View in: Desktop
Copyright @2023 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rules
Posted by whitefoot


Cliffs:
25 player "hard cap" is a myth. As many of us have been saying, there was no change in the ability to back count early entrants.
All transfers count against the 25 (transfers, grad transfers, etc).
Dandy Don’s Q&A with Blair Napolitano on 25-Signing Cap, Transfers, Walk-ons, and More
25 player "hard cap" is a myth. As many of us have been saying, there was no change in the ability to back count early entrants.
All transfers count against the 25 (transfers, grad transfers, etc).
Dandy Don’s Q&A with Blair Napolitano on 25-Signing Cap, Transfers, Walk-ons, and More
re: Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rulesPosted by Captain Crown
on 1/22/18 at 11:07 am to whitefoot


re: Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rulesPosted by saint tiger225
on 1/22/18 at 11:27 am to whitefoot

If anyone is wondering, LSU only has 4 spots remaining for this year, as most of us already knew. From the article....
quote:
Dandy Don: LSU signed 21 players in the early signing period, including graduate transfer kicker Cole Tracy. How many more players can LSU sign in this 2018 class?
Napolitano: Four. LSU used all of its allotted 25 slots for the 2017 signing class.
Dandy Don: What are the rules pertaining to signing more than 25 and have they changed? In the past, teams could sign more than 25 initial counters per year by back-counting early enrollees to the previous class if that class had not signed its full 25. Can this still be done, or is back-counting in this way no longer allowed since the rule changes in April?
Napolitano: A school can sign more than 25 recruits provided it did not use all 25 signing slots in the previous signing class. In order to be counted in the previous signing class, the signee has to enroll at mid-term and replace a current student-athlete that graduated in December or the previous academic year. There is a change in the rules. Athletes who sign in a particular class are locked into that signing class whether or not they enroll in that fall. Schools can no longer count gray shirts or players placed in junior colleges in future signing classes once they sign the letter of intent with a particular group.
This post was edited on 1/22 at 11:28 am
re: Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rulesPosted by Awesome All Day
on 1/22/18 at 11:35 am to saint tiger225

quote:
A school can sign more than 25 recruits provided it did not use all 25 signing slots in the previous signing class.
According to ESPN, LSU only signed 23 last year. So why couldn't we sign 27 this year if they can still back count?
This post was edited on 1/22 at 11:37 am
re: Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rulesPosted by oauron
on 1/22/18 at 11:36 am to Awesome All Day


quote:
According to ESPN, LSU only signed 23 last year. So why couldn't we sign 27 this year if they can still back count?
No, because LSU accepted two transfers. Those count to the class from last year.
re: Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rulesPosted by JJ27
on 1/22/18 at 11:38 am to Awesome All Day

quote:
According to ESPN, LSU only signed 23 last year. So why couldn't we sign 27 this year if they can still back count?
Texas Tech Guys Giles and Fehoko?
This post was edited on 1/22 at 11:39 am
re: Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rulesPosted by Indiana Tiger
on 1/22/18 at 12:24 pm to JJ27

quote:
Texas Tech Guys Giles and Fehoko?
plus Moss.
re: Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rulesPosted by TigersFan64
on 1/22/18 at 1:24 pm to whitefoot

Dandy Don is a good guy. 

re: Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rulesPosted by whitefoot
on 1/22/18 at 1:57 pm to Awesome All Day

quote:
According to ESPN, LSU only signed 23 last year. So why couldn't we sign 27 this year if they can still back count?
We had 24 players in last year's class. I'm not sure who ESPN is omitting, but it's either Seth Stewart (quit after a couple of days on campus) of Justin Jefferson (signed late in the summer).
Then, we added three transfers: Moss, Feheko and Giles.
So that's 27 initial counters for the 2017-2018 year. Apparently that was our maximum.
TD Sponsor
TD Fan
USA
Member since 2001

USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor
to Everyone


Advertisement
I know this guy is supposed to be one that knows but I still believe hes incorrect about the transfers. I've poured over many articles and explanations, while also reading the rule numerous times and the way he explains the transfers as initial counters is not how the rule reads. A kid can't be an initial counter at multiple schools. If he is correct then the word initial needs to be removed from the term. The kicker was an initial counter because he had never been on scholarship. Therefore he is being "counted" for the first time or initially.
I also thought that what you're saying was correct, but I now think I was wrong. Looking back, the language in the rulebook is ambiguous at best, and I always just assumed it meant what you're saying.
re: Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rulesPosted by Indiana Tiger
on 1/22/18 at 6:53 pm to lsufanva

