So Evans missed the first half of his Playoff game because................

quote:

---

And does not speak English...

---

To be fair, this is a characteristic shared by almost all SEC fanbases outside of Vanderbilt.

This is the first I'm hearing of him missing the first half of that game.

I check in and out with recruiting, nowadays. Too much drama to try to follow daily innuendo.

quote:

---

Some of you CNN'd....s

---

Love this quote

Is he trying to get a qualifying score?

---------------------------------------------------------

He might just be trying to improve the number of options he could attend. I do know that Stanford doesn't take any student that passes the minimum nor does Georgia Tech. Here is a list of the top 100 Major College Football academic rankings by USNews. As one likely anticipates, the best academic schools are like the Ivy's and other private schools that certainly don't play at the highest level of football [some don't even have football programs]. Remember that the NCAA is looking at athletic admissions to elite academic institutions through a microscope with all of the FBI pursuit presently going on.

#6. Stanford [Athletic ACT floor being a 24]
#9. Northwestern ACT floor being a 28
#10. Duke ACT floor being a 27
#15. Notre Dame / Vanderbilt ND floor 24/Vandy 27
#20. UCLA
#22. CAL / USC
#25. Michigan
#27. Wake Forest
#28. Virginia
#29. Georgia Tech / UNC
#34. Florida
#46. Wisconsin
#48. Illinois / Texas
#50. Georgia
#54. Ohio State / Syracuse
#57. FSU / Penn State / Purdue / Miami / Pitt
#62. Washington
#64. Maryland
#70. Clemson / Texas A&M / Minnesota
#74. Virginia Tech
#77. BYU
#79. Baylor / Indiana
#84. Michigan State / NC State / Iowa
#97. TCU

If he doesn't sign at the early period, he may be waiting on his scores to appreciate all the options where he'd qualify [which might even include A&M].

quote:

---

Love this quote

---

ACT is usually 8am-noon.

What time was his game?

quote:

---

You are the one creating dissension by injecting politics into the recruiting board. No reason at all to inject CNN or Fox News topics into a football discussion.

---

Look paper Tiger, people on here were talking junk about the kid's character, saying he was being disciplined by the coach...even saying "we should pass on him"

I said in that thread, hold on to your judgement, "don't speculate what you don't know for sure"... like the panelist do on CNN for ratings

I am sorry you can't accept the point I am making without trying to say I am being political...

quote:

---

I said in that thread, hold on to your judgement, "don't speculate what you don't know for sure"... like the panelist do on CNN for ratings

---

Hey friend, I am just so tired of politics. I assume when I see someone post something derogatory about Fox they lean left and when they post something derogatory about CNN, they lean right.

So a post digging at CNN is most times a dig at those who lean left and a post digging at Fox is a mostly a dig at those who lean right.

So whether you intended your post to be political, you can see how it’ could be taken that way, right?

For whatever it’s worth my views on political postings on football boards have nothing to do with which way people lean. I actually respect that people have differing views. My response would have been no different had you made a dig at Fox News. I am just so freaking tired of political division and don’t want to see it migrate into my football.

He is cancer let him go to A&M