those folks were every bit as involved in slavery
The slave trade was outlawed in the early 1800s. That you are bringing up “what aboutism” is some what telling. That slave labor was used or people that lived in the North got rich trading slaves decades before the Civil War is irrelevant to whether the so called lost cause was a noble fight to defend their homes is bunk, which is all I sta
Posted on 3/19/18 at 7:08 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
is clear they were fighting to keep slavery
the VP of the Confederacy straight up said so in the cornerstone speech.
Alexander Stephens- "
Our new government is founded upon exactly this idea; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests upon the great truth, that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery -- subordination to the superior race -- is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth."
This post was edited on 3/19/18 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 3/19/18 at 7:11 pm to LordLouisiana
quote:
Freedom to kneel leads to freedom of owners to not sign you.
/thread
This post was edited on 3/19/18 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 3/19/18 at 7:21 pm to H-Town Tiger
First off, to keep this relevant to the present thread, I think the owners are more to blame for allowing what took place during these protest rather than the stupid protesters themselves. I could care less what happens to Reid as the entire NFL is dead to me and of no interest. The league did it to itself.
Was slavery legal when the South declared their independence? The answer is YES. Was slavery in danger of being abolished when the South declared their independence? The answer is NO. The north proposed an amendment to the Constitution to enshrine slavery forever if the south remained in the Union. So, if slavery was NOT an issue, why did they declare their independence? Please tell me.
Was slavery legal when the South declared their independence? The answer is YES. Was slavery in danger of being abolished when the South declared their independence? The answer is NO. The north proposed an amendment to the Constitution to enshrine slavery forever if the south remained in the Union. So, if slavery was NOT an issue, why did they declare their independence? Please tell me.
This post was edited on 3/19/18 at 8:13 pm
Posted on 3/19/18 at 7:54 pm to Paul Maul number 37
[qoute]So, if slavery was NOT an issue, why did they declare their independence? Please tell me.[/qoute]
From the mouth of the Confederate VP
From the mouth of the Confederate VP
quote:
Our new government is founded upon exactly this idea; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests upon the great truth, that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery -- subordination to the superior race -- is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:13 pm to Rickdaddy4188
But there’s context to be considered. Those soldiers were soldiers first of all not the officials who started the war and secondly back then that’s just how life was they don’t have the education and understanding of civil liberties and rights we have today. So to judge them using today’s rules is unfair. The protesters are millionaires protesting the county that gave them the opportunity to be wealthy it’s flag and anthem and doing so with limited if not total of ignorance of the issues they’re actually protesting. Do you think they care that police officers kill more white people than black? They’re ignorant and anti American in their protest. But given that it’s fine if they want to do it it’s just wrong to do it while at work and a bad look to do it during events that people enjoy partly because it’s an escape from political rhetoric and nonsense.
This post was edited on 3/19/18 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:23 pm to High C
quote:That's it. You're dead to me. fricking sheep.
systemic oppression
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:28 pm to blueboy
I feel bad for Reid, but his protest in owners view would cost them more money then positives of hiring him
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:28 pm to Madking
quote:
But there’s context to be considered. Those soldiers were soldiers first of all not the officials who started the war and secondly back then that’s just how life was they don’t have the education and understanding of civil liberties and rights we have today. So to judge them using today’s rules is unfair.
unfair? regardless of the circumstances killing US service men is far worse than a peaceful protest.
quote:
The protesters are millionaires protesting the county that gave them the opportunity to be wealthy it’s flag and anthem and doing so with limited if not total of ignorance of the issues they’re actually protesting
agreed. imo its still not close to killing US service men.
quote:
But given that it’s fine if they want to do it it’s just wrong to do it while at work and a bad look to do it during events that people enjoy partly because it’s an escape from political rhetoric and nonsense.
agreed. i dont support them. im simply pointing the hypocrisy of calling Conf. soldiers heroes when they killed us service men and then hating and wishing ill will towards ER and CK.
this is just my opinion.
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:30 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
No friend I am not, you are romanizing about the South as if they were these innocent bystanders defending themselves. Read the founding docs of the Confederacy. It is clear they were fighting to keep slavery. All the other “factors” are just excuses.
Let’s be clear. The Civil War was about MONEY and nothing else. The North was jealous of the South using slave labor and then charge for their products more than they should have. It was about MONEY - The South had it and were holding the North hostage for their products. There was a lack of trust with the trade partners ie didn’t have any built outside of Spain and France.
This post was edited on 3/19/18 at 9:56 pm
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:37 pm to Tiger1988
quote:
Let’s be clear. The Civil War was about MONEY and nothing else. The North was jealous about the South using slave labor then charge for their products. It was about MONEY - The South had it and were holding the North hostage for their products because of the lack of trust with the trade partners ie didn’t have any built Spain and France.
Was North cost of labor that different. They really shite on those baws
To me the money answer is South had investment tied up in slaves. There was no good way to unwind rich baws from slave assets smoothly
Posted on 3/19/18 at 8:59 pm to LSU Patrick
The protest will never never be taken seriously until the players start getting active in their communities. The players like to talk allot, but I am seeing no actions.
Posted on 3/19/18 at 9:22 pm to High C
Good... wrong platform.
Posted on 9/27/18 at 10:11 pm to DocJerome
quote:
You and anyone else who think like this are dumbasses. White fragility.
Jermome fake doc - fricking hip hop dumb frick. Black handouts.
Page 22 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News