Started By
Message

re: Is LSU taking too many recruits based on camp performance

Posted on 8/22/09 at 1:42 pm to
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
61906 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 1:42 pm to
I'm not against either of those kids BTW. Well...maybe Blackmon instead of Byran Jones who is a 4 star BEGGING to go to LSU. Still don't understand the philosophy here. LSU will get to play him 4 times at either Arkansas or Ole Miss though.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
288334 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 1:44 pm to
well neither had any real big offers, prob could have waited a little bit to see how their SR years went. Granted other teams would have been on them, but that is gonna happen if they play well regardless if they are committed to LSU or not.

numbers are getting tight, and taking kids solely based on a camp could come back to bite them.
Posted by Sonny G
Houston, TX
Member since May 2009
508 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

The camp performance just is icing on the cake. There are other kids they want to see have big senior years before they offer.


That's a great way to put it and excellent analysis.

In my opinion, after following recruiting now for 7 years, that's the way I see it too!

This post was edited on 8/22/09 at 1:48 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
288334 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

There are other kids they want to see have big senior years before they offer.



Not really, at this point. At least in LSU's case.

unless they totally whiff on some of the big names they are going after
Posted by Sonny G
Houston, TX
Member since May 2009
508 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 2:12 pm to
One thing to consider in each person's perspective is this.

Are you looking at these potential LSU recruits from the perspective of who you personally want LSU to offer and have commit or who you think the coaches will offer & who you think the coaches want to commit?

These are two completely different approaches to recruiting from the recruiting aficionado or casual follower's standpoint...

This is often the source or root cause of the arguments and debates on this board.

I like to try and think like the coach, but am often wrong like in the case of Eddie Lacy. I though that Lacy was too good for Miles & Co. let get away without an offer. I was wrong because I didn't know how the coaches felt about the specifics (other variables) well enough regarding character, work ethic, and grades.

We all knew there was a problem, but we didn't know 100% how the coaches felt until Lacy's senior year of football was over and no offer came.

I liked Lacy, but also thought he would eventually get an offer if his grades got better.
I guess I was looking at him from "who I wanted and who I though the coaches would offer". Often times, our perspective contains both view points.






This post was edited on 8/22/09 at 8:54 pm
Posted by LSUDad
Still on the move
Member since May 2004
61848 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Camps are far better than film is the bottom line.


True, most kids are signed on potential. A camp allows to evaluate kids better.

Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
65134 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 2:56 pm to
Anybody listen to the reporter talking about Sam Gibson last night; She said that Sam went to the LSU camp and ran a 4.41 (40) for Les Miles and then blanketed a 5star reciever for 5 straight plays.They then moved him to QB and he threw a TD on the first play.He said Miles then took him to his office and offered him on the spot.He then left for Bama camp,but got sick(jet-lag) and couldn't perform.He then got home and thought about the good vibes he had at LSU camp and called Les up and committed. Don't know who that 5star was,but evidently good ole Sam has some coverage skills against pretty good competition,that his film as a qb don't show.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
288334 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 3:01 pm to
Im thinking from a coaches and common sense perspective.

we are sitting with 22 commits i think


i doubt they are too many kids that LSU hasnt offered yet that they would take with one of the final few spots.


and the ones that they would possibly offer, are LA guys who they have seen a lot of already. They would just be backburner guys at this point
Posted by LSUDad
Still on the move
Member since May 2004
61848 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

How many workout warriors look great at the combine and are huge busts in the NFL?


The list is endless.
Posted by ColtsTigers
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2009
2248 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 4:51 pm to
You guys are overdoing this.

Carter was at camp but doesn't have an offer. Wright and Fobbs never camped, but do have offers. That is one of many examples.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465858 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Would you agree that the combine is essentially a camp?

it is

and this dichotomy of the fans has always cracked me up
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
61906 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 4:55 pm to
I don't think anyone is saying they don't like offers at camp. I think people, myself included, were talking about the 2 guys who were offered STRICTLY from camp and 0 film.
Posted by ColtsTigers
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2009
2248 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 5:02 pm to
The only player offered strictly from camp was Blackmon. You can bet that they watched almost every play Bates and Gibson had last year. They had been recruiting Gibson for months, and that's why he attended the camp.
Posted by LSUDad
Still on the move
Member since May 2004
61848 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 5:38 pm to
Most kids are seen on film by the staff, an invite to a camp is offered. Camps are were measurements are taken, the 285# lineman becomes the 250#'er. 6'3" players are the 6'0" ers.
Posted by Bad Cat
Painted Post, NY
Member since Jan 2004
12091 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 6:01 pm to
After all the years of experience at evaluating high school talent, my vote is with Miles and his staff.
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 8/22/09 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

they should base it on rant evaluations.


i agree with this. we spend way too much money on coaches anyway. if we used rant evaluations and rant based ideas on player personnel and actual plays, we could lay off some of these hi-priced coaches and improve our team at the same time.
Posted by Peachtree Tiger
Member since Jan 2004
3232 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 6:31 am to
Sounds like you have a problem with Miles' decision making regarding offering schalorhsips.

I don't think there are many that have this same opinion.
Posted by judge
Houston
Member since Jan 2008
276 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 7:09 am to
Yes, imo. The camps should be only a part of comprehensive and thorough evaluation, not the end all.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
288334 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

The only player offered strictly from camp was Blackmon


Mathieu was offered based on a 7 on 7 supposedly
Posted by Fisticuffs
Member since Aug 2009
507 posts
Posted on 8/23/09 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

"Put it on tape". Meaning stop yapping and prove it on the field. How about, "The eye in the sky doesn't lie"? Would you agree that the combine is essentially a camp? How many workout warriors look great at the combine and are huge busts in the NFL?


While I agree with this, I'm not sure it's quite the same because more high school players have the ability to emerge from obscurity ..many haven't even played organized football for much of their lives or have not been used correctly or haven't been in a market or classification to get noticed

I agree the formula should be a combination of performance in your high school career and camp performance... it is possible for a kid to perform better in a camp format and on a short-term occassion. The good thing about their HS career is you can see the body of work and consistancy

But, combines and camps have a great meaning because the coaches are able to control the format... they dictate what they want you to show them, which is obviously seen as a great measurement to know what you are getting when you can put forward a series of tests to get a result in a recruit's performance and see skills that you wish to see

Les is obviously a "show me at my camp" guy and doesn't hand out many schollies to kids who don't show up in BR to put their skills in action first hand
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram