Started By
Message

re: When are we going to start bringing in some DEs and OTs?

Posted on 12/26/18 at 10:52 am to
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
35596 posts
Posted on 12/26/18 at 10:52 am to
And let’s be fair......


It’s hard to do the following for OLine and Dline:

Evaluate
Recruit
Develop
Keep the stars here for 4 years.


But when you do, you can expect to have doak walkers, belitnikoffs and o’briens


Posted by mdwilkins
Greenwell Springs, LA
Member since Jun 2011
116 posts
Posted on 12/26/18 at 11:23 am to
quote:

I agree 100 percent. We need to fill our offensive and defensive line with 4/5 star monsters two and three deep on the depth chart. Our weaknesses in the big games has been our inability to control the line of scrimmage on both sides!


We already have that. you need to check the recruiting rankings for the last 4 years.

It is not always about stars. It is about what they do when they show up.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16056 posts
Posted on 12/26/18 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

We need to fill our offensive and defensive line with 4/5 star monsters two and three deep on the depth chart.
quote:

We already have that.


huh, you need to look at the depth chart, especially the OL, and correlate that with recruit rankings, I think you would be surprised. WE are making up some ground but still have a ways to go.
This post was edited on 12/26/18 at 7:59 pm
Posted by ShreveportTiger1987
Shreveport
Member since Jan 2014
5494 posts
Posted on 12/26/18 at 7:59 pm to
Never bruh... they're bypassing those 2 positions from now on. Weird.. right??
Posted by Canwoodtiger
Member since Oct 2015
3737 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 4:12 am to
quote:

Dude, these dipshits aren't part of LSU's fanbase.


Gumpnecks have internet access also. Not only Ukrainian and Kazakhstan bots but there is that spam server farm in Indonesia and the Romanians are good at it too. The Crimson shadow program have long arms and many henchmen. I wonder if they pay the students in their shadow internet program by the post or word. hmmmmmmm....
Posted by xGeauxLSUx
United States of Atrophy
Member since Oct 2008
21847 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 6:47 am to
quote:

When are we going to start bringing in some DEs and OTs?
quote:

It's really sweet that we seem to be bringing in lots of really great DBS, but at this rate, we'll have to start converting them to pass rushers and pass blockers.



3-4 Defense...OLBs are your main edge rushers.
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
13117 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 8:08 am to
They are, in base. The newer variations have gone to quicker, athletic NTs and the ability to pressure with a 4 down line. By newer I mean Bama who does it best. The difference is that they can pressure with 4 down and not bringing extra guys. When they do blitzing they can be beaten in the back end. 4 man rush means fewer in protection and changes coverages. Arandas is not the same as Bamas and by no means do I know better than Aranda but Saban and crew have dominate defenses up front even through staff and personnel changes so take notes.

IMO between DE, NT, DE/DTs and OLBs, we need to bring in 6-8 kids next class. 3-5 DE types with a couple that can move inside, a true nose and 3-4 OLBs with a couple of pure edge guys and a couple versatile enough to move around. Add in 4-5 OL and that's half the class. 2 QBs and 2-3 S and that leaves about 8 spots for skill positions, CB and ILB. Works for me.
Posted by SoloTiger
Member since Aug 2016
10340 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:06 am to
No need for original poster to get slammed for pointing out what is holding LSU back.

It’s line play on both lines of scrimmage.

I sit low in Tiger Stadium so I can get a great feel for the sizes/builds of linemen.

At the Bama game it looked like grown arse men on their Dline throwing around chubby children. Bama’s Oline was massive and looked fit at their waistlines. Almost all of LSU’s OLmen carried about 20 lbs. of fat hanging over their belts.

I’ve come to the conclusion that Bama recruits both a different kind of athlete in the trenches and also trains/develops them better in regards to strength/conditioning.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16056 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:11 am to
You are right that bama recruits better athletes than everyone else as they generally have the #1 ranked class by a large margin.. That is the point in that we and everyone else are trying to close that gap
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22285 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Op has a legitimate question.


Absolutely.

Miles' biggest critics (and Orgeron's biggest supporters) screamed all year about Miles' classes being artificially inflated due to focusing on skill positions and not building depth in the trenches, and about Miles recruiting OGs to play tackle.

Now, after a year where our OL (particularly our OTs) vastly under performed, we only bring in 1 legitimate OT.

I think it is absolutely a fair question and it's an issue that needs to be addressed.
Posted by SoloTiger
Member since Aug 2016
10340 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 1:14 pm to
Yep. I don’t see a future left tackle in this class. Maybe Bradford or Perry eventually end up at RT, but they have the size and feet of run blockers to me more so than pass blockers on the edge.

