- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does the ball have to be COMPLETELY outside of cylinder???
Posted on 2/13/19 at 6:18 pm to Charlie Arglist
Posted on 2/13/19 at 6:18 pm to Charlie Arglist
There were at least three shooting fouls not called on Kentucky that were obvious. Certainly a couple of free throws would most certainly have been made.
Kentucky's got nothing to bitch about.
Kentucky's got nothing to bitch about.
0
Posted on 2/13/19 at 7:49 pm to MetArl15
quote:
They missed the call on LSU.
The rule is if the ball is inside the cylinder, which it definitely was. The ball was definitely off the rim but some of the ball was still inside the cylinder which is TECHNICALLY goal tending! That being said they missed the obvious goal tending on that play on Kentucky for their players hand going inside the rim on that play!!! So if anything that was a makeup “no call” for the UK “no call” on that play!!!!!
Posted on 2/13/19 at 7:58 pm to Dudebro2
quote:
which it definitely was
The Kentucky guys had removed their hands before the ball hit the backboard and the ball bounced off the rim and away from the goal before the tip.
Posted on 2/13/19 at 9:08 pm to MetArl15
quote:
They missed the call on LSU. Great win regardless.
They did miss the call, but they also missed the call when the UK defender whacked the backboard while the ball was in the cylinder, which is defensive goaltending. If a player rattles the rim in any way, while a ball is in flight, it’s goaltending. He smacked the shut out of the backboard.
This post was edited on 2/13/19 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 2/13/19 at 9:11 pm to Sir Fury
Here's what I "think" after listening to "experts" on this:
1. The basketball has to be completely OUTSIDE of the cylinder. Bigsby interfered w the ball before it was completely outside of the cylinder.
2. The defenders hand can go through the insider of the net and rim w/o penalty as long as ball is not on backboard or around the rim.
Now you know as much as anyone else. Expect a rule change soon to be able to review plays like Bigsby's. If I was a Kentucky fan I would be pissed..... just like Saints fans were over the non pass interference call.
C'est La Vie.
1. The basketball has to be completely OUTSIDE of the cylinder. Bigsby interfered w the ball before it was completely outside of the cylinder.
2. The defenders hand can go through the insider of the net and rim w/o penalty as long as ball is not on backboard or around the rim.
Now you know as much as anyone else. Expect a rule change soon to be able to review plays like Bigsby's. If I was a Kentucky fan I would be pissed..... just like Saints fans were over the non pass interference call.
C'est La Vie.
Posted on 2/13/19 at 9:19 pm to DrD
He smacked the backboard while the ball was in flight, thus vibrating the rim. That’s not disputable at all.
They missed offensive goaltending, IMO. They also missed defensive goaltending when the UK guy whacked the backboard.
They missed offensive goaltending, IMO. They also missed defensive goaltending when the UK guy whacked the backboard.
This post was edited on 2/13/19 at 9:19 pm
Page 5 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News