- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Curiel to CF, Stanfield to LF
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:43 pm to TIGERSby10
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:43 pm to TIGERSby10
quote:I think Stanfield has better range and a better arm. This seems to be a decision that Curriel requested, but I have nothing to back that up on.
Should have been that way all of last year.
1
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:46 pm to TIGERSby10
quote:
Should have been that way all of last year.
You're right. We may have been able to win a championship if Jay made that move
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:48 pm to Ryan3232
quote:
I think Stanfield has better range and a better arm.
I think the range part is offset by Curiel seeming to get better jumps. But they're close in what they can get to.
Curiel had a shoulder thing last year which really affected his arm, so at least last year, Stanfield had a better arm. I don't know what Curiel's will be like this year, but I don't think it's a particular strength of either of them.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:48 pm to Mr Roboto
Yea we have a championship coach but you know more than him.You can’t this stuff up!!!
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:51 pm to TIGERSby10
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:51 pm to RGT
quote:
Yea we have a championship coach
No we don't.
We have a 2X Championship Coach*.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:53 pm to liquid rabbit
We don’t go up to auburn this year right? If not we’re good in the outfield
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 12:55 pm to The Mick
quote:
According to stats, Curiel had 98 plays with 0 errors. Stanfield had 111 plays with 1 error.
using fielding % is a really poor way to judge how good an outfielder is. A really bad outfielder can end the season without many errors. not saying either are bad outfielders, but I'm not going to look at that particular statistic to make that call.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:10 pm to lsufball19
Stanfield only bad game was that wind blown fiasco in College Station
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:15 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
quote:
Benefits to this?
Draft value for Curiel. And he’s a better OF, anyway.
Really draft value? No bro his value will be high no matter where he plays in college.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:17 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
quote:
will someone beat stanfield out in left ? someone that can git the ball
If you don’t hit you don’t play. He has to be more consistent
Lol bro learn the game. You getting like Hold That Tiger 10 now
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:18 pm to LSBoosie
I just want to know if the pitching will be as good as advertised.
Anyone know?
Anyone know?
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:19 pm to Double Oh
quote:
Really draft value? No bro his value will be high no matter where he plays in college.
Yes. MLB is beating down the doors for corner OFs with questionable power profiles.
Him proving he can capably play CF offsets his lack of power projection.
Also, to take your statement to its illogical extreme, let's see how his draft value would look if we put him at 3rd base.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:21 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
quote:
Draft value for Curiel.
Which is ultimately a recruiting benefit. That and fulfilling promises, which again ties into recruiting.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:26 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
Yes. MLB is beating down the doors for corner OFs with questionable power profiles.
Him proving he can capably play CF offsets his lack of power projection.
Also, to take your statement to its illogical extreme, let's see how his draft value would look if we put him at 3rd base.
It doesn't matter where he plays in the Outfield. When he gets to the pros he will be a CF or LF. His stock will not drop if he continues to play LF in college.
Remember Jake Mangum played CF for Mississippi St. Well he plays alot of LF for them. If you can hit at the MLB level they will find a spot for you in the outfield.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:27 pm to Double Oh
quote:
Really draft value? No bro his value will be high no matter where he plays in college.
You don’t know shite about baseball
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:28 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
quote:
Really draft value? No bro his value will be high no matter where he plays in college.
You don’t know shite about baseball
Learn the game cowboy.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:33 pm to Double Oh
quote:
It doesn't matter where he plays in the Outfield. When he gets to the pros he will be a CF or LF. His stock will not drop if he continues to play LF in college.
Remember Jake Mangum played CF for Mississippi St. Well he plays alot of LF for them. If you can hit at the MLB level they will find a spot for you in the outfield.
You sure you want to use a senior sign that got $20K in the draft to bolster your case for this?
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:35 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
quote:
It doesn't matter where he plays in the Outfield. When he gets to the pros he will be a CF or LF. His stock will not drop if he continues to play LF in college.
Remember Jake Mangum played CF for Mississippi St. Well he plays alot of LF for them. If you can hit at the MLB level they will find a spot for you in the outfield.
Absolutely. My point is if you can hit they will find a spot for you and it doesn't have to be your natural spot in the outfield.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 1:35 pm to LSBoosie
"Water covers 70% of the Earth's surface. Curiel and Stanfield cover the other 30%." - Lyn Rollins
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News