Started By
Message

re: Are LB too small?

Posted on 9/30/13 at 7:08 pm to
Posted by UnAnon
Breaux Bridge
Member since Sep 2013
6436 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 7:08 pm to
Lamar was like 235 in Highschool. Absolutely no way he is 216 now.
Posted by Tiger in Texas
Houston, Texas
Member since Sep 2004
20936 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

Beckwith 246


Another reason he should be on the field...
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

Welker 226

Really?

Damn, that's the smallest looking 226 pound human I've ever seen. Where's he hide it? Dude must have a giant cock.
Posted by tubucoco
las vegas, nevada
Member since Oct 2007
32994 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

I don't think size is an issue.
Size is always a issue if you ever played football. The bigger someone is the harder they fall, but they are also hard as frick to bring down! Chavis most effective LB under his reign was a regular sized LB. Minter who was 6'1 245.

I don't like this system he has of using these undersized players at LB because LSU will continue to get gashed on the run. They are easy as frick for massive OLineman to move out of the way of RB's. He claims he puts them in for speed, but what good is this so called speed adavantage done so for? Only Kwon Alexander has gotten behind the line a few times.
This post was edited on 9/30/13 at 8:03 pm
Posted by Dudebro2
San Diego
Member since Dec 2011
8967 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

Size is always a issue if you ever played football.


That is absolutely not true!!

Yes I have played football, and played against plenty of dudes that are bigger and slower and they didn't do shite. You have to be athletic also. Unless you are just clogging the middle, you can't just be big you have to be athletic and be able to move otherwise a good coach can figure out a game plan.

This post was edited on 9/30/13 at 10:44 pm
Posted by DrakeLSU
Kansas
Member since Dec 2012
1348 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 8:23 pm to
While they have been unimpressive as a unit, I have been very unimpressed with Welter.
Posted by tubucoco
las vegas, nevada
Member since Oct 2007
32994 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 8:26 pm to
I'm not talkin about big, slow, unathletic neanderthals you may have played against in high school. If you played in HS. Those types don't go on to college ball. I'm talkin about the ones that can move and will move and knock your arse out if you aren't careful!
Posted by mytigger
Member since Jan 2008
14863 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 8:29 pm to
It's not that they're small it's that they're slow. The only exception is Kwon.
Posted by 11thACR
Atlanta, Georgia
Member since Mar 2012
1652 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 8:31 pm to
LB have enough size....if the DL helps keep the OL blocks off them...that didn't happen Saturday.
Posted by cajunjim
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Sep 2006
364 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 8:40 pm to
Kwon is the smaller linebacker and he played well. Its heart that counts, not size.
Posted by LSUHeights
Member since Jan 2010
457 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 8:43 pm to
There is no way Welter is 226, Barrow is 230+ and Kwon is 220..
Posted by cajunjim
Pensacola, Florida
Member since Sep 2006
364 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 8:44 pm to
Speed kills offenses.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Where does Saban find his 260lb LBs?


You can put 260 lbs on the field when you play a 3-4. For what Chavis runs, I doubt you want that on that in the linebacker corp. With 4 down linemen you want fast OLBs.
Posted by tbonetiger
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2012
208 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 8:59 pm to
These smaller faster LBs are too slow diagnosing plays. They should be engaging Olinemen in gaps plugging holes but instead are being engaged by the Olinemen 2-3 yds downfield and cant shed blocks until RB goes past them.

Dline is doing less penetration too. I cant tell if this is by design because they are worried about LB play or if Dline is unable to blow up blockers. With the size and athleticism of 9 and 90 I'd assume the former.
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
17910 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 9:00 pm to
Being out of place & being inexperienced, but that is very coachable situation there are other positions that would concern me more
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
28505 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 9:25 pm to
Have y'all not watched Chavis defense the last 4 years? He depends on fast LBs and has said multiple time he will not give up speed for size and strength.

Problem now is Welter is slow, and no one is tackling well.
Posted by AGENT225
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2008
665 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

Jones got moved to FB; I would have like to have seen him stay at MLB.


I'm with you there. I definitely would rather see him at linebacker.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16038 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:29 pm to
big and fast > small and fast. Saban gets them because he can. It's not like they are easy to find or that there are a lot of them.
Posted by jtran1988
Corndog U
Member since Oct 2008
5321 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:40 pm to
Minter and Sheppard 40's were 4.8s
I think its just poor play recognition.
Posted by Dudebro2
San Diego
Member since Dec 2011
8967 posts
Posted on 9/30/13 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

Minter and Sheppard 40's were 4.8s
I think its just poor play recognition


I tend to agree with you!!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram