Started By
Message

re: Coach O Is Crushing It

Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:02 pm to
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48219 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

, Jethro. This has always been my stance.


Nope you originally said play to your strength run the clock and protect the ball. You cant protect the ball by playing defense.
Youre a liar.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79397 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:03 pm to
No one said it.

You keep implying it.

When people say the offense needed a first down, it means we should have a good enough offense to get 10 yards. Period.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48219 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

That's not what I was saying. I only said I thought the two scenarios weren't a good comparison because the requirements of each offense in order to secure a win were different and so were the 2 approaches. I wasn't debating which approach was better or worse.


The scenario is the ability of the offense to win the game.


1 offense had to drive down the field and score
1 needed a 10 yards

I think youll agree that getting a 1st down wins the a&m game.
That having a chance to win the game.imo anyway

Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48219 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

&M had the second rated rush defense at the time. E


This is where i bring up your dismissal of run defenses we played in November 2015.
Youre just a hypocrite.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48219 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

When people say the offense needed a first down, it means we should have a good enough offense to get 10 yards. Period.


Exactly.

Saying the offense didnt have a chance to win the a&m game is being dishonest.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298418 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Nope you originally said play to your strength run the clock and protect the ball.


And if you can't get the first, trust your defense.

That's how the game is played, chief. You play the odds.
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
108493 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

The scenario is the ability of the offense to win the game.


1 offense had to drive down the field and score
1 needed a 10 yards

I think youll agree that getting a 1st down wins the a&m game.
That having a chance to win the game.imo anyway

We are obviously on differe by wavelengths and it may be may fault. My brain is all fuzzy right now. I didn't feel like I was arguing against any of this that you just posted.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79397 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:08 pm to
Again

Trusting the defense is always a plan be to running 3 times getting the first down and winning the game.

And our offense wasn’t good enough to do that.

Our passing game was close to trustworthy enough to even try doing that.

THATS a failure on the offense.

There is no getting around the fact that ournoffense could have won the game and didn’t
This post was edited on 2/21/19 at 3:09 pm
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52092 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Has anyone disputed that they are related? Am I losing my mind here?


No. Not one person.

ETA: It only makes it more amusing that he's the poster who constantly belittles other people's reading comprehension.
This post was edited on 2/21/19 at 3:11 pm
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48219 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

And if you can't get the first, trust your defense.


You should be able to get 10 yards to win the game. Why didnt o trust this amazing passing game against a&m?

Just like youre blasting 2016 for not driving down the field.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298418 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

Trusting the defense is always a plan be to running 3 times getting the first down and winning the game.


True.

But you don't take risks. If you can't safely pick up the first, You pin your opponent deep and let your defense hold them.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48219 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

We are obviously on differe by wavelengths and it may be may fault. My brain is all fuzzy right now. I didn't feel like I was arguing against any of this that you just posted.


You're welcome to your opinion brother. I still love you with all my heart.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
48219 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

Trusting the defense is always a plan be to running 3 times getting the first down and winning the game. 

And our offense wasn’t good enough to do that. 

Our passing game was close to trustworthy enough to even try doing that. 

THATS a failure on the offense. 

There is no getting around the fact that ournoffense could have won the game and didn’t


Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298418 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

You should be able to get 10 yards to win the game.



Against the number 2 rush defense, easily done...
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79397 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:12 pm to
But not getting the first down in and of itself is a failure.

And the fact that our offense was pretty abismal all season up to that point doesn’t bail it out.

It’s no different than not being able to run the ball when it counted in 2015 or 2016.
This post was edited on 2/21/19 at 3:12 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298418 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

But not getting the first down in and of itself is a failure.


A calculated failure...
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38656 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

I would bet money that it was a loyalist of the HC that brought up Miles to tear him down so that the coach looks better.




You mean this post, that I responded to:

quote:

Miles had run the program down to the point that winning 10 games was the highest possible achievement. Orgeron "appears" to have moved the team into a position that 10 wins is the norm.

Miles was recruiting the easy players - Louisiana talent and skill players who wanted to be at DBU - and letting our offensive and defensive line talent languish. Orgeron is killing himself trying to fill the gaps until he can get recruiting back to where it should be. His first real class was ranked about 15th, but it was well balanced. His second class was ranked 5th but he had a huge shortcoming at defensive back. His third class is currently ranked number one.

His season records have been 8-4, 9-4, 10-3. Both his recruiting and his actual records point to improvement. Miles' last years were 10-3, 8-4, 9-3 (three really bad embarrassing losses), and 2-2 when he was finally fired. And Miles' classes, while ranked fairly high, left whole position groups neglected.

Orgeron's first three years look a lot better than Miles' last three. I'm one of the few on here who remember that you were actually in favor of Miles being fired at the end. You often are unjustly accused of being a Miles defender when you are actually just stating your opinion that Ed Orgeron gets credited for doing what got Miles fired. I just don't agree that the positive trajectory under Orgeron is the same as the slightly negative trajectory under Miles. And it's my opinion that Miles' trajectory was about to get a lot worse. That 2-2 was ugly, and the negativism around the program was going to be hard to overcome.

I don't think Orgeron is a better coach than Miles. I don't think he's even as good as far as ability goes. But Orgeron is working hard. Miles was on cruise control. Big time SEC football is no place for a coach who is complacent. Orgeron hasn't proven himself yet, but he's proven a lot of us wrong. I thought he would be a disastrous coach. He's turned out at least OK. Let's see where he goes from here. I sure am excited about the 2019 recruiting class, and I think he might dethrone Alabama with his 2020 class. Can he do it on the field?


YW
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79397 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:14 pm to
if You want to get into calculated errors

We were a bad running team
We were missing 2 CBS. We have no passing game that involves quick catch and run passes that are 90% completions.

The offense couldn’t be trusted to get a 1st down.

This wasn’t some unstoppable defense.

Miss St ran for 4.6 yards a carry with no passing game.
This post was edited on 2/21/19 at 3:17 pm
Posted by earl keese
A Thousand Miles from Nowhere
Member since Jan 2014
7029 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Well, people would probably still be bitching about the inept passing game which severely limited LSU's ability to win.


Probably so Roger. At least you would, since you really seem to be hung up on a passing game since this is twice in the last couple of days that you've whined about the LSU passing attack under Miles, all the while praising o and e for their new and improved passing attack.

Never mind the fact that the rushing game dropped into the 50's nationally (59 to be exact) this past year as opposed to #7 during Miles final full season.

And both season we lost 3 games. Imagine that.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52092 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

You mean this post, that I responded to:


Same post that got me back into this thread.
Jump to page
Page First 124 125 126 127 128 ... 166
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 126 of 166Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram