Started By
Message

re: After reading the story by Ross Dellenger - I feel better about Coach O than ever !

Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:02 pm to
Posted by BayouCowboy
Member since Dec 2012
16403 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

I think you nailed it after that. It's definitely possible. I continually say there is some reason for optimism. For me, until O proves it, I can't expect it though.

That's where I stand. I can see different scenarios where we go anywhere from 6-6 to 10-2/11-1.

I think we will have little margin for error against a lot of the tougher competition and games will turn one way or the other on a play or two.
This post was edited on 3/9/18 at 3:07 pm
Posted by Tiger Ree
Houston
Member since Jun 2004
24563 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

This guy is an oversized 7 year old who throws temper tantrums, cry’s and breaks his toys when he doesn’t get his way. His behavior has trended this way since he was hired.


You surely have examples of his temper tantrums since you said this. Want to name a couple of them?
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
103620 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

You’d have to dig a lot harder than I would to prove your point

Well, obviously. There are more O detractors than supporters. You are making some profound statement here.
Posted by Tiger Ree
Houston
Member since Jun 2004
24563 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Orgeron has surrounded himself with "his guys" because there will be little to no push back on any of his ideas. They are just yes men


This is a pretty stupid thought to have.

You think he has hired guys who suck at their jobs and as long as they agree with him they are hired?

AND not because one has coached in the pros and college and was the #2 ranked national recruiter for the 2017 class?

Not because one of them coached an O-line that gave up 12 sacks in his only year in the SEC? Or only gave up 8 sacks for an entire season with no seniors at USC? Coached a freshmen who was a 1st team all-American?

Who are the people that can't coach who were only hired to be the "yes-men"?
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22797 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

Frank is the most successful coach in UTSA history

They've had 2 head coaches in their program history. I think Frank Wilson is a fine football coach and a great recruiter, but this statement is so intentionally disingenuous it could pass for a CNN headline. Congrats, one of "Orgeron's coaches" is better than Larry Coker.

quote:

Freeze beat Bama twice in his years at Ole Miss

And unilaterally sank the Ole Miss program for years to come.

Are those the only two examples you have, or are there more?
Posted by Adajax
Member since Nov 2015
8131 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

quote:
This guy is an oversized 7 year old who throws temper tantrums, cry’s and breaks his toys when he doesn’t get his way. His behavior has trended this way since he was hired.



You surely have examples of his temper tantrums since you said this. Want to name a couple of them?


Is he talking about Coach O? I thought he was talking about half the Rant.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33860 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

This is a pretty stupid thought to have.

You think he has hired guys who suck at their jobs and as long as they agree with him they are hired?


Where did he say that they suck at their jobs?

But I think it's pretty obvious that he doesn't tolerate a contest of his ideas and wants people he feels "comfortable" with.

"I'm the head coach, we'll do what I want."

He said that.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22797 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

You think he has hired guys who suck at their jobs and as long as they agree with him they are hired?


I never said they sucked. I don't think they were the most qualified for the job though. You can't seriously tell me you think Ensminger is the best possible OC we could have hired. There's no way any sane person believes that.

I think Orgeron would rather hire someone he is comfortable with over a more qualified "outsider."

Ironically, Alleva took the same route and is the reason we are in this shitty situation to begin with.
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
32733 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:17 pm to
doubt he will admit he was totally uniformed on the history of utsa football.
Posted by Stephen1979
Member since Oct 2016
5754 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:18 pm to
Damn right Goldrush! O is the head coach and the program is his now. His staff, his players, his training program, his practice routine, and his preparation methods. No one else getting in the way of coach's planning and playcalling preferences now. I can't wait to see the results!
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38378 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Saban's success is built around his meticulous attention to details, hence his support staff. He gets credit for requesting and using that resource. It's not a knock on him. It's smart business and Bama's willingness to provide those resources facilitates that success. Why don't you understand this?

I'm not saying this is the only reason he's successful. It's a piece of the puzzle.



Right. Because Saban has a vision hires to that vision, and understands the details and nuances of the information that a shadow staff might provide. It's a piece of the puzzle, because the architect of that puzzle is Nick Saban. He is that good, and he knows that much about football, that he can hear 4 different analyses of the "Top Red Zone Offenses" in the country and understand how to either beat them, or be them.

Do you think Orgeron can do that? Does he seem like the type of guy to sit down and scheme around multiple infortmational reports and videos created by his staff?

I would assume Bama's shadow staff does two things:

1) Decreases the informational workload on Saban as he ages
2) Provides even more info for him to make decisions off of

Because he understands it, and knows how to work with it. Now, the other side of that is maybe Orgeron can hire coaches that CAN do those things, sure. O's history does lend any credence to the idea that he can benefit from a shadow staff, workload or not.

Replicating a shadow staff, just to replicate a shadow staff, won't move the needle at all.
This post was edited on 3/9/18 at 3:25 pm
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33860 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Stephen1979


Laying it on pretty thick.
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
32733 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:20 pm to
He actually had me for a moment. I am starting to suspect ree. His coaching tree comment might have been a bit much lol.
Posted by Tiger Ree
Houston
Member since Jun 2004
24563 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

he didn't deserve a chance to begin with. he was totally unqualified for the job. he couldn't even land an interview with syracuse. he's lucky our athletic director is mentally unstable.


Well that explains him building quality and depth on the D and O lines and hiring a support staff.

It must have been the Syracuse thing.
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
71814 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:27 pm to
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33860 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

I would assume Bama's shadow staff does two things: 1) Decreases the informational workload on Saban as he ages 2) Provides even more info for him to make decisions off of


Exactly.

Saban was getting the same results without the shadow staff. He's just delegated that work because as you said, he doesn't have the energy to do it himself anymore.

Why people think a shadow staff is going to allow Orgeron to reap better results than he's gotten on his own, I have no idea.

It's like thinking you're going to be a better chef because you're cooking on a more expensive stove and you have fresher ingredients. Or you'll golf better because you have new clubs. Jordan Speith would still dominante with old rusted clubs from the 1960s and I couldn't golf if you gave me the best clubs on the market.

You still either know how to do your job or you don't. The support staff is only a tool for him to implement his own ideas. And he still has no unique ideas from what I can tell.
This post was edited on 3/9/18 at 3:57 pm
Posted by BayouCowboy
Member since Dec 2012
16403 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

Right. Because Saban has a vision hires to that vision, and understands the details and nuances of the information that a shadow staff might provide. It's a piece of the puzzle, because the architect of that puzzle is Nick Saban. He is that good, and he knows that much about football, that he can hear 4 different analyses of the "Top Red Zone Offenses" in the country and understand how to either beat them, or be them. Do you think Orgeron can do that? Does he seem like the type of guy to sit down and scheme around multiple infortmational reports and videos created by his staff? I would assume Bama's shadow staff does two things: 1) Decreases the informational workload on Saban as he ages 2) Provides even more info for him to make decisions off of Because he understands it, and knows how to work with it. Now, the other side of that is maybe Orgeron can hire coaches that CAN do those things, sure. O's history does lend any credence to the idea that he can benefit from a shadow staff, workload or not. Replicating a shadow staff, just to replicate a shadow staff, won't move the needle at all.


You may have missed my post on the next page after that:

quote:

I have no issue with your statement. I think what he's doing is a positive move. That doesn't automatically translate into success and obviously the man driving the move doesn't have a good track record. How it turns out remains to be seen and as I've said before our problems lie further up than the HC position
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
32733 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:30 pm to
lol he has completely destroyed our cornerback depth and qb is still a complete question mark.
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38378 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Saban was getting the same results without the shadow staff.


Ding ding ding.

quote:

Why people think a shadow staff is going to allow Orgeron to reap better results than he's gotten on his own, I have no idea.

It's like thinking you're going to be a better chef because you're cooking on a more expensive stove and you have fresher ingredients. You still either know how to cook or you don't. The support staff is only a tool for him to implement his own ideas. And he still has no unique ideas from what I can tell.



It's funny actually. There's a large portion of our fanbase who think Orgeron is some diamond in the rough and just had some tough breaks. And with a shadow staff he can be maybe 1/4 as successful as Nick Saban. Even that sentiment is ludicrous.
Posted by Tiger Ree
Houston
Member since Jun 2004
24563 posts
Posted on 3/9/18 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

I noticed you conveniently ignored the loss to Florida, the loss by 30 to State, the loss to TROY at home, the loss to ND, the clusterfrick that was the Matt Canada situation, the lackluster recruiting class, and the hiring of Steve Ensminger as OC.


Matt Canada did not give up 37 points to MS St and 24 to Troy or the last minute TD to Notre Dame. Those losses were on the whole team.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 38
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 38Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram