- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are you okay with PM's decision to start Chinea every single game?
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:26 pm to ell_13
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:26 pm to ell_13
Just using logic, as a hitter at any level of baseball, would you approach an at bat differently with runners in scoring position? I wouldn't. I'm trying to square the ball up either way.
Now obviously I may approach it different if there is a runner at 3rd and less than 2 outs. But most of the time, I'm trying to do the samething up there that I'm usually trying to do.
Now obviously I may approach it different if there is a runner at 3rd and less than 2 outs. But most of the time, I'm trying to do the samething up there that I'm usually trying to do.
This post was edited on 3/18/15 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:28 pm to josh336
You edited before I could say anything about 3rd with less than two. But you nailed it.
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:29 pm to ell_13
Man we're popular tonight. Have 4 people down voting our posts.
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:29 pm to LSU Groupee
timely hitting is good and all, still doesnt mean chinea should be hitting cleanup over foster, sciv, or hale. you can bring up ONE stat that says maybe he should cleanup (which he's not even leading the team in that stat anymore) and there are several stats that say there are better people for the job.
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:31 pm to ell_13
A perfect example was Bregman last night in the 10th. Once he got 2 strikes on him he was just looking to put the ball in play to the right side.
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:32 pm to TigerCub
quote:
A perfect example was Bregman last night in the 10th. Once he got 2 strikes on him he was just looking to put the ball in play to the right side.
My favorite at bat from the game last night.
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:34 pm to TigerCub
He's doing it all right now. I love it.
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:34 pm to Brageous
quote:
I still have no idea how chinea doesn't have a homer
Because he inside outs everything. I think he has hit a few balls to the right side that would have hit him had he swung through them.
If he would be a little more patient, sit on some pitches on the inner half, and look to pull them it would make a big difference.
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:37 pm to TigerCub
Welcome to the dark side cub.
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:37 pm to ell_13
It is my opinion that one of the best hitters on the team is not even discussed on this board or in the paper. He is clutch and he is experienced.
Here is my question. If a player is on the field every game, how much lower would he hit if he were pulled in and out of the games like a yo-yo? For example, if Bregman were to hit .350 as an every day player, what would his average be if he were rotated in and out of the line-up, as a pinch hitter or a designated hitter?
Here is my question. If a player is on the field every game, how much lower would he hit if he were pulled in and out of the games like a yo-yo? For example, if Bregman were to hit .350 as an every day player, what would his average be if he were rotated in and out of the line-up, as a pinch hitter or a designated hitter?
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:39 pm to Asllan
I'm guessing you mean Sciambra?
Might be a bad one. Zardon?
Sciv? Who hits well no matter where he's put and moved around?
Might be a bad one. Zardon?
Sciv? Who hits well no matter where he's put and moved around?
This post was edited on 3/18/15 at 8:41 pm
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:40 pm to Asllan
Tough to say. Some players have better numbers because they can excel in a specific, limited role and would drop off if they played every day.
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:49 pm to MOT
quote:
Some players have better numbers because they can excel in a specific, limited role and would drop off if they played every day.
Can you give me an example?
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:55 pm to Asllan
Just gonna leave me hanging? 
Posted on 3/18/15 at 8:57 pm to Asllan
quote:
Here is my question. If a player is on the field every game, how much lower would he hit if he were pulled in and out of the games like a yo-yo?
This reminds me of the way Coach played Tyler Moore. I always felt like when Moore was getting into a groove, Coach would bench him for making a base running error or something.
Posted on 3/18/15 at 9:05 pm to Asllan
Raph Rhymes told me that it raises your batting average a hundred points when you get to play every day. I believe that.
What we have is roughly 8 players moving in and out, depending on the situation. Every one of those batting averages would go up if given the opportunity to play every day.
What we have is roughly 8 players moving in and out, depending on the situation. Every one of those batting averages would go up if given the opportunity to play every day.
Posted on 3/18/15 at 9:06 pm to Asllan
Ummmmm.....how do I put this.........no, he is wrong. Thats as nice as I can put it.
Posted on 3/18/15 at 9:09 pm to Asllan
That's not true. Krob played everyday and he couldn't crack .250.
Posted on 3/18/15 at 9:12 pm to Asllan
Agree with the bump in average but not by 100 points.
Posted on 3/18/15 at 9:13 pm to BayouBengals18
quote:
That's not true. Krob played everyday and he couldn't crack .250.
I am not saying the +.100 thing is true, but this is not an argument against it. Under the premise, KRob would hit .150 if not a regular. Maybe we'll see.
Popular
Back to top



2





