0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 51 Former Senior Intelligence Agents Signed An Oct. 2020 Letter Stating the Hunter Biden..
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:11 am to bamadontcare
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:11 am to bamadontcare
quote:
Good morning!! Yes. I'll be out of town this weekend. I can get you Monday morning between 10am or 10:30am. Send me your address please. Thanks
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:13 am to KCT
quote:
Hell, can't you at least stay on the same side of an issue ? You told SDVtiger you didnt believe them, and now you've flipped.
No he didn’t flip. He said he believed the laptop was legit. Now he is saying that the letter in question was a response to an October surprise, which it was. The latter has no bearing on the former, and it certainly isn’t “flipping”.
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:18 am to OTIS2
quote:
Not a single arrest….not even a criminal charge.
Of the 51 “Intel experts”? That’s because you can’t charge someone for saying that the laptop bears the hallmarks of Russian disinformation. They did not say it WAS Russian disinformation. They were very careful how they crafted that letter - forceful enough to get the Bidens off the hook for the election but not so much that they couldn’t wriggle out of it later.
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:19 am to Penrod
quote:
Of the 51 “Intel experts”? That’s because you can’t charge someone for saying that the laptop bears the hallmarks of Russian disinformation. They did not say it WAS Russian disinformation. They were very careful how they crafted that letter - forceful enough to get the Bidens off the hook for the election but not so much that they couldn’t wriggle out of it later.
Correct.
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This was about winning an election. Admit it.
The NYP article was, and the response was the counter to fulfil the same role.
But wasn’t the NYP article correct, and the response to it lies?
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If Biden wasn't running, the NYP never writes the story for that reason.
Irrelevant to the fact that the lies told in response to the laptop story were meant to alter the outcome of the election.
Of course the NYPs *true* story was meant impact the election, that's how our system is suppose to work. People are suppose to vote in an informed manner.
The democrat machine wanted the voters to vote from an uninformed/misinformed position and activated the deep state.
And yeah, melt over the deep state. But show me the 51 former senior intelligent agents that came out and said that the story was likely true.
You can't because it never happened. It's not going to happen. Because progressives have captured our institutions. Which is the whole point here.
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:28 am to Penrod
More accurate to say the article was correct and the letter was opinions
But the correctness wasn't the point of the comment. Thousands of correct stories fail to make the NYP daily due to lack of interest/demand
But the correctness wasn't the point of the comment. Thousands of correct stories fail to make the NYP daily due to lack of interest/demand
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
More accurate to say the article was correct and the letter was opinions
Those were lies, not opinions.
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:31 am to Azkiger
quote:
Irrelevant to the fact that the lies told in response to the laptop story were meant to alter the outcome of the election.
The election between whom?
The answer to that proves your irrelevant comment to be incorrect.
quote:
Of course the NYPs *true* story was meant impact the election, that's how our system is suppose to work. People are suppose to vote in an informed manner.
What does hundred biden's absolute debauchery have to do with the election of his father?
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:The article was written about a series of messages that implicated the Dem candidate in immense corruption. There is no way it could have honestly been pro-Dem or neutral. Such was the nature of the revelation.
The article was written to attack the DEMs.
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:34 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
The article was written about a series of messages that implicated the Dem candidate in immense corruption
The original articles were about Hunter's debauchery.
The corruption argument, after years of analysis, has led nowhere, so I wouldn't rely on that angle, especially referencing the heat of the moment in October 2020. The lack of evidence hurts the argument that you're trying to make, which was amplified in real time in October 2020.
quote:
Such was the nature of the revelation.
The actual revelations were that Hunter enjoyed hookers and drugs.
This should have no bearing on an election involving his father
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Hardly, since that is exactly what I am addressing. The NYP had no choice but to CYA and verify legitimacy of the materials. Once it did, the NYP had a choice to publish mid-October, or hold the story until after the election. That was the timing. You seem to think they should have held the story.
Again, did you miss the quoted language?
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:bullshite!
The corruption argument, after years of analysis, has led nowhere
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:41 am to SDVTiger
quote:
SFP, Boosie, Beefense, cucksammich, retardgator, LowTsoy etc etc all believed this
Dont forget
Are you more upset that some people didn't believe it? Or that the Trump administration hasn't done anything about it?
because it appears that all you are concerned is the opinion of average Joes on the topic, not that these 51 agents, or the MSM outlets for running this propaganda, haven't faced retribution for lying to the American people.
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:41 am to tigerfan 64
quote:
Has anyone ever produced the actual, physical laptop?
quote:
AI Overview
Yes, the FBI took physical possession of Hunter Biden's laptop in December 2019 after the computer shop owner, John Paul Mac Isaac, turned it over to them. [1, 2, 3]
Do you have any other idiotically stupid questions that you need an answer for?
The Biden FBI had it in their possession for over a year effectively covering up the dirt to protect FJB / Hunter.
I'm certain the fbi could have easily determined it's authenticity so that the 51 spies that lied could have avoided the actual humiliation that they never received.
Yes the legally blind shop owner who publicly stated he couldn't be sure it was actually Hunter Biden who gave him the laptop is the only one to have physically seen this thing. Also Hunter just forgot about this laptop since the shop owner is said to have held onto it from April until December. This is all very reliable
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:43 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
The NYP had no choice but to CYA and verify legitimacy of the materials. Once it did, the NYP had a choice to publish mid-October, or hold the story until after the election. That was the timing. You seem to think they should have held the story.
Dude, no.
My comment was responding to the timing of the release of the response to this story, after KCT dishonestly implied the timing of the letter's release was politically-motivated.
That letter is never released without the NYP article
The NYP article established the timing of this story, not the authors of the letter.
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:46 am to SlowFlowPro
Yeah thats not passing the test
Nice attempt
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:47 am to KCT
Keep re-litigating the past. It’s not gonna help in this election.
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:50 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Yeah thats not passing the test
What?
I'm mocking CBS for admitting the truth about the laptop.
If I took your stance, I'd be saying CBS was wrong.
Posted on 10/19/26 at 7:55 am to SlowFlowPro
Sure jan
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News