- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

DK Moore decommitment means we are getting both Lockett and Ffrench.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:11 pm
Read the tea leaves.
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 10:41 am
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:25 pm to 00 Tech Grad
Appreciate the attempt at positivity but it most certainly does not mean that.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:34 pm to 00 Tech Grad
No it doesn’t. All it means is someone is going to pay him more than we will. No need to read anything else into it.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:51 pm to 00 Tech Grad
A good receiver is a dime a dozen. Basically all you need to be able to do is run fast and catch a ball.
Do you want the top rated receivers every year? Sure. Are they a “must get”? Absolutely not. If you get a damn good QB and Oline, you can move the ball with decent receivers and running backs.
Do you want the top rated receivers every year? Sure. Are they a “must get”? Absolutely not. If you get a damn good QB and Oline, you can move the ball with decent receivers and running backs.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:52 pm to 00 Tech Grad
Absolutely does not. I’m not losing optimism though
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:55 pm to 00 Tech Grad
quote:that Texas is giving him more money...as simple as that...
DK Moore decommitment means
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:04 pm to Chicken
quote:
that Texas is giving him more money...as simple as that...
There is no doubt that money is a factor but there is a lot more to it. He has lot's of family in Austin, Sark has an appealing offense, and he will have a 3rd year Arch as his QB freshman year. I know most of this board has convinced themselves that Arch blows and money is the only reason Texas gets recruits, neither are true though.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:11 pm to CaneyLake
Not a fair take. Bryce is way better than Arch. Arch should never have been the #1 prospect in that class. That’s laughable
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:33 pm to J2thaROC
Obviously chase, jefferson, and Marshall weren’t a dime a dozen. I think our wide receiver recruiting under Hankton for the most part hasn’t been very good. I see a lot of people love the guy but I just don’t see what the hype is about personally.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 11:41 pm to brennans flip flops
quote:
Obviously chase, jefferson, and Marshall weren’t a dime a dozen. I think our wide receiver recruiting under Hankton for the most part hasn’t been very good. I see a lot of people love the guy but I just don’t see what the hype is about personally.
Counter point, all those guys were from Louisiana. Since then Aaron Anderson, Chris Hilton, and Sampson have been equally rated talents that haven’t panned out. And can’t really blame coaching cause Nabers and BTJ have been fantastic.
We just need some Louisiana guys to step up again. It’ll happen.
This post was edited on 5/16/24 at 11:42 pm
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:19 am to 00 Tech Grad
More likely Texas gets all 3 than we get those 2. Lockett is the only one not a true NIL recruitment at this point. Also quite simple to figure out Lockett isn't as good as the other 2.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:37 am to 00 Tech Grad
It means LSU struggles to pay top guys NIL. We’ll continue to get beat out just like we have over and over again
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:53 am to 00 Tech Grad
I was only your sixth upvote because I hope you’re right.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 5:54 am to LSUTIGERS8181
We get it. Do you really have to keep pushing this narrative constantly?
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:07 am to GMoney2600
Just report him for spam.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 6:14 am to CaneyLake
DL is dumb as bricks if he thinks UT will prepare him for the league the same way LSU would.
This should not be a surprise though. This dude has flirted with every program imaginable. I know he is always a take, but the whole thing has turned into a bad look for us
This should not be a surprise though. This dude has flirted with every program imaginable. I know he is always a take, but the whole thing has turned into a bad look for us
Posted on 5/17/24 at 11:15 am to BROpaneTANK
I didn’t say he wasn’t a good coach, I just think his recruiting is overrated. Nabors and BT also were coached up by another coach as well, so aren’t exactly a great example. Justin Jefferson was only ranked low because of his grades. Most recruitniks said he should have been a 5 star. Chase and Marshall were I believe ranked 1,2 in rankings. Not exactly the same kind of recruits that you mentioned.
With the run LSU has been on with wide receivers. I don’t see why our wide receiver room shouldn’t look like Ohio States. Which makes me wonder under BK are there positions that he’s willing to spend more on. Positions that BK prioritizes. Definetly o line
With the run LSU has been on with wide receivers. I don’t see why our wide receiver room shouldn’t look like Ohio States. Which makes me wonder under BK are there positions that he’s willing to spend more on. Positions that BK prioritizes. Definetly o line
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 5/17/24 at 2:36 pm to CaneyLake
quote:
Arch blows
What has he done to prove he doesn't?
Posted on 5/17/24 at 2:37 pm to 00 Tech Grad
quote:
DK Moore decommitment means we are getting both Lockett and Ffrench.

We’re more likely to get neither
Posted on 5/17/24 at 2:39 pm to 00 Tech Grad
He’s going to Texas. Lockett will be a battle. I want him and Wiley. Ffrench would be a good one as well
Popular
Back to top