Parker has the skill set of a future LT...as do Rosenthal and Wire imo.
Posted by whitefoot
Franklin, TN
Member since Aug 2006
11184 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

I don’t see a future left tackle in this class

Aren't they talking about Turner being athletic enough to play LT? Hopefully Parker makes it to campus, too. I was really disappointed to see he wasn't going to sign in December.
Posted by ByrdRBJG7
Member since Nov 2018
151 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 2:59 pm to
Don't see anyway Rosenthal isn't starting next year along with Charles at OT,Wire Redshirted, after having seen Parker in action, don't see anyway he doesn't add 20-30 lbs and play LT, We redshirted 3 pretty highly rated D lineman, have 2 signed and we will sign at least one more, maybe 2, doesn't happen overnight but we are improving in # and quality of O and D Lineman, last O line coach brought in more OL but several guys didn't stay for various reasons(Ingram,Chidi)...We had different starting O lines almost every game this year which is a big deal
Posted by whitefoot
Franklin, TN
Member since Aug 2006
11184 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Now, after a year where our OL (particularly our OTs) vastly under performed, we only bring in 1 legitimate OT.

I think it is absolutely a fair question and it's an issue that needs to be addressed.

Recruiting offensive lines is kind of a crap shoot. It's all about evaluations and quantity. Last year, we brought in 3 legit OT prospects. Two years ago, we brought in 2 and one was top 10. This year, we have maybe 2, depending on how you feel about Turner and possibly 3 if Parker makes it to campus.

Here is a list of the 2017 All-American offensive linemen and their 247 composite rating. As you can see, All-Americans come from everywhere. Only 3 of those guys were top 10 at their position coming out of high school.

0.8144 Beau Benzschawel
0.8731 Orlando Brown
0.86 David Edwards
Unrated Will Hernandez
0.9897 Mitch Hyatt
0.928 Mike McGlinchey
0.9707 Quenton Nelson
0.8361 Cody O'Connell
0.8547 Chukwuma Okorafor
0.9165 Billy Price
0.8913 Frank Ragnow
0.9699 Braden Smith

We just need to get the best 4-6 guys we can get every year and develop them into quality players, and not worry so much about their recruiting rating.
Posted by SoloTiger
Member since Aug 2016
10340 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:06 pm to
I agree there is a pretty high miss rate along OL. That’s why 4-5 are a must every class.

I prefer loading up on OT types as opposed to OG. Much easier to slide from OT to OG than the other way around.
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
14026 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:23 pm to
Bring this to the Rant where everyone hates O. Recruiting board is for actual information and positive LSU things.
This post was edited on 12/27/18 at 9:31 pm
Posted by mhc4tigers
Member since Aug 2016
4479 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 11:34 pm to
Perhaps. IMO we have fallen behind in strength quickness and explosion. When we rushed fourvagainst TAM. All it was was D White running through a gap and easily being picked up. It happened over and over. From the Bama game on we got little if any pressure on any QB.

We will not beva final four team next year if we cannot figure out how to pressure QBs.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16056 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 11:58 pm to
quote:

Perhaps. IMO we have fallen behind in strength quickness and explosion.


yes, recruiting better players is important. it looks like that is what Orgeron is trying to do with his recruiting classes while Miles was seeking out the weeker, slower, less explosive players to recruit in his classes. Good thing that those 'in the know' fans know that bigger stronger faster is better to recruit than the smaller weeker slower ones
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 6:37 am to
quote:

bigger stronger faster


It seems like coach O said just that in a speech before the season started. That being said Moffit may need to tweak his conditioning program.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
17686 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 8:45 am to
quote:

It seems like coach O said just that in a speech before the season started. That being said Moffit may need to tweak his conditioning program.
It is about to come front and center in this offseason.

Not just Moffit either. Position coaches and their role in S&C in the offseason also.

NOT saying Moffit firing is imminent, but there has to be a firm plan that follows a re-visited strategy and exactly what the plan is. Anyone who thinks the 'old ways' of doing things is at risk.

You win the season in the offseason- and that is especially true in CFB because it includes recruiting with S&C.

The think to remember, they are co-dependent somewhat. One big draw to a school (recruiting pitch and/or factor) is how good the nutrition, medical, and S&C program is.

We all reference the downward spiral of wins vs. recruiting. Insert as part of that spiral S&C

Instead of lose games -> worse recruiting look at it this way:
poor S&C -> lose games -> bad S&C program -> lose recruits.

There probably isn't a single 5* out there that isn't a gym rat to some degree. They know what the combine drills are. It is important- the perception of the S&C and the real world results.
This post was edited on 12/28/18 at 8:51 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram