- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/18/12 at 9:57 am to Tyger1919
Doesn't matter what I think. OSU had a better resume. That's the only thing that isn't opinion.
Posted on 10/18/12 at 9:57 am to I-59 Tiger
quote:
while you can't do much with the computers
If you look at the 2006 computer polls which allegedly have not been altered since 2005 and compare them to 2011 you apparently can do a lot with at least five of the computer polls.
Posted on 10/18/12 at 9:58 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Questionable win?
By that logic, OSU's double OT loss is just as questionable
Was just about to post that. "Close" interception. Well, the OSU missed FG was pretty fricking "close", so you could say they won that game and were undefeated.
LSU v. OSU
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:00 am to Tiger Voodoo
quote:
Doesn't matter what I think. OSU had a better resume. That's the only thing that isn't opinion.
So your saying a one loss team in the big 12 is a better resume than a one loss team in the SEC?
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:02 am to LNCHBOX
How did OSU have a better resume than Bama?? Losing to Iowa St isnt as bad as losing to the #1 team in the nation? That makes no sense. The reason OSU didnt get into it was because that loss to Iowa St caused them to drop more points than Bama did when they lost to us, because it was to an unranked team. I dont get how someone can say OSU had a better resume...
O and a missed FG is still a miss. Refs dont have to make a questionable call on that. Their kicker missed it, so its a miss. As far as the INT goes, if the call on the field would of been a catch for Bama and they went to review it, the call would still of been Bama catch. Not enough evidence to overturn it for either team. So yes, we were lucky to get the INT called on the field.
O and a missed FG is still a miss. Refs dont have to make a questionable call on that. Their kicker missed it, so its a miss. As far as the INT goes, if the call on the field would of been a catch for Bama and they went to review it, the call would still of been Bama catch. Not enough evidence to overturn it for either team. So yes, we were lucky to get the INT called on the field.
This post was edited on 10/18/12 at 10:07 am
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:02 am to Tyger1919
quote:
So your saying a one loss champion from the big 12 is a better resume than a one loss non-division winner in the SEC in 2011?
That's what I'm saying, yes.
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:03 am to Tyger1919
quote:
So your saying a one loss team in the big 12 is a better resume than a one loss team in the SEC?
No he is saying a one loss team that won their conference, played and beat more top 25 opponents and had the same record has a better resume'
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:03 am to Tyger1919
quote:quote:
Doesn't matter what I think. OSU had a better resume. That's the only thing that isn't opinion.
So your saying a one loss team in the big 12 is a better resume than a one loss team in the SEC?
I would say a 1 loss Big 12 conference champ is better than a 1 loss SEC team that didn't play in it's conference championship.
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:04 am to KG5989
quote:
Losing to Iowa St isnt as bad as losing to the #1 team in the nation? That makes no sense. The reason OSU didnt get into it was because that loss to Iowa St caused them to drop more points than Bama did when they lost to us, because it was to an unranked team. I dont get how someone can say OSU had a better resume...
So your entire argument centers around the game both teams LOST.
What about the games the two teams WON??
No factor?
OSU had better wins that Bama. Simple as that.
If your best argument for a title shot is a game you lost, you don't deserve a title shot.
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:05 am to KG5989
OSU had more wins against ranked teams. They won a tough conference. It's not just about the loss unless you're a Gump.
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:06 am to Tyger1919
You're proving what I said about you being too dense.
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:07 am to LSUFrosty
How come no one bitches about 03 BCSNC
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:08 am to Tyger1919
quote:
How come no one bitches about 03 BCSNC
Are you implying we didn't deserve tp be there or OU?
Because plenty of people bitched about USC getting left out.
Moron.
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:09 am to Tyger1919
quote:
How come no one bitches about 03 BCSNC
LSU and USC both won national titles, so who would have anything to bitch about at this point??
As for the BCSCG, LSU had a better resume than USC, just like OSU had a better resume than Bama.
This post was edited on 10/18/12 at 10:10 am
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:10 am to Tyger1919
Pac-10 didn't have a conference championship game? Oklahoma had to play in one and lost?
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:11 am to LNCHBOX
I have never saw a group of fans cry about shite more than LSU fans. We win yall cry we have to beat a team twice yall cry, fans dont sit in the stands til the last second yall cry. We lost to a better team get over it move on stop crying. If we would have lost and got in the BCSNC against Bama none of you would be crying...well maybe
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:12 am to LNCHBOX
its total BS we had to play bama twice. We beat them, period. They sat on their arse and watched as we dismantled UGA in the SECCG. Hell, we should of lost to bama at bama if it was going to play out that way. We should of atleast had a share of the NCG if they pulled that shite with USC in 03. You should have to win you conference to play in the BCSNCG plain and fuggin simple. LSU should have its 3rd BCSNC
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:12 am to Tyger1919
quote:
How come no one bitches about 03 BCSNC
There is plenty of bitching about the 03 title game. Fact is LSU should have played USC. OU lost their conference title game to K State. It was after the 03 season that Conference champions were supposed to be weighted in the computer polls. Note Big 12 has had 2 non-conference champions play in the title game ( Nebraska and OU)
Posted on 10/18/12 at 10:14 am to Tyger1919
quote:
I have never saw a group of fans cry about shite more than LSU fans. We win yall cry we have to beat a team twice yall cry, fans dont sit in the stands til the last second yall cry. We lost to a better team get over it move on stop crying. If we would have lost and got in the BCSNC against Bama none of you would be crying...well maybe
I'm not crying about anything. I'm just pointing out every hole in every dumb post you make regarding the rematch. I didn't start this thread, but you can be damn sure I'll call out morons such as yourself.
I'll assume by the quoted post you have nothing more to add.
Page 8 of 21
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News