- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Baseball Preview 2024 Edition (Feb 10th - Pro Prospects & SEC Predictions)
Posted on 2/6/24 at 8:28 am to BayTiger13
Posted on 2/6/24 at 8:28 am to BayTiger13
He hasn’t played defensively at all this spring. He is only pinch running although he didn’t even do that last night.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 8:38 am to WinnieTiger
quote:
He hasn’t played defensively at all this spring.
Yeah don't believe that I've seen him bat at all either in the scrimmages.
This outfield is crowded even without Cooley. Mitchell's speed has impressed me and Paul's instincts and abilities out in the field look to be as good as any.
I think Bingham is a big piece of how well this team ends up being offensively.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 8:47 am to BayTiger13
Yea Cooley is redshirting, typo on my end
Posted on 2/6/24 at 9:07 am to Classy Doge
quote:
I think Bingham is a big piece of how well this team ends up being offensively.
We need Bingham to hit .300 or more. This lineup isn’t as strong 1-9 as last years, and Bingham is an experienced bat that has shown he can be a good hitter at this level. If he has a good year we can score a few runs and count on our pitching staff to hold other teams down.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 9:12 am to Choupique19
We need to figure out who will get on base at the top of the lineup in front of White/Travinski. I had my eye on Kling/Bingham/Pearson/Braswell as candidates for that. As of now I think I would lean toward Braswell/Pearson/White/Travinski as the 1-4 hitters of the lineup.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 9:53 am to BayTiger13
D1 Baseball released their SoCon preview today. Opening weekend opponent VMI features their preseason conference player of the year in 3B Justin Starke. VMI is picked to finish third in the league.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 11:07 am to Adam4848
Comparing 2023 to 2024 - If you average the attribute scores of the OF projected starters, 23 was a 64.67 and 24 is 61.33. But you gave the group in 23 a 75 and this years group a 60. Was the 23 group score due to more depth?
Posted on 2/6/24 at 11:36 am to lsu711
quote:
Was the 23 group score due to more depth?
The position grade as a whole takes into account more than tools (depth, intangibles, experience).
In 2023 you had a combination of Dylan Crews, Tre Morgan, Brayden Jobert, Josh Pearson, Paxton Kling etc...
This years potential starting outfield has a combined 21 starts between the three. I'm shying on the side of caution here with respect to how I graded it because there are still questions that need to be answered.
I hope this explained my rational.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:28 pm to Adam4848
Makes sense. It will always be subjectively objective.
Just like an 80 is comparative to Kris Bryant power, “535” is now a proxy for a championship team.
2024 would need an 80 SP and 80 RP to get there. 75 was probably a bit heavy for last year’s staff - though it included Shores. Same for 65 RP - that included Grant Taylor.
Just like an 80 is comparative to Kris Bryant power, “535” is now a proxy for a championship team.
2024 would need an 80 SP and 80 RP to get there. 75 was probably a bit heavy for last year’s staff - though it included Shores. Same for 65 RP - that included Grant Taylor.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:43 pm to Yeti_Chaser
quote:
We all know Adam isn't a professional scout
Fwiw he used to tell people he was
Posted on 2/6/24 at 12:43 pm to lsu711
quote:
2024 would need an 80 SP and 80 RP to get there. 75 was probably a bit heavy for last year’s staff - though it included Shores. Same for 65 RP - that included Grant Taylor.
Yea it goes to show just how good Skenes was that's not quantifiable in preseason numbers.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 2:48 pm to Adam4848
quote:
This years potential starting outfield has a combined 21 starts between the three.
Mac Bingham’s starts don’t count?
Posted on 2/6/24 at 2:56 pm to Adam4848
quote:
intangibles
How can you remotely quantify that if you're not spending time with these players?
Posted on 2/6/24 at 2:57 pm to Choupique19
quote:
Mac Bingham’s starts don’t count?
Listening to some local media, some people are really discounting Bingham's production because it came in the Pac 12. Not saying that's what's happening here, this just gave me an opening to talk about it.
On the Hannycast, Canevari said Bingham would hit like .275 in the SEC. In about 280 PAs over the last two years, Bingham hit like .343 in conference games.
The SEC is great, but it's not so much better than the Pac 12 that Bingham will suddenly drop 80 points on his average. Pac 12 is really good. It's more pitchability than power arms (on average) and the fields are generally bigger than in the SEC, so the hitting environment is a little different. But Bingham will be fine here.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 3:01 pm to Choupique19
quote:
Mac Bingham’s starts don’t count?
Yes, my sentence you are quoting is reference to the starts this outfield has had in an LSU uniform.
Bingham - 0
Kling - 21
Brown - 0
This post was edited on 2/6/24 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 2/6/24 at 3:05 pm to Broski
quote:
How can you remotely quantify that if you're not spending time with these players?
Great question. What would you rate the OF as a whole in 2023 and in 2024?
Posted on 2/6/24 at 3:11 pm to Adam4848
quote:
Great question. What would you rate the OF as a whole in 2023 and in 2024?
Huh? I'm not saying my ratings are better or matter any more.
My point was you saying that you take intangibles into account, which doesn't make any sense unless you are seeing how these guys interact with each other in the dugout, clubhouse, etc.
Just felt like a catch-all word you threw in there to explain away the unexplainable.
This post was edited on 2/6/24 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 2/6/24 at 3:23 pm to Broski
quote:
Huh? I'm not saying my ratings are better or matter any more. My point was you saying that you take intangibles into account, which doesn't make any sense unless you are seeing how these guys interact with each other in the dugout, clubhouse, etc. Just felt like a catch-all word you threw in there to explain away the unexplainable.
Yea I’m not following. You’re asking me if I’m in the dugout and hanging out with these players to explain why the outfield received a higher grade last year? Much of last years team was together for the better part of 2-3-4 years.
Posted on 2/6/24 at 3:24 pm to Adam4848
quote:
You’re asking me if I’m in the dugout and hanging out with these players to explain why the outfield received a higher grade last year?
What?
That's not what I'm saying at all.
Popular
Back to top


1




