- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: With Kelvin Joseph leaving, who is left from that 2018 recruiting class contributing?
Posted on 7/18/19 at 1:24 pm to Chalkywhite84
Posted on 7/18/19 at 1:24 pm to Chalkywhite84
Locker cleaned out. He’s gone and there’s no doubt this has to do with stuff outside of football. I thought maybe the Stingley situation was an issue but someone dialed into the LSU program said nothing to do with depth chart
Posted on 7/18/19 at 1:31 pm to TheHat7
Best of luck to the young man. I hope he gets it figured out.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 8:42 pm to geauxtigers87
You already counting Nelson Jenkins out!!! Just know he ready!
Posted on 7/18/19 at 10:31 pm to TheHat7
Kid has bigger issues than a depth chart to worry about. Just hope he gets his shite together before it's too late.
Posted on 7/18/19 at 11:56 pm to bignic26
It was an OK class with role players, developmental players and some starting material. Not nearly as awful as the geniuses want us to believe. 2019 and 2020 classes are just special in comparison to it and the majority of classes we ever had. And that is good thing which is not a bad reflection on 2018 at all.
Posted on 7/19/19 at 9:00 am to Canwoodtiger
quote:
2019 and 2020 classes are just special in comparison to it and the majority of classes we ever had.
1. Most classes are good in comparison to 2018
2. 2019 was a great class, but not better than the majority of classes over the last 10 or so years. In fact it was about average compared to them
3. The 2020 class is not signed
Posted on 7/19/19 at 9:57 am to SoloTiger
quote:
had a few elite guys, a few solid guys, and a bunch of meh.
You just described every class lol
Posted on 7/19/19 at 10:19 am to VolTiger13
Has no one explained to him that running from your problems will not solve them - football or otherwise.
Posted on 7/19/19 at 10:25 am to Lester Earl
Not hardly. The "average" LSU class has a lot more Top 100 and Top 250 players.
'18 class only had 3 Top 100 kids and 5 total HS kids ranked in the Top 250. And one of those Top 100 kids just said peace out!
People said the analysts were way off. They were not. It was weak class and well below LSU standards.
'18 class only had 3 Top 100 kids and 5 total HS kids ranked in the Top 250. And one of those Top 100 kids just said peace out!
People said the analysts were way off. They were not. It was weak class and well below LSU standards.
Posted on 7/19/19 at 2:46 pm to SoloTiger
quote:
Not hardly. The "average" LSU class has a lot more Top 100 and Top 250 players
Yes, hardly. What you describe the class as:
had a few elite guys, a few solid guys, and a bunch of meh.
Is exactly what a usual class at LSU looks like
Posted on 7/19/19 at 7:07 pm to Lester Earl
Wrong as usual man.
But don’t bother looking up other recent LSU classes that typically have around twice the Top 100/Top 250 players in it.
I don’t respect you enough to do it for you.
But don’t bother looking up other recent LSU classes that typically have around twice the Top 100/Top 250 players in it.
I don’t respect you enough to do it for you.
Posted on 7/19/19 at 8:35 pm to SoloTiger
quote:
But don’t bother looking up other recent LSU classes that typically have around twice the Top 100/Top 250 players in it.
What does their ranking have to do with how they end up?
You need to make up your mind
Posted on 7/19/19 at 8:50 pm to Lester Earl
Ahhh...time to move the goalposts.
You must have looked them up.
You must have looked them up.

Posted on 7/19/19 at 9:27 pm to SoloTiger
You were clearly projecting how the class would end up. Then you start talking about HS rankings, and Im moving the goal posts? Wut
Posted on 7/19/19 at 9:35 pm to Lester Earl
Don't ever change man...don't ever change.
You can use recruiting rankings or look back after it is all said and done and the result will be the same. It will prove to be one of the weakest classes in recent memory. It's already 1/3 gone for crying out loud after 1 year.
But keep on calling it a typical or average LSU class if that makes you feel better.

You can use recruiting rankings or look back after it is all said and done and the result will be the same. It will prove to be one of the weakest classes in recent memory. It's already 1/3 gone for crying out loud after 1 year.
But keep on calling it a typical or average LSU class if that makes you feel better.
This post was edited on 7/19/19 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 7/20/19 at 10:12 am to SoloTiger
quote:
But keep on calling it a typical or average LSU class if that makes you feel better.
You called it that. You’re just too dumb to realize it
This is about all you can ask for in most recruiting classes.
had a few elite guys, a few solid guys, and a bunch of meh.
Posted on 7/20/19 at 12:30 pm to geauxtigers87
Baskerville- starting LB, with lots of experience on the field already...
Rosenthal- possibly starting LT, after a successful change of lines...
Clark- will figure heavily into the rotation at LB
Hines- possible starter at OG
Chase- starting WR, with the best hands on the team...
Marshall- will factor into our revamped passing game tremendously this season as our #3 WR
Joseph came into a loaded DB group... not a huge loss here, since he was passed up on the depth chart anyway...
Cotton is an undersized DT that couldn't get into the rotation and was unwilling to wait, probably b/c he knew we'd have some serious talent at the position in the next cycle to compete with...
Smith is behind a guy that's going to start for another 2 years... losing him for depth, sucks, but overall, he wants to be on the field now, and that's not gonna happen here, and i understand him leaving for a chance to play now...
Livingston was a project 3 star, who would never see the field... even from a depth perspective, not a huge loss...
Sheffer, the TE, yeah, he wasn't worth the offer in the first damn place...
