- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/6/13 at 10:08 am to 337Cajun
quote:
Is this one of those point/counterpoint things where tomorrow they will provide 9 reasons why Fournette will choose LSU?
lol pretty sure they will. And honestly, it's probably gonna be piss poor accurate. I'd rather someone on here write that article.
Posted on 8/6/13 at 10:21 am to 337Cajun
If you're going to the BR for serious journalistic credibility then you're a fool. The articles are written by wanna-be sports writers who are really just fans like you and I. Their opinions carry as much weight as your next door neighbor's. Hell, save your time and go ask him where he thinks LF will end up.
Posted on 8/6/13 at 10:28 am to 337Cajun
quote:
Yikes! The bleacher report as horrible as they normally are doesn't realize that we posses those same qualities as Bama yet better at some, aka intense fan support and playing against talented defenses during practice. You're paddling upstream BR
What your dumbass fell to realize is that they already did one for LSU. Stupid arse!
Posted on 8/6/13 at 10:31 am to Tigerpaul1969
quote:
Is this one of those point/counterpoint things where tomorrow they will provide 9 reasons why Fournette will choose LSU?
They already did, LSU's was first.
They've done it with a bunch of different players saying what this one or that one brings to the table and they usually state that most schools that are in the guy's top have basically the same things but LSU's is so similar, all you can claim that are better is the recent first round RBs and OLs.
Posted on 8/6/13 at 10:35 am to 337Cajun
Nearly all of those reasons can be said about LSU.
Posted on 8/6/13 at 10:37 am to BuccWildBammer
Nothing wrong with bleacher report until they write an article y'all don't like...
Posted on 8/6/13 at 10:39 am to safetyman
Not a single click was given that day
Posted on 8/6/13 at 10:40 am to 337Cajun
lol my bad DBB, no need to get all Tuesday on me
Posted on 8/6/13 at 10:42 am to redfieldk717
quote:
not going to read
Posted on 8/6/13 at 11:12 am to High C
the ultimate goal for players is the NFL. players like LF is gonna make it to the NFL regardless of what school they go to.
please don't get too specific
please don't get too specific
Posted on 8/6/13 at 11:15 am to 337Cajun
lmao yall can whack my OP if yall want. That SOB was a big fail. I take full responsibility for this shame 

Posted on 8/6/13 at 11:18 am to loopydj
quote:
the ultimate goal for players is the NFL. players like LF is gonna make it to the NFL regardless of what school they go to.
Posted on 8/6/13 at 11:21 am to RBWilliams8
quote:
Nothing wrong with bleacher report until they write an article y'all don't like...
They just don't seem to have much of a review process, and will let any swinging dick submit. Some poster here said he buddied up to some of the people who run it and two months later he was a "writer." It's a fluff site.
Posted on 8/6/13 at 11:39 am to TheDrunkenTigah
Couldn't pay me to live in bumfrickscaloosa
Posted on 8/6/13 at 11:44 am to luvdatigahs
So,Say if BAMA was the only scholarship offer I got,should I go and Would u go or went or whatever time thingamajig u wanna use...Hmmm.

This post was edited on 8/6/13 at 11:48 am
Posted on 8/6/13 at 11:55 am to 337Cajun
Sure BR is fluff and most of those could apply to LSU, but you guys are missing by far the dumbest one.
Since when would a 18 y/old, 5*, #1 overall recruit consider it a positive that he doesn't have to carry the load?
I suppose you could argue having fewer carries in college saves "tread" on the tires when going into the NFL. However, given the fact that Ingram, Richardson and Lacy were all banged up going into the league and had a shite ton of carries in college, that doesn't seem like a legit point in Alabama's favor.
quote:
Offensive Talent on the Roster to Take Pressure off Him
Since when would a 18 y/old, 5*, #1 overall recruit consider it a positive that he doesn't have to carry the load?

I suppose you could argue having fewer carries in college saves "tread" on the tires when going into the NFL. However, given the fact that Ingram, Richardson and Lacy were all banged up going into the league and had a shite ton of carries in college, that doesn't seem like a legit point in Alabama's favor.
This post was edited on 8/6/13 at 11:57 am
Popular
Back to top
