re: All WW Had To Do Was Attend A Meeting

quote:

---

Because they (and FKIng) are contractually required to include the NCAA AND cooperate.

---

There was no ncaa investigation.

quote:

---

Think about this, what was WW thinking when his team was loading the bus for the tournament?

---

Trying to remember what was said in other phone calls that could have been recorded, how to avoid further interaction with the FBI, the best strategy to walk away with the 9 million dollars, and what will be left after paying the lawyers.

quote:

---

WW and LSU have a contract. IDK the terms but they should be available.

---

Wade's contract:

LINK

quote:

---

So.....You call an employee to a meeting who you have circumstantial evidence he has been stealing from the business. He refuses to attend. What do you do?

---

Now you are falsely equating Wade's situation to criminal conduct?
Really?
Wow!

Look, I'm amazed you were audacious enough to return to the thread at all, much less double down on stupidity you've already posted.
But that's where we are.


So since you went with a hypothetical,
let's at least adjust it to make it more similar to this circumstance:

quote:

---

So.....You call an employee to a meeting who you have circumstantial evidence has had an affair with someone from the business.

---

.....You have also received "several" anonymous #metoo complaints. Some concern this employee, who happens to be a superb worker .... the best you have had at the company in 20yrs. You schedule a meeting with him to discuss it.

Then you learn he and his wife are currently going through a divorce.

You learn that because the wife's nasty attorney has tried to publicly embarrass the employee. In that vein, her lawyer sent you transcripted out-of-context excerpts of tape recorded conversations which he claims to be evidence of your employee "fooling around". He sent those to you as part of an effort to pressure the employee into a favorable divorce settlement with his client.

Given the "new information", and just to cover bases regarding "pattern of behavior", you decide to invite the wife's attorney to listen-in on your scheduled meeting, and interact via speakerphone.

Your own attorney advises you that the wife's attorney could surreptitiously record the meeting. Then in the Divorce Proceeding he could question your employee under oath about forgettable meeting details. During that civil trial (aka divorce proceeding), if your employee were to misremember details of the meeting or become confused about them, and his testimony seemed at odds with the recording, he could be slapped erroneously with a criminal perjury charge. Your attorney advises you that the wife's attorney has a history of doing just that.

You call the meeting anyway, and still invite the wife's attorney to listen-in.

Your employee's attorney advices him not to attend as long as other parties are to take part. He correctly notes the meeting could expose the employee to a perjury trap (i.e., concocted criminality). So the employee respectfully declines anything but a private-one-on-one meeting until after his divorce is finalized next month. Then he says he's happy to attend with whomever you want to bring.

What do you do?

==============

Let me answer for you.
If you are stupid enough to treat the company's most productive employee in a quarter century that way, you should resign, or be dismissed by your own boss.

Go frick yourself you retarded c u n t

In
Now I can say, I was part of the record breaking, down vote thread.

Here's to Wade coaching another 20 yrs @ LSU

quote:

---

God, we have the worst "fans".

---

Your being self aware is important

Fans love LSU. Not some rogue employee that has, to this point, has made us the negative talk of the town.
Theae players dont stay just because wade would be here...some of them "may" know exactly what has taken place. You kust know there are PIs sniffing around in all of their shite.

We FANS live LSU and im damn happy with the protective steps this administration has taken

Sonic MF’r. Now

Wade hit your old lady up huh?

quote:

---

I have not seen WW's contract. However, the NCAA compliance handbook REQUIRES that (cooperation clause) to be included in every coach, athletic director, etc. contract. THAT IS HOW I KNOW.

---

Ok, but is an active investigation open on LSU right now? He wasn't asked by the NCAA to meet. He was asked by Alleva and LSU's legal counsel and they they dropped that an NCAA rep would be there. The NCAA rep was INVITED by LSU compliance.