- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Michael Van Buren QB commits to LSU
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:03 pm to Double Down
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:03 pm to Double Down
Playing behind the worst O line in the SEC, against the best defenses in the SEC?
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:03 pm to viv1d
The Bus between the 20’s
The Van in the red zone. Best believe
The Van in the red zone. Best believe
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:05 pm to RBWilliams8
quote:
Does this mean Hurley's out the door? How's that to play out?
Time will tell.. Seems to be indicative of how the staff feels about Hurley
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:07 pm to Nate711
quote:
indicative of how the staff feels about Hurley
Why do people say this? Says nothing about Hurley. Bring in a QB every season regardless.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:09 pm to sunnydaze
Yes he is. His stats don’t reflect it due to having the worst o line in the SEC and getting sacked a lot because of it
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:10 pm to viv1d
Damn, that is freaking crazy! That kid actually looked decent at Miss St despite having no chance vs top teams, inexperience, and a first year HC. Go watch him vs UGA. He was a true freshman. This gives us an experienced backup and talented guy to compete with Hurley.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:12 pm to HighRoller
From the coaches perspective, yes.. If you are a kid like Van Buren who just started an entire season, you aren’t transferring to COMPETE for the back up spot unless someone has made you feel like it’s yours
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:12 pm to Salviati
quote:
Well, 69 attempts for -12 yards last year (YPC -0.17). Sure, sacks count against rushing yards in college, but those numbers do NOT indicate that he's a big threat to run.
Watch film
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:14 pm to r0cky1
quote:I found some HS film and it looks like he has some wheels.
Watch film
Please give me MOAR film.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:21 pm to MrWiseGuy
quote:
Love that he gets to come here for a season to watch, learn and get better. Then take over in 2026 with starting SEC experience — at Texas, at UGA, at Ole Miss
Watch? The best player should play, if he's better than the other guy he will.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:22 pm to Nate711
quote:
Time will tell.. Seems to be indicative of how the staff feels about Hurley
Was potentially bringing in Underwood indicative of how the staff felt about Hurley? This is just to replace Underwood as the one QB they bring in this year.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:30 pm to MikeTheTiger71
That had nothing do with Hurley and more about how good Underwood is.. Kind of an apples to oranges comparison. Nobody on this board was talking about Hurley ever playing over Underwood, were they??
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:34 pm to Double Down
quote:he had 69 carries for -12 yards. Nuss had 33 carries for -45 yards. Van Buren had over twice as many carries, yet lost almost 4 times LESS yardage than Nuss.
He has negative yards rushing in the season and you think he’s mobile? Your seem smarter if you said nothing at all.
It's obvious that if he runs the read option here, he will run. He will take a wide open rush lane. Im not saying he's a dual threat, but im pretty sure he's more mobile.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:44 pm to Nate711
quote:
That had nothing do with Hurley and more about how good Underwood is.. Kind of an apples to oranges comparison. Nobody on this board was talking about Hurley ever playing over Underwood, were they??
So if they didn’t have a commitment from Underwood, you don’t think they would have recruited a QB this year? You have to take a QB every year because you never know who is or is not going to develop. All this says is that Hurley isn’t a sure fire QB1 yet. It doesn’t mean he’ll never be one or that the staff doesn’t think he can develop. They just can’t sit back and hope that he does. They have to have options.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:46 pm to viv1d
Hopefully we can use him in the red zone this year too as a running threat.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 1:50 pm to Blast and Laugh
quote:
5 Star out of HS, committed to Oregon for a long time.
Didn’t realize this but definitely not surprised. Watched him play a couple of times this year and was very impressed.
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:04 pm to Wichita Co Tiger
Looks more like Collins than Hurley
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:05 pm to MikeTheTiger71
No shite.. All I said is that it seems to indicate some doubt with how the staff feels about Hurley being ready to be the #2 next season.. Which you pretty much just agreed with lol
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:15 pm to Nate711
Wonder if we can get his teammate Mario Craver out of the portal too who was his WR2 and a true freshman this season also
Posted on 12/15/24 at 2:20 pm to Nate711
quote:
No shite.. All I said is that it seems to indicate some doubt with how the staff feels about Hurley being ready to be the #2 next season.. Which you pretty much just agreed with lol
It’s longer term than that. If they were only looking at next season, they’d probably just stick with Swann or bring in an upperclassman. This is about a potential QB1 in 2026 and beyond.
Popular
Back to top
