Started By
Message

re: bama got there bag man to the sec office

Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:05 am to
Posted by TrueTigerTale
Zachary, La.
Member since Sep 2011
19318 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:05 am to
I called Jimmy Ott's radio show before the Aub game a few years ago, and told Jimmy that I feared the SEC refs were going to stick it to LSU. I was laughed at on the radio. The next week, following Sec refs public raping of LSU, Jimmy got calls from LSU fans stating, remember the guy who called about sec refs Jimmy, we shouldn't have laughed, he was right, he'll be calling you back.

For some odd reason, I don't fear the SEC refs this time. Maybe it's because we have Superman on our side.
This post was edited on 10/27/15 at 10:09 am
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
26134 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Also, in the cherry picked still shot that gets posted here everyday of the Peterson/Jones play.... look at the video. Jones touches the ball first. Jones was out of bounds.


You obviously didn't watch the video. Jones doesn't touch the ball and is out of the play by the time he is out of bounds. You belong on a Bama board spouting their talking points.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111390 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Ye, that one play really makes up for all the bullshite. What were they going to do, frick us on an INT review twice?
Well if he truly is biased absolutely. That is the problem with yalls theory. You are selective as shite with what you remember. So in the biggest LSU vs Bama game ever, on the biggest play of the game, an official who wants Bama to win makes the call of INT on a play where everyone thought it was a Bama completion at first?
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61723 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:07 am to
Thread #29 already this week on this stupid shite
Posted by Canwoodtiger
Member since Oct 2015
3737 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:08 am to
Its more about when the flags are thrown. The unsportsmanlike call last year should have been offsetting are not called at all. And just after a TO and momentum changer to make it look even more suspicious. Its about the hows and whens, not the raw numbers.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16173 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:08 am to
quote:

You are an idiot. The Ritter crew in 2011 against Bama was fantastic. The Reid INT play would have been called a Bama completion by 99% of officiating crews


first off REid came down with the ball, In what universe would that be called a completion?

2nd off, a lot of media became aware of the SEC ref bias prior to that game which was billed as 'the game of the century'. Big media spotlight was on his crew. Made it much harder for him to do his 'dirty work'.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111390 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:09 am to
quote:

2nd off, a lot of media became aware of the SEC ref bias prior to that game which was billed as 'the game of the century'. Big media spotlight was on his crew. Made it much harder for him to do his 'dirty work'.
Alright, im done. Cant argue with this type of insanity
Posted by Canwoodtiger
Member since Oct 2015
3737 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:09 am to
Julio did not touch the ball. That is part of Negatiger rantardation lore.
Posted by TangipahoaTiger
Member since Nov 2013
1256 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:09 am to
Cute South Park gifs dont change the rules.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89127 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Well if he truly is biased absolutely. That is the problem with yalls theory. You are selective as shite with what you remember. So in the biggest LSU vs Bama game ever, on the biggest play of the game, an official who wants Bama to win makes the call of INT on a play where everyone thought it was a Bama completion at first?


I'm not seeing how him getting one call right makes him unbiased.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
26134 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Julio did not touch the ball. That is part of Negatiger rantardation lore.


It is actually made up by Alabama fans because they have no explanation for that play beyond something fishy going on.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89127 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Cute South Park gifs dont change the rules.


Can you provide a link to the rule where it says the ball is dead?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111390 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:14 am to
quote:

I'm not seeing how him getting one call right makes him unbiased.
So if he gets a call right or one wrong against Bama it means nothing, but a call against LSU proves he is BIASED!!!!!


That is selective
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
25913 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:14 am to
quote:

It's a systemic problem under Miles.


Saban's teams at LSU weren't the most disciplined teams when it came to penalties. Then all of a sudden he gets back to the college game at Alabama and his teams become some of the least penalized teams? Incredible!

Granted, this year, I think they are doing pretty poorly on the penalty front.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89127 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:15 am to
quote:

So if he gets a call right or one wrong against Bama it means nothing, but a call against LSU proves he is BIASED!!!!!


There have been more against LSU controversial calls than for. SO unless you have a long list greater than 1 call, you're not making the point you had hoped to.
Posted by Canwoodtiger
Member since Oct 2015
3737 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:16 am to
Ritter has to pick his moments. Perhaps he and his crew felt Bama could win without much help? Or, was a rematch always part of the plan? Think about it. Nothing surprises me in sports corruption. Based on what I have been told and what I have seen with my own two eyes.
Posted by ELVIS U
Member since Feb 2007
11820 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:22 am to
Bug eyed bastard
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111390 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Ritter has to pick his moments. Perhaps he and his crew felt Bama could win without much help? Or, was a rematch always part of the plan?
Ho
Lee
Chit

Ritter now behind the rematch
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89127 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Ritter now behind the rematch


That's a bit of a leap from what you quoted.
Posted by Canwoodtiger
Member since Oct 2015
3737 posts
Posted on 10/27/15 at 10:26 am to
Understood. And then it became part of Negatiger lore after that. You know that in the deep corners of their wretched hearts, pure Negatigers dream that they could have been raised in the Yellowhammer state as a Bammer.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 21
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 21Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram