- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: All WW Had To Do Was Attend A Meeting
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:43 pm to Maverick14
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:43 pm to Maverick14
quote:
Dude I’m gonna state again you keep saying investigation when there is not a investigation!
As soon as the tapes became public, LSU launched an internal investigation. FACT.
1
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:50 pm to Brazos
quote:
How do you know what his contract specifically states?
Because the NCAA REQUIRES that stipulation is in every coaches contract (according to the NCAA compliance handbook).
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:55 pm to Irish LSU Fan
It was an ambush and you know it. Hardly the sort of thing an AD who was proficiently managing the situation would do.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:57 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
That is as False now as it was the first several times you said it. Of course LSU was not obligated to invite the NCAA.
LSU is obligated to report ALL possible violations and advise the NCAA the status of any internal investigations. Please read the NCAA compliance handbook.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 10:00 pm to tigertex1992
quote:
It was an ambush and you know it. Hardly the sort of thing an AD who was proficiently managing the situation would do.
So now it's an ambush. WOW. By "managing" I'm sure you mean covering up and sweeping things under the rug until the NCAA rings your doorbell. LSU "could" have chosen to operate that way but the possible increase in the severity of sanctions does not justify that path (unless you are just plain stupid).
Posted on 4/11/19 at 10:02 pm to Irish LSU Fan
Dang, approaching 400 downvotes, impressive troll
Posted on 4/11/19 at 10:30 pm to Irish LSU Fan
quote:
ALL WW HAD TO DO WAS MEET WITH HIS BOSS. WE COULD HAVE BEEN IN THE FINAL FOUR AND WHO KNOWS WHAT.
Wrong
Posted on 4/11/19 at 10:33 pm to Irish LSU Fan
quote:
As soon as the tapes became public,
The tapes aren’t public you jackass. A report of what is supposed to be on the tapes is. No one outside of those in the case have heard the actual tapes.
FACT
Posted on 4/11/19 at 11:09 pm to More beer please
quote:
The tapes aren’t public you jackass. A report of what is supposed to be on the tapes is. No one outside of those in the case have heard the actual tapes.
OK then......As soon as the report of the tapes became public.
Is that better?
Posted on 4/11/19 at 11:11 pm to stho381
quote:
quote:
ALL WW HAD TO DO WAS MEET WITH HIS BOSS. WE COULD HAVE BEEN IN THE FINAL FOUR AND WHO KNOWS WHAT.
Wrong
What is wrong....."meet with his boss" or "final four?"
Posted on 4/11/19 at 11:12 pm to Irish LSU Fan
So you admit to spreading lies?
And once the plea deal happens everything is sealed and nothing becomes public. The NCAA gets zilch.
ETA: Your post still says “became” which is past tense assuming they have already been made public. Again, not a single audio tape has been heard by or released to the public.
And once the plea deal happens everything is sealed and nothing becomes public. The NCAA gets zilch.
ETA: Your post still says “became” which is past tense assuming they have already been made public. Again, not a single audio tape has been heard by or released to the public.
This post was edited on 4/11/19 at 11:17 pm
Posted on 4/11/19 at 11:21 pm to More beer please
quote:
So you admit to spreading lies?
Sure, if that makes you happy. You know exactly what I meant. Just because you don't like what I'm saying (and can't provide a cogent argument), just pick apart semantics and levy insults. That's what most (on this board) resort to.
quote:
And once the plea deal happens everything is sealed and nothing becomes public. The NCAA gets zilch.
Keep dreaming. The NCAA will get everything they need (if they don't already have it). Don't forget, the NCAA is not a court of law. If they (NCAA) "believe" it happened, it "did." They don't require any kind of proof, etc. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck........
Posted on 4/11/19 at 11:35 pm to Irish LSU Fan
quote:
could have been coaching both SEC and NCAA tournaments!!!
And all LSU had to do was not a damn thing!!! The NCAA has done nothing, the FBI has done nothing, and LSU suspends the coach on the cusp of an NCAA tourney bid? And for what? He wouldn't meet with them? That's fricking horse shite! LSU's overreacting, national media puppet administration simply panicked and caved in to these media clowns. LSU had no, not one damn legitimate reason to suspend WW. This case was and is a very sensitive and serious legal matter and I don't blame WW for being cautious and keeping his mouth closed. We've all known this matter will probably be over with after his April trial date. But the LSU admin just couldn't wait until then. All this is totally on the LSU admin for overreacting and panicking and giving in to national media pressure!!!
