re: LSU not going after Amik Robertson still angers me

quote:

---

Rotation guy my arse.. He would be starting for us

---

He didn’t say Cooper was a rotation guy. Can you learn to read before you blow your top. He said “at least a solid rotation guy”, which I think is an accurate way to put it. I don’t think he’s better than Penn or Speights, but with the latter injured, Cooper would probably be starting.

quote:

---

don’t think he’s better than Penn or Speights, but with the latter injured, Cooper would probably be starting.

---

Cooper is much better than penn.

quote:

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

When was the last time a Rummel player didn't pan out?

---

That's a bullshite question.

---

How is that a BS question? I'm simply implying that Rummel guys seem to have successful careers at LSU. I can't recall one that didn't besides Koy Moore. Which also implies that if Rummel has a star player LSU should recruit them because they will be good players for LSU i.e. Diggs, Steltz x2, Lonergan, Chase, Fulton,etc

---

Because LSU didn't offer Kaufman. Hell, most of the SEC did not offer Kaufman. His only SEC offers were Ole Miss and Vanderbilt. Not exactly SEC leaders or legends.

You're comparing a kid who wasn't offered by LSU to kids who were offered, and signed by, LSU. That's the wrong comparison.

Your question suggests that all Rummel players do well at LSU so LSU should offer all Rummel players. Your question could be applied to any Rummel player. You know that logic is bullshite.

Accordingly, the question is NOT, "When was the last time a Rummel player didn't pan out?"

The question is "How many times has LSU not offered a Rummel player who became a player LSU should have offered and how does that number compare to the number of Rummel players that LSU was correct not to offer?"

quote:

---

Kaufman was an lsu target when he left Vanderbilt via the transfer portal

---

Evaluations change.

That has nothing to do with whether it was a bullshite question.