- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Inside the NIL Battle That Is Splintering the SEC: ‘We’re All Money Laundering’
Posted on 5/31/23 at 9:26 am
Posted on 5/31/23 at 9:26 am
Very good article from Ross.
LINK

LINK
quote:
Within the 11-state footprint of the country’s most dominant college football league, fairness is fading, swallowed by the greed of competition from the conference’s very own members. Through lobbying efforts, schools have worked with their state lawmakers to feverishly rewrite statutes to give them an advantage over neighboring programs.
New state laws adopted in Arkansas, Missouri, Texas and Oklahoma clear a path for their schools to bring NIL programs more under their proverbial roof while also prohibiting enforcement from the NCAA and others. This new evolution of NIL collectives tests NCAA and SEC governorship, risks federal rules violations and, maybe most important, pushes college sports another step closer to what many believe is an eventuality: Schools paying athletes directly.
quote:
Texas A&M’s fundraising arm, the 12th Man Foundation, made a splash when it announced an NIL offshoot in February.
The 12th Man Plus Fund is an NIL initiative that allows donors to contribute to a fund that distributes payments to athletes. While the Plus Fund does not describe itself as an NIL “collective,” it operates as such while under the university’s fundraising arm. It is believed to be the first distribution model that allows a school’s booster to be that heavily involved in the NIL space.
Donations to the Plus Fund, like those to the 12th Man Foundation, are tax-deductible and earn benefits such as priority points. In satisfying the NCAA’s policy for a quid pro quo, athletes are paid by the Plus Fund to promote its parent company, the 12th Man Foundation, through social media posts and appearances.
quote:
At LSU, the Tiger Athletic Foundation, like the 12th Man, is legally separate from the university. Officials in Baton Rouge are seriously exploring the same model as Texas A&M, but like other schools, they are waiting for any action from the governing body of college sports.
“If the NCAA doesn't do anything on this, we’re all in,” one LSU administrator says.

Posted on 5/31/23 at 9:48 am to Captain Crown
Having the wait and see idea is an interesting tidbit. College athletics will forever change going forward.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 10:37 am to Captain Crown
Ruination of college sports. Just make a mega 16 team league and everyone else concentrate on what college was for - education. Going to be a 16 team monopoly with everyone else looking in. I’m sure SEC top teams would take mark of beast if required.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 11:07 am to 427Nova
quote:
Going to be a 16 team monopoly with everyone else looking in.
So just like it’s been for the past 60 years?
Seriously, less than 20 teams have won the championship in the past 60 years. Why? Because it’s always been a game of the haves vs the have nots. It’s always been a game of teams that payed players highly vs teams that couldn’t afford to or just wouldn’t pay their players big money. It’s just all in the open now and the players actually have to pay taxes on their shite just like the rest of us.
You can’t love capitalism and hate the current state of college athletics at the same time.
This post was edited on 5/31/23 at 11:09 am
Posted on 5/31/23 at 12:24 pm to J2thaROC
While you are correct on the point, there have been 20 different schools to win the national title in the last 36 years.
Extending it to 60 only picks up 4 more schools. So your point is valid. And those four additional schools - Michigan State, Arkansas, BYU and Pitt - are not really title contenders these days, although may change with an expanded playoff and a Cinderella run.
Extending it to 60 only picks up 4 more schools. So your point is valid. And those four additional schools - Michigan State, Arkansas, BYU and Pitt - are not really title contenders these days, although may change with an expanded playoff and a Cinderella run.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 12:58 pm to J2thaROC
Well, call it what it is - minor league farm team for football. Why not HS, middle school, peewee teams? Get the college name out of it and call if what it is. Very little education going on. It’s not amateur athletics anymore. Just quit beating around bush and get on with minor league NFL. No problem.
Posted on 5/31/23 at 5:08 pm to Captain Crown
This is so good for college football
Posted on 6/1/23 at 10:17 am to J2thaROC
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/1/23 at 10:18 am
Back to top
