re: 2018 is the make or break year for Orgeron: T or F?

It's been right in front of my face all along.

quote:

---

theSaltwaterGuide
Calcasieu parish
Member since Jan 2018

---

Good evening, sir.

I deleted this because it did give out some personal info. I’m no alter. Just a proud LSU tiger and I bleed purple and gold!

quote:

---

Yeah the guy is a O alter troll

---

What I have learned in my short time here is that most when they get stuck start calling names and being hurtful. It’s their way of getting out of a conversation when they can’t come up with anymore generic answers. The alter thing is the last resort as I am sure y’all are done.

It “should” be but it won’t. The O experiment will be given 3-4 years for a number of reasons. First being the administration is already paying enough buyouts & the task of coughing up buyouts for a HC & his entire staff, minus Aranda, isn’t gonna fly with F King, his buddy JBE, & the BOS. Secondly, O is Alleva’s last bastion of hope for keeping his job & he knows the the rope swings for him on the gallows if O is fired. The argument can be made that a HC should be given the time to develop “his” players. In most cases I would have to agree but with O, his record at his last, & only, HC gig, the way he’s handled things so far, the “arms race” that is CFB/SEC, & the fan/booster sentiment towards him already; LSU can’t/shouldn’t risk falling further behind pace by rolling the dice on him any longer than they have to. This fan base is already holding torches & pitchforks, a sub par or, God forbid, losing season next year will be disastrous but he’ll still be given another year-at least. After year 3, with no SEC championships & no playoff contention, the fall of Rome will be upon us-O, Alleva, & F King will all be on the hook & HOPEFULLY the new administration will be hell bent on righting the ship from top to bottom.

T

If it’s 9-3 with 3 competitive losses with a combined 10 points or so I think he will stay. If it’s 3 blow out losses he needs to go. I really don’t see 9-3 with the way the schedule looks though. Especially with Clapp declaring. That’s gonna hurt.

E may be the greatest OC in the history of the game, but what I’m shaking my head about is how the university spent seven figures on Canada (and will spend another seven figures this month with $35k per month more than that every month for the next 20 months) only to fire him after one season while E was on staff the whole time.

If E is the answer, what in the world was the Canada fiasco alll about? Why didn’t O just go straight to E???

This is either the worst management decision in the history of management or the school just flat told O that he could fire Canada, but that it wasn’t going to write a big check for his next replacement with a sexy resume.

Who will hire his replacement Joe “I am the search “ Alleva ?

quote:

---

To be clear, you’re saying if he goes 5-7 he won’t be fired?

---

Yes. I would bet any amount of money he would be given another year.

quote:

---

But if he goes 8-4 or worse, is the regression enough to keep his job? Why or why not?

---

If he goes 8-4 For 3 straight years he won't be fired

quote:

---

Should be 10-2

---

With that schedule? 10-2 would be a top 8 team.

To say we should be 10-2 with all the turn over this year, a new offense, a new QB, is F**king dumb.

Ga and Bama would have 1 loss with our schedule.

If we only lose 2, we could be looking at a Natty in 19.