- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Apparel contract with Nike
Posted on 5/24/16 at 8:01 pm to Blktiger
Posted on 5/24/16 at 8:01 pm to Blktiger
LSU is Nike through and through. The only people Under Armour is really stealing schools from is Adidas. Cal is the only brand name school I can think off off the top of my head that switched to Under Armour from Nike recently.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 10:08 pm to Accardo44
quote:
Under Armor sucks! Those helmets suck!

Posted on 5/24/16 at 10:33 pm to SmoothOperator96
Grew up in a Nike fam, but UA dri fit tees are definitely on par with Nike. In this heat, how the dri fits look and feel are what I go by so if the switch was made to UA by LSU, I'd be on board with it.
This post was edited on 5/24/16 at 10:34 pm
Posted on 5/24/16 at 11:21 pm to Breesy9
quote:
Combo of both. Imo, under armor quality has been at least equal to nike for some time.
Do you think the Jordan brand is popular because of the Nike's quality or b/c he's the basketball icon?
I've been out of the shoe game for a long time. The point I was trying to make was that on UA's earnings call, the CEO stated that the reason for the growth in revenue was Curry's popularity. He could have said something to the point of "We've put a lot of effort into improving our shoe division, and athletes like Curry have helped us broadcast our message of being more than just apparel."
Posted on 5/25/16 at 1:58 am to Slippin Jimmy
LSU is “very happy” with Nike, but acknowledged the Athletic Department would listen if another company “swept us off our feet.”
well well, We will see soon enough ..
well well, We will see soon enough ..

Posted on 5/25/16 at 6:13 am to Froman
All (of both companies) of their products are made by kids in China, Vietnam, Guatemala, etc using the same materials at factories probably across the street... UA seems to have better designs these days
Posted on 5/25/16 at 6:14 am to pellietigersaint
LSU should go Russell or Champion
Posted on 5/25/16 at 9:27 am to TigersCajuns
Nike's designs for the most part have gone to shite after landing NFL contract.
Posted on 5/25/16 at 10:13 am to The Hurricane
It is pretty weird how if LSU is considered one of Nike's flagship schools, they wouldn't even outfit the football team in the newest mach speed jerseys.
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:53 am to Rickety Cricket
quote:
they wouldn't even outfit the football team in the newest mach speed jerseys.
That has nothing to do with flagship schools. The cut of the mach speed template would not allow for the striping on the jersey.


Posted on 5/25/16 at 5:45 pm to Breesy9
quote:
And the "service academies" are better than playing teams like McNeese 2-3x a year
Navy yes, Army no. Army has 3 winning records in the last 25 years and only 1 in the last 20 years. The days of Mr. Inside and Mr. Outside are long gone.
Posted on 5/25/16 at 5:52 pm to Lucky_Dog
I prefer UA shoes
I was a long time Nike supporter until recently
I was a long time Nike supporter until recently
Popular
Back to top