Posted on 4/11/19 at 11:44 pm to Tigers eyes
quote:
And all LSU had to do was not a damn thing!!!
LSU is obligated to investigate the situation and report to the NCAA.
quote:
The NCAA has done nothing, the FBI has done nothing
Yet.
quote:
LSU had no, not one damn legitimate reason to suspend WW.
How many times do we have to explain this? WW (and LSU) are contractually obligated to cooperate with all inquiries concerning compliance matters.
quote:
This case was and is a very sensitive and serious legal matter and I don't blame WW for being cautious and keeping his mouth closed.
When your boss calls you to a meeting (that you are contractually required to attend), you better show up. WW was/is a "potential" witness in a trial. If WW is innocent, why not attend the meeting and say that? However, if you are guilty of something, you may want to refuse to attend a meeting that might incriminate you. Just be honest.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 11:47 pm to Irish LSU Fan
Duuuuuuuuuh
Of course he’s guilty of something
But the NCAA can’t prove itZ
So why is LSU creating a situation like this when again they don’t have to have a sit down with the NCAA at this point?
Of course he’s guilty of something
But the NCAA can’t prove itZ
So why is LSU creating a situation like this when again they don’t have to have a sit down with the NCAA at this point?
Posted on 4/11/19 at 11:53 pm to Irish LSU Fan
quote:
How many times do we have to explain this? WW (and LSU) are contractually obligated to cooperate with all inquiries concerning compliance matters.
Not when your AD tries to ambush you.
quote:
When your boss calls you to a meeting (that you are contractually required to attend), you better show up. WW was/is a "potential" witness in a trial. If WW is innocent, why not attend the meeting and say that? However, if you are guilty of something, you may want to refuse to attend a meeting that might incriminate you. Just be honest.
So you think LSU end the NCAA rep trump the Feds? No attorney on the planet would’ve advised Wade to show up to that meeting.
You’re really ate up with this shite Joe. Good thing this won’t be your problem for much longer.
Posted on 4/12/19 at 12:06 am to MightyYat
quote:
Not when your AD tries to ambush you.
So.....You call an employee to a meeting who you have circumstantial evidence he has been stealing from the business. He refuses to attend. What do you do?
Posted on 4/12/19 at 12:13 am to Irish LSU Fan
Geez just SHUT UP. I don't normally post like that but you're persistence about this is freaking garbage. You're getting people all riled up just for kicks. You're acting like you know all the in and outs of Wade's contract and even if you did, it still doesn't proof a lick of proof that Wade did anything wrong.
You're either a solid troll or one of the dumbest idiots on the face of the Earth.
You're either a solid troll or one of the dumbest idiots on the face of the Earth.
This post was edited on 4/12/19 at 2:33 am
Posted on 4/12/19 at 12:15 am to Irish LSU Fan
quote:
.You call an employee to a meeting who you have circumstantial evidence he has been stealing from the business
Now you're saying Wade has been stealing from LSU? Link?
So first it was "once the tapes went public," which was incorrect, now you're saying Wade has been stealing from LSU?
But you want him to remain the basketball coach.
quote:
I have said that I hope this gets resolved with WW as our coach
This post was edited on 4/12/19 at 12:21 am
Posted on 4/12/19 at 12:40 am to Irish LSU Fan
WW and LSU have a contract. IDK the terms but they should be available. If WW has violated the terms then I assume he would forfeit some/all of his buyout. OTOH, if he's fired without cause, then he can sue LSU for the full amount of his buyout (and more?).
In light of the Yahoo article, WW wasn't going to meet with "his boss" under the UNREASONABLE terms the Admin set. Nor should her.
LSU cannot fire WW because they do not have cause.
In light of the Yahoo article, WW wasn't going to meet with "his boss" under the UNREASONABLE terms the Admin set. Nor should her.
LSU cannot fire WW because they do not have cause.
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News