Provens could have possibly become a player, but who it wasn't a given... again, not a huge loss...
Dantrieze Scott was just a freak athlete that everyone got all enamored with b/c of what Aranda said about his athletic ability... he just couldn't get the playbook/assignments down to see the field... can't use a guy like that, other than maybe special teams...
so 6 starters/solid contributors, 6 transfers... the others are all still with the team and coming into their own... maybe they'll contribute, maybe they won't, but i'll take them, since they want to be here and they are willing to put in the work to try to contribute, rather than giving up for greener pastures...
i wish nothing but the best to the guys who leave... it would be hypocrisy at it's finest to not, considering we have gotten talented transfers ourselves, so i'm not gonna shite on guys b/c they chose another route... but in the end, the only one that even remotely "hurts" was Smith, and that's only from a depth point of view...
Rosenthal- possibly starting LT, after a successful change of lines...
Clark- will figure heavily into the rotation at LB
Hines- possible starter at OG
Chase- starting WR, with the best hands on the team...
Marshall- will factor into our revamped passing game tremendously this season as our #3 WR
Joseph came into a loaded DB group... not a huge loss here, since he was passed up on the depth chart anyway...
Cotton is an undersized DT that couldn't get into the rotation and was unwilling to wait, probably b/c he knew we'd have some serious talent at the position in the next cycle to compete with...
Smith is behind a guy that's going to start for another 2 years... losing him for depth, sucks, but overall, he wants to be on the field now, and that's not gonna happen here, and i understand him leaving for a chance to play now...
Livingston was a project 3 star, who would never see the field... even from a depth perspective, not a huge loss...
Sheffer, the TE, yeah, he wasn't worth the offer in the first damn place...
Provens could have possibly become a player, but who it wasn't a given... again, not a huge loss...
Dantrieze Scott was just a freak athlete that everyone got all enamored with b/c of what Aranda said about his athletic ability... he just couldn't get the playbook/assignments down to see the field... can't use a guy like that, other than maybe special teams...
so 6 starters/solid contributors, 6 transfers... the others are all still with the team and coming into their own... maybe they'll contribute, maybe they won't, but i'll take them, since they want to be here and they are willing to put in the work to try to contribute, rather than giving up for greener pastures...
i wish nothing but the best to the guys who leave... it would be hypocrisy at it's finest to not, considering we have gotten talented transfers ourselves, so i'm not gonna shite on guys b/c they chose another route... but in the end, the only one that even remotely "hurts" was Smith, and that's only from a depth point of view...
Posted on 7/20/19 at 12:43 pm to chRxis
2015-
Tyron Johnson
Maea Teheuma
David Ducre
Jazz Ferguson
George Brown
Isaiah Washington
Bry'Keithon Mouton
Hanner Shipley
Justin McMillan
2016-
Saivion Smith
Drake Davis
Willie Allen
Caleb Roddy
Travonte Valentine
Sci Martin
Lindsay Scott
Layton Garnett
2017-
Tyler Taylor
Lowell Narcisse
Seth Stewart
*Ed Ingram
it's not like 2018 was WAY overboard with the # of guys we typically lose in any given class...
Tyron Johnson
Maea Teheuma
David Ducre
Jazz Ferguson
George Brown
Isaiah Washington
Bry'Keithon Mouton
Hanner Shipley
Justin McMillan
2016-
Saivion Smith
Drake Davis
Willie Allen
Caleb Roddy
Travonte Valentine
Sci Martin
Lindsay Scott
Layton Garnett
2017-
Tyler Taylor
Lowell Narcisse
Seth Stewart
*Ed Ingram
it's not like 2018 was WAY overboard with the # of guys we typically lose in any given class...
Posted on 7/20/19 at 1:06 pm to Damone
quote:
1. Most classes are good in comparison to 2018
2. 2019 was a great class, but not better than the majority of classes over the last 10 or so years. In fact it was about average compared to them
3. The 2020 class is not signed
Of course, this is how shallow thinkers would think.
The fact is that LM was a great recruiter, but he didn't always recruit needs. Especially towards the end where we began to have depth problems all over the place.
More notably, you can sign the greatest classes ever, but if you are running the same 5 plays over and over, and you aren't able to get top level QB's in your program.... great recruiting classes mean nothing.
Furthermore, O was facing a lot of headwinds early on amongst our fanbace, other coaches negative recruiting, our insanely horrible QB culture, you name it. All of this information was being used against us. Now, the headwinds aren't as strong, he's made a lot of positive changes, he's had success, and it's getting easier for him to do what he does well... all because he's earned the trust.
I don't think the future of LSU has ever been brighter. The primary reason he was the better hire (over Fisher) was because he has failed, learned from it, and he's hungry.
Posted on 7/20/19 at 1:10 pm to chRxis
quote:
2015-
Tyron Johnson
Maea Teheuma
David Ducre
Jazz Ferguson
George Brown
Isaiah Washington
Bry'Keithon Mouton
Hanner Shipley
Justin McMillan
2016-
Saivion Smith
Drake Davis
Willie Allen
Caleb Roddy
Travonte Valentine
Sci Martin
Lindsay Scott
Layton Garnett
2017-
Tyler Taylor
Lowell Narcisse
Seth Stewart
*Ed Ingram
it's not like 2018 was WAY overboard with the # of guys we typically lose in any given class...
Thanks for doing the work here. Maybe they'll shut up (nm).
Popular
Back to top
