- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/14/25 at 4:20 pm to FLBooGoTigs1
quote:
Blake will have millions of reasons to leave$$$$$ and watching LSU'S offense he probably realizes that he isn't winning a natty at LSU.
You must not know what he makes here... like $3.0 mil/yr. That eliminates 75% of the teams that need a HC. He could possibly take a HCIW spot with LSU as BK could retire soon if he wins a NC or reaches the end of this contract that would put him at 70.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 4:24 pm to DBG
Hold on, you can’t just keep saying “muh context” and not using context for the other side of the argument. That isn’t context, that’s misrepresenting the term to disguise bias.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 4:27 pm to John Rambeaux
I hope it’s not crazy, shoot doughboy a text to make sure. That would be my plan. If CBK doesn’t do extraordinary in the next 2 years he’s gone and Blake would be at home with family making north of 9mill.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 4:28 pm to Madking
I said context specifically to point per game
What are you even arguing against?
What are you even arguing against?
Posted on 9/14/25 at 4:31 pm to WavinWilly
quote:
Baker’s wife really wanted to get back to Mandeville. He may not be gone this year.
I think Blake Baker will be LSU’s next head coach. He’s gonna hang around.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 4:32 pm to FLBooGoTigs1
Blake Baker will be our next head coach when CBK decides to retire.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 4:40 pm to DBG
Because we have multiple examples and probably tons more at other places where you had loaded defenses with talent that were poor. Saying that Baker is replaceable or more replaceable without delving into the context of why he’s good and why we took a big jump schematically is wrong.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 4:42 pm to Madking
I believe defensive success is largely based on talent. Good coaches can elevate it and bad coaches can drag it down, but there isn’t ever a good defense with bad talent. That’s my opinion.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 4:44 pm to DBG
I don’t disagree with that but if you look at some of the schematic changes he’s made this season, they’re at the forefront of defensive philosophy universally in football. So this is a guy that’s gonna be very successful in the future, you don’t replace guys like that easily.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 4:53 pm to DBG
quote:
Have elite talent on defense and you’ll be ok.
What’s “OK” mean to you?
And, why does that not work on offense?
Posted on 9/14/25 at 4:56 pm to FLBooGoTigs1
Baker may be the HC in waiting
Posted on 9/14/25 at 4:57 pm to FLBooGoTigs1
quote:
I have been watching but this offense is god awful and if our defense doesn't score we will eventually lose to a better team that scores more than twenty points.
Maybe but what's the point of borrowing trouble from tomorrow?
This board melted about the baseball team all year, muh fire Jay, fire the hitting coach, fire "Yeski", muh we only have 4 pitchers, muh we won't get out of our regional.
We won a natty.
This offense has a lot of new starters at key positions, maybe give it some time to come together before freaking out.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 4:58 pm to SidewalkTiger
Somewhat agree, we won the game by 2 scores but there are problems that aren’t related to personnel.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 4:59 pm to Madking
quote:
but there are problems that aren’t related to personnel.
This was said about the baseball team all season.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 5:03 pm to SidewalkTiger
Baseball is irrelevant to objective issues in football
Posted on 9/14/25 at 5:05 pm to Madking
quote:
Baseball is irrelevant to objective issues in football
Sure.
It's just an example of folks like you melting about things you have zero clue about.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 5:06 pm to DBG
quote:
Baker is awesome but he’s not irreplaceable.
We hired new DC's in 2020, 2021, 2022, 2024 before finding one who didn't suck...yeah I'd say he's pretty irreplaceable.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 5:09 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
We hired new DC's in 2020, 2021, 2022, 2024 before finding one who didn't suck...yeah I'd say he's pretty irreplaceable.
Different head coach making the first two and House didn't really suck his first season.
House was an okay X's and O's guy IMO, he just didn't fit with the roster. He was a pro coach and his style didn't work with less mature players. We had more senior leadership in 2022.
Posted on 9/14/25 at 5:09 pm to SidewalkTiger
I’m not melting and the fact that you’ve already gone into false accusations proves your logic doesn’t stand up to scrutiny at all. I didn’t make any absolute statements I just said there are some issues on offense. The flip side of your argument would be “ as long as we have 5INTs per game we’ll win”. Which is also illogical.
This post was edited on 9/14/25 at 5:12 pm
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News