re: BK responds to the GMA interview

In Brian Kelly's first public remarks about Greg, he even mentioned going to the hospital to see him.

quote:

---

money. Money he probably needs for Greg.

---

GTFO! This IS about money for Greg, but not JR.!

quote:

---

LSU by far has the deepest pockets.

---

I'd say the insurance company for the surgeon and OLOL has the deepest pockets

quote:

---

I'd say the insurance company for the surgeon and OLOL has the deepest pockets

---

Nah

$500,000 cap on that

quote:

---

Nah

$500,000 cap on that

---

There's a $500k cap on lawsuits against government entities too. A state university, I would imagine, falls underneath that umbrella.

ETA: did some cursory case law research and there is a published case from 2023 re LSU Shreveport that addresses this

quote:

---

Here, it is well settled under Louisiana law that state universities are not juridical entities capable of being sued, namely because they do not function independently. Rather, state universities are agencies or divisions under the supervision and management of another governmental entity. See Hall v. Bd. of Supervisors of Cmty. & Tech. Colleges, No. CIV.A. 15-67, 2015 WL 2383744, at *2 (E.D. La. May 18, 2015); Williams v. Louisiana, No. CV 15-2353, 2017 WL 359218, at *3 (W.D. La. Jan. 24, 2017). Accordingly, Louisiana State University in Shreveport is dismissed with prejudice.

---

That $500k cap against physicians also doesn't exclude or limit past and future medical expenses.

What is interesting, however, is there are other allegations outside the scope of his actual injury for which he is suing LSU. He is suing them on NIL grounds, HIPAA violations, giving the doctor a "hero" award without asking him about it, and disseminating false and misleading information about him

He is one of the only players in the history of lsu football to have his number on the field during a game……

Amazing they are trying to gaslight people lsu left him behind

quote:

---

The Real blame is with the docs at OLOL

---

How do you know this? A poor outcome does not equal medical malpractice in every situation.

Have you read the medical records? Have you had them reviewed by an expert physician to get an opinion on the outcome which involved removing a tumor from the brain?

So many people here believed every word Brooks Sr said in that one sided and slanted interview. People are assuming due to the outcome, something had to have been done wrong. Maybe and maybe not. There's no way to know at this point, particularly regarding the medical procedure. Hopefully, none of the gullible people will be selected for the jury. Both sides get to present their cases. After that, and only after that, is a decision made.

ETA: That's if it goes to trial and if some or all of the allegations are not dismissed via summary judgment which is possible.

quote:

---

This is BRAIN surgery. Every single neurosurgeon will have cases that end up like Brooks

---

Good point..just read that and was posted it again bc it sounded like they knew what they were talking about

Insurance will settle, it will be up to the parents how far they want to push the settlement.