- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/20/16 at 6:42 pm to ExpoTiger
Are you fkn serious on Collins? He slid? Uh yeah, a little thing you call an order not to draft by the commish.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 8:39 pm to Bmath
quote:
Minter had better stats than 1st round pick Manti Te'o.
1)Yea, but he ran a 4.81 at the combine.
Scouts look for production to match measureables. While Minter had a great year statistically, his combine numbers were just average.
2) Teo wasn't a first round pick.
quote:
Hill had great stats, and fantastic measurables. No one can be like Fournette though.
Hill's measureables were not fantastic. They were just good for his size. He ran a 4.66. He dropped because of character concerns mainly, but had his 40 been better, he would have went higher.
quote:
Landry had far better productivity (up to this point anyway) even while playing opposite of OBJ. He isn't quite as tall, but their speed is likely even.
I dont even know who you are even comparing Landry too, but Im 100% sure they wont run a 4.77 40yd dash at the combine like he did at the combine.
Your facts in your post are not even close to being accurate.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 9:18 pm to Lester Earl
He should be D-math instead of Bmath
Posted on 1/21/16 at 6:16 am to Tigerinthehollow
If that were to happen, it would more than probably mean LSU win the SEC and makes the playoff. Let's hope this comes to fruition.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 9:56 am to Tigerinthehollow
quote:
Tigerinthehollow
Can there be 6 first rounders next year? Sure. Is it likely? No, not at all.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 10:39 am to Tigerinthehollow
Posted on 1/21/16 at 10:49 am to Bmath
quote:
That's cute.
Since you like mock drafts and projections:
Landry
Minter
Hill
touche!
Posted on 1/21/16 at 11:13 am to Tigerinthehollow
Of course not. But tiger Tards will always think so....... 
Posted on 1/21/16 at 1:17 pm to rilesrick
Yes we are tards, even though 6-8 are projected by various mock drafts. I guess most of those mock drafts have tards compiling the data, with obvious LSU bias.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 1:19 pm to Bmath
Dude I'm not even going to click on whatever you posted. If you think hill and fournette are valued equally when they became draft eligible....and that Dupree and Landry are close in measurable and speed...then cheers to you. Not worth arguing, I like them all.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 1:20 pm to Salmon
I've seen early mock drafts with Dupre as high as top ten and Neal in the top 20. Personally I think 4/6 are first round. Maybe not all next year though
Posted on 1/21/16 at 1:22 pm to jeffsdad
OK Jeff...since you are so set on telling us we are wrong plus the fact you shite on the prospects of 2016 team...I tell ya what...I'll offer a perma band up that LSU has more than 3 first round picks in 2016...deal?
Posted on 1/21/16 at 1:23 pm to Quatre Pot
Yeah most mocks have 6, but there are 8 tigers projected in various mock drafts as first round draft picks. Of course, the negatigers arent having any of that.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 1:27 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Im 100% sure they wont run a 4.77 40yd dash at the combine like he did at the combine.
He pulled a hamstring and ran it anyway... then followed that up with a 4.5 at his pro day. Most of your post was solid, but come on, man.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 1:31 pm to Tigerinthehollow
quote:
r you posted. If you think hill and fournette are valued equally when they became draft eligible....and that Dupree and Landry are close in measurable and speed...then cheers to
I think they are similar in speed, Juice is quicker, Dupre's vertical jump is much better.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 1:40 pm to Tigerinthehollow
[quote]8 are projected by various mock drafts. I guess most of those mock drafts have tards compiling the data, with obvious LSU bias.[/quote
Mock drafts are pretty damn pointless. Even more so when they try to predict something that is more than a year away.
It's one thing to say that it could potentially happen, but you have repeatedly said it is "likely."
Mock drafts are pretty damn pointless. Even more so when they try to predict something that is more than a year away.
It's one thing to say that it could potentially happen, but you have repeatedly said it is "likely."
Posted on 1/21/16 at 1:44 pm to TigerAlum93
He is also taller...I like Landry...I'm just saying the measurables for Dupree are much more favorable to the NFL...
Posted on 1/21/16 at 1:51 pm to Wayne Campbell
Dude it was a post...I have personally predicted 5 but honestly think six will go. Fournette and Adams and Dupree are top 15 in most all that I've seen...I don't think it is a stretch that each of those five stars will go first round.
That leaves pocic, Neal, beckwith, and white and godcheaux.. White had a late first early second draft grade this year. Pocic had a second round this year, beck had a second round this year, and Neal and godcheaux are both projected first rounders in all the mocks...fwiw.
Sorry man, didn't mean to ruin your day. Maybe you will be right and we will only get a couple.
That leaves pocic, Neal, beckwith, and white and godcheaux.. White had a late first early second draft grade this year. Pocic had a second round this year, beck had a second round this year, and Neal and godcheaux are both projected first rounders in all the mocks...fwiw.
Sorry man, didn't mean to ruin your day. Maybe you will be right and we will only get a couple.
Popular
Back to top


0




