Started By
Message

re: Bower’s fumble should have been called a targeting

Posted on 8/31/25 at 3:46 pm to
Posted by atltiger6487
Member since May 2011
19671 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Bower’s fumble should have been called a targeting
good lord, the bitching about referees is at Defcon 1.

so freaking childish.
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
18371 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 3:53 pm to
Looks like a shoulder to me so no. I disagree
This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 3:54 pm
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
19119 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 3:54 pm to
Nope, but per Browns ruling, it wasn’t a catch.
Posted by Sailor Sam
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Feb 2017
533 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 7:26 pm to
Not a clue, but the whole basis for the rule is to promote player safety. It has done nothing in that respect. Ejecting the player and suspending him for the next game also serves no purpose.
Posted by CovingtonTiger
Covington, LA
Member since Oct 2007
560 posts
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:04 pm to
I don’t think that was the play where, but there was one where the Clemson defender speared the receiver and ended up going down immediately. He was down for a while and they came out and helped him off the field. He looked concussed.

I thought that spearing was now called targeting no matter where you hit the other player or if he was defenseless or not. The idea is to protect the defensive player from his own mistakes. All of those should at least be a personal foul.
Posted by mikecno
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
1895 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 7:52 am to
I thought is was a clean hit...he caught Bower by surprise
Posted by tschla1
Atlanta, GA
Member since Sep 2010
959 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 7:56 am to
His helmet never touched Bauer
Posted by boweswi05
birmingham
Member since Aug 2016
6580 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:04 am to
quote:

This is why Bowers dropped the ball. Defender led



IBower’s


Ummmmm someone going to tell him or should I?
Posted by Captain Crown
Member since Jun 2011
55707 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:06 am to
That’s just football
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
7027 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:08 am to
If that’s your definition of targeting they could call it on every play; that’s football.
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
81650 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:16 am to
I dont think your vision is very good if you think thats helmet to helmet, in addition to your spelling
This post was edited on 9/1/25 at 8:17 am
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
2080 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:18 am to
No. The only thing you can maybe argue is that he didn't complete the catch and football move. That's NOT targeting, and I'm the idiot that start the ref hate thread.
Posted by PalletJack
LA by birth, TX by choice
Member since Oct 2024
841 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:23 am to
Idiotic take. The defender was in perfect position to make a play and did. He was trailing as the ball was being tucked which allowed him to slide a hand into the pocket and punch it out. Unfortunately for our guy he was victimized by a good play but very few guys hold on to the ball here
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94561 posts
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:25 am to
Moscona pointed out that while folks are focused on Bauer's fumble, Bauer got up and hustled to make a likely TD saving tackle.

That's a stat that will do little for his resume and do little to get folks to forget the fumble, but that's the sort of players you have to have to win big games. No one plays mistake-free football. Great players overcome them in real time.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram