- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: bama got there bag man to the sec office
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:05 am to SweetTeaOnionRings
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:05 am to SweetTeaOnionRings
I called Jimmy Ott's radio show before the Aub game a few years ago, and told Jimmy that I feared the SEC refs were going to stick it to LSU. I was laughed at on the radio. The next week, following Sec refs public raping of LSU, Jimmy got calls from LSU fans stating, remember the guy who called about sec refs Jimmy, we shouldn't have laughed, he was right, he'll be calling you back.
For some odd reason, I don't fear the SEC refs this time. Maybe it's because we have Superman on our side.
For some odd reason, I don't fear the SEC refs this time. Maybe it's because we have Superman on our side.
This post was edited on 10/27/15 at 10:09 am
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:06 am to TangipahoaTiger
quote:
Also, in the cherry picked still shot that gets posted here everyday of the Peterson/Jones play.... look at the video. Jones touches the ball first. Jones was out of bounds.
You obviously didn't watch the video. Jones doesn't touch the ball and is out of the play by the time he is out of bounds. You belong on a Bama board spouting their talking points.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:06 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Well if he truly is biased absolutely. That is the problem with yalls theory. You are selective as shite with what you remember. So in the biggest LSU vs Bama game ever, on the biggest play of the game, an official who wants Bama to win makes the call of INT on a play where everyone thought it was a Bama completion at first?
Ye, that one play really makes up for all the bullshite. What were they going to do, frick us on an INT review twice?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:07 am to SweetTeaOnionRings
Thread #29 already this week on this stupid shite
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:08 am to ATLTiger
Its more about when the flags are thrown. The unsportsmanlike call last year should have been offsetting are not called at all. And just after a TO and momentum changer to make it look even more suspicious. Its about the hows and whens, not the raw numbers.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:08 am to lsupride87
quote:
You are an idiot. The Ritter crew in 2011 against Bama was fantastic. The Reid INT play would have been called a Bama completion by 99% of officiating crews
first off REid came down with the ball, In what universe would that be called a completion?
2nd off, a lot of media became aware of the SEC ref bias prior to that game which was billed as 'the game of the century'. Big media spotlight was on his crew. Made it much harder for him to do his 'dirty work'.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:09 am to boxcar willie
quote:Alright, im done. Cant argue with this type of insanity
2nd off, a lot of media became aware of the SEC ref bias prior to that game which was billed as 'the game of the century'. Big media spotlight was on his crew. Made it much harder for him to do his 'dirty work'.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:09 am to TangipahoaTiger
Julio did not touch the ball. That is part of Negatiger rantardation lore.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:09 am to LNCHBOX
Cute South Park gifs dont change the rules.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:10 am to lsupride87
quote:
Well if he truly is biased absolutely. That is the problem with yalls theory. You are selective as shite with what you remember. So in the biggest LSU vs Bama game ever, on the biggest play of the game, an official who wants Bama to win makes the call of INT on a play where everyone thought it was a Bama completion at first?
I'm not seeing how him getting one call right makes him unbiased.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:10 am to Canwoodtiger
quote:
Julio did not touch the ball. That is part of Negatiger rantardation lore.
It is actually made up by Alabama fans because they have no explanation for that play beyond something fishy going on.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:10 am to TangipahoaTiger
quote:
Cute South Park gifs dont change the rules.
Can you provide a link to the rule where it says the ball is dead?
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:14 am to LNCHBOX
quote:So if he gets a call right or one wrong against Bama it means nothing, but a call against LSU proves he is BIASED!!!!!
I'm not seeing how him getting one call right makes him unbiased.
That is selective
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:14 am to Alt26
quote:
It's a systemic problem under Miles.
Saban's teams at LSU weren't the most disciplined teams when it came to penalties. Then all of a sudden he gets back to the college game at Alabama and his teams become some of the least penalized teams? Incredible!
Granted, this year, I think they are doing pretty poorly on the penalty front.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:15 am to lsupride87
quote:
So if he gets a call right or one wrong against Bama it means nothing, but a call against LSU proves he is BIASED!!!!!
There have been more against LSU controversial calls than for. SO unless you have a long list greater than 1 call, you're not making the point you had hoped to.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:16 am to LNCHBOX
Ritter has to pick his moments. Perhaps he and his crew felt Bama could win without much help? Or, was a rematch always part of the plan? Think about it. Nothing surprises me in sports corruption. Based on what I have been told and what I have seen with my own two eyes.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:22 am to SweetTeaOnionRings
Bug eyed bastard
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:22 am to Canwoodtiger
quote:Ho
Ritter has to pick his moments. Perhaps he and his crew felt Bama could win without much help? Or, was a rematch always part of the plan?
Lee
Chit
Ritter now behind the rematch
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:22 am to lsupride87
quote:
Ritter now behind the rematch
That's a bit of a leap from what you quoted.
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:26 am to therick711
Understood. And then it became part of Negatiger lore after that. You know that in the deep corners of their wretched hearts, pure Negatigers dream that they could have been raised in the Yellowhammer state as a Bammer.
Popular
Back to top


0





