
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Can Benefield play Star?
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:09 pm
He was a menace in the 2nd half playing close to LOS. Made 2 of the biggest defensive plays of the game - 20 yard sack & the blitz that caused an INT.
Also had Chambliss on the 3rd down late in game whenever Trinidad impressively flicked the ball
I think him at Star and Jhase Thomas at FS is smart. Thomas can cover some ground. I hate Spears being out but was encouraged how we looked on those 3 aggressive defensive drives last week
Also had Chambliss on the 3rd down late in game whenever Trinidad impressively flicked the ball
I think him at Star and Jhase Thomas at FS is smart. Thomas can cover some ground. I hate Spears being out but was encouraged how we looked on those 3 aggressive defensive drives last week
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:11 pm to cajuntiger1010
I agree. Would much rather see Benefield at STAR
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:13 pm to cajuntiger1010
Woodland played a little star during the game. Might see a lot of nickel from here on out with 3 cbs and 2 safeties.
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:13 pm to cajuntiger1010
If they wanted Benefield at Star, he would have been there in the first place. He's way too valuable where he's at
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:16 pm to cajuntiger1010
quote:
Can Benefield play Star?
He can cover a lot space in zones and is excellent around the LOS. But Woodland and Cooley are better in man coverage. You're going to see him used in zone coverages and at the LOS but is he going to play Star? Probably not just due to having 2 players who are more suited to cover receivers man-to-man.
This post was edited on 9/22/26 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:17 pm to LSUfan4444
quote:
If they wanted Benefield at Star, he would have been there in the first place. He's way too valuable where he's at
Thats all under the premise that Spears is available....now that hes not....that may change things.
I dont know the answer obviously, but suggesting Benefield may CURRENTLY be the best option at star cant be discounted bc he was playing true safety. Im not sure what the answer is.
Jimcoily didnt seem to work.
This post was edited on 9/22/26 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:20 pm to ColeLSU
quote:
Thats all under the premise that Spears is available....now that hes not....that may change things.
It doesn't. Ty is a free safety, you don't want him covering a slot, you recruited him to play FS, not Star. Even if he was SLIGHTLY better than Woodland at Star you would dramatically drop in talent at FS. It's a net negative. No, he is not moving to Star.
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:25 pm to cajuntiger1010
I think the best defense on the field is keeping Benefield where he is, moving Cooley into the star role, and Thomas at FS.
That worked exceptionally well in the second half. Benefield might be better than Cooley there, and Cooley might be better than Thomas at FS, but I think you lose more than you gain by taking Benefield off of a true safety position in base sets.
idk though. I'm sure we're going to run looks with Benefield down closer to the LOS now. It really just blows because Spears was perfect for that role. Only guys in recent memory that could play it better are probably Jamal Adams and Tyrann. Maybe Haulcey/Reid too, but the list is short.
That worked exceptionally well in the second half. Benefield might be better than Cooley there, and Cooley might be better than Thomas at FS, but I think you lose more than you gain by taking Benefield off of a true safety position in base sets.
idk though. I'm sure we're going to run looks with Benefield down closer to the LOS now. It really just blows because Spears was perfect for that role. Only guys in recent memory that could play it better are probably Jamal Adams and Tyrann. Maybe Haulcey/Reid too, but the list is short.
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:27 pm to ColeLSU
quote:Well put. I'm sure we'll see different looks now.
I dont know the answer obviously, but suggesting Benefield may CURRENTLY be the best option at star cant be discounted bc he was playing true safety. Im not sure what the answer is.
quote:Yeah. Not fast enough and doesn't have the instincts needed to play a DB role.
Jimcoily didnt seem to work.
I think he can be good somewhere on the field, but it's not at STAR. At least not this year.
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:49 pm to SaneTiger
quote:
Would much rather see Benefield at STAR
Yeah, I'm glad he started making plays in the box and blitzing because he's terrible as a deep centerfield safety
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:52 pm to cajuntiger1010
He definitely stood out Saturday night
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:52 pm to lowhound
quote:
Yeah, I'm glad he started making plays in the box and blitzing because he's terrible as a deep centerfield safety
Top 3 rated safety for the NFL draft is terrible???? He’s fantastic you dolt
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:53 pm to PP7 for heisman
quote:
I think the best defense on the field is keeping Benefield where he is, moving Cooley into the star role, and Thomas at FS. That worked exceptionally well in the second half
Are you sure? I saw J Jackson make an interception so assumed they moved Woodland to star and Jackson replaced him…
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:55 pm to Sweep Da Leg
quote:
He’s fantastic you dolt
Not in coverage
Posted on 9/22/26 at 1:58 pm to LSUfan4444
quote:
If they wanted Benefield at Star, he would have been there in the first place. He's way too valuable where he's at
if hes going to play safety at the next level then lsu probably promised him they would play him there in college and not mess up his draft stock
Posted on 9/22/26 at 2:03 pm to lowhound
quote:
Not in coverage
He is actually pretty darn good in zone coverages. He eliminated a decent amount of plays. Now he isn't asked to play man because he isn't strong in man coverage but saying he isn't good in coverage is misleading and incorrect.
Posted on 9/22/26 at 2:05 pm to LSUfan4444
Or when Spears was available that was their best setup.
Now he isn’t.
Lineups will change.
Now he isn’t.
Lineups will change.
Posted on 9/22/26 at 2:08 pm to honeybadger07
Sidenote;
Just watched Ty’s midweek player interview. Safe to say these guys want to show themselves out on Saturday
Just watched Ty’s midweek player interview. Safe to say these guys want to show themselves out on Saturday
Posted on 9/22/26 at 2:13 pm to PurpleSingularity
I think Woodland, Benefield, Cooley, and Jase Thomas all played snaps at star in the 2nd half.
It says a lot about Benefield that he'd probably be the best option at 3 different positions on the field. That's how good he is.
Star is the hardest position to fit with the right athlete and scheme knowledge. So, that says Benefield should take it. But, you have to see if that creates too big of a drop off at FS. I guess that's the big decision for Blake.
I suspect Jase Thomas will get more reps this week at star.
It says a lot about Benefield that he'd probably be the best option at 3 different positions on the field. That's how good he is.
Star is the hardest position to fit with the right athlete and scheme knowledge. So, that says Benefield should take it. But, you have to see if that creates too big of a drop off at FS. I guess that's the big decision for Blake.
I suspect Jase Thomas will get more reps this week at star.

Popular
Back to top


8