The ambiguity in the rule is due to our minds wanting to justify something different; not the rule itself. Take your bitch for example:
It is manifestly obvious that the rule is written from the perspective of an individual school. The limit is 25, not 3200 or whatever 25 times the number of FBS schools is. If the rule meant to exclude someone who signed anywhere else, it would have to say anywhere else like it explicitly does for walk ons of 2+ years.
The rule is pretty clear when you get your head straight. Anyone who signs a promise of or an award of a scholarship counts, except for those explicitly excluded.
quote:
A kid can't be an initial counter at multiple schools. If he is correct then the word initial needs to be removed from the term. The kicker was an initial counter because he had never been on scholarship. Therefore he is being "counted" for the first time or initially.
It is manifestly obvious that the rule is written from the perspective of an individual school. The limit is 25, not 3200 or whatever 25 times the number of FBS schools is. If the rule meant to exclude someone who signed anywhere else, it would have to say anywhere else like it explicitly does for walk ons of 2+ years.
The rule is pretty clear when you get your head straight. Anyone who signs a promise of or an award of a scholarship counts, except for those explicitly excluded.
This post was edited on 1/22 at 6:56 pm
quote:
Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rules by lsufanva
I know this guy is supposed to be one that knows but I still believe hes incorrect about the transfers. I've poured over many articles and explanations, while also reading the rule numerous times and the way he explains the transfers as initial counters is not how the rule reads. A kid can't be an initial counter at multiple schools. If he is correct then the word initial needs to be removed from the term. The kicker was an initial counter because he had never been on scholarship. Therefore he is being "counted" for the first time or initially.
Correct, I agree. Absolutely.
Plus, Seth Stewart withdrew before the season started, he gets to be replaced, and Jefferson signed late - as in outside the 2017 counting period window, albeit after the new annual count/year-long counting window kicked in ... starting with the 2018 class (Not the 2017 class that he was a part of). There were 5 EEs last year)2017) and 3 EEs in 2016 (when not all the 25 were used either, adding to the cumulative back counter credit carryforward.
And transfers not previously on scholarship count but transfers previously on scholarship are NOT "initial counters" and do not count against the annual cap limit of 25 initial counters. They do count against the overall cap limit of 85 counters which is cumulative with initial/first time counters and prior counters, but that's a different cap limit.
This post was edited on 1/23 at 1:25 am
re: Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rulesPosted by cfmalloy on 1/23/18 at 1:29 am to Indiana Tiger
quote:
Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rules by Indiana Tiger
The ambiguity in the rule is due to our minds wanting to justify something different; not the rule itself. Take your bitch for example:
quote:
A kid can't be an initial counter at multiple schools. If he is correct then the word initial needs to be removed from the term. The kicker was an initial counter because he had never been on scholarship. Therefore he is being "counted" for the first time or initially.
It is manifestly obvious that the rule is written from the perspective of an individual school. The limit is 25, not 3200 or whatever 25 times the number of FBS schools is. If the rule meant to exclude someone who signed anywhere else, it would have to say anywhere else like it explicitly does for walk ons of 2+ years.
The rule is pretty clear when you get your head straight. Anyone who signs a promise of or an award of a scholarship counts, except for those explicitly excluded.
They did not totally change the rule, they modified parts of it. They changed the counting window from a 5 month limited window to the entire year. They did not change the definition of "initial counter" - get your head wrapped around that.
re: Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rulesPosted by Fisherchef Jeff
on 1/23/18 at 6:02 am to JJ27

I’ll take em against the count any day
re: Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rulesPosted by Indiana Tiger
on 1/23/18 at 7:31 am to cfmalloy

quote:
Correct, I agree. Absolutely. Plus, Seth Stewart withdrew before the season started, he gets to be replaced, and Jefferson signed late - as in outside the 2017 counting period window, albeit after the new annual count/year-long counting window kicked in ... starting with the 2018 class (Not the 2017 class that he was a part of). There were 5 EEs last year)2017) and 3 EEs in 2016 (when not all the 25 were used either, adding to the cumulative back counter credit carryforward. And transfers not previously on scholarship count but transfers previously on scholarship are NOT "initial counters" and do not count against the annual cap limit of 25 initial counters. They do count against the overall cap limit of 85 counters which is cumulative with initial/first time counters and prior counters, but that's a different cap limit.
quote:
They did not totally change the rule, they modified parts of it. They changed the counting window from a 5 month limited window to the entire year. They did not change the definition of "initial counter" - get your head wrapped around that.
Your mistake is that you think initial counters actually matter in this discussion. In this regard the compliance guy is guilty of using sloppy language too. As you point out initial counter is defined with specific meaning in the manual. The manual also states all the limits you mentioned. But there is one little problem. Because of a new rule, they don't count initial counters for this purpose.
Here is the new rule from a previous post: (15.5.1.9.1). What they count now are signings, not initial counters. Because initial counters can never be greater than the number of signings, the latter reaches the defined limit first and is thus controlling. In this context references to initial counter could be deleted from the manual (there may be a reason for it in other circumstances but that would take a thorough review).
There are only three exceptions in the new rule:
o if Lindsey Scott Jr returned to LSU, he wouldn't count because this would be his 2nd signing with LSU
o the 2+ year walk on
o The rare kid whose college career is over before he shows up due to some unfortunate circumstances. About 10 yrs or so ago LSU signed a kid who injured his neck. We kept him on scholarship. I think after he graduated he gave football a go and maybe played for the Saints.
re: Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rulesPosted by cfmalloy on 1/23/18 at 6:28 pm to Indiana Tiger
quote:
Posted by Indiana Tiger on 1/23/18 at 7:31 am to cfmalloy
quote:
Correct, I agree. Absolutely. Plus, Seth Stewart withdrew before the season started, he gets to be replaced, and Jefferson signed late - as in outside the 2017 counting period window, albeit after the new annual count/year-long counting window kicked in ... starting with the 2018 class (Not the 2017 class that he was a part of). There were 5 EEs last year)2017) and 3 EEs in 2016 (when not all the 25 were used either, adding to the cumulative back counter credit carryforward. And transfers not previously on scholarship count but transfers previously on scholarship are NOT "initial counters" and do not count against the annual cap limit of 25 initial counters. They do count against the overall cap limit of 85 counters which is cumulative with initial/first time counters and prior counters, but that's a different cap limit.
quote:
They did not totally change the rule, they modified parts of it. They changed the counting window from a 5 month limited window to the entire year. They did not change the definition of "initial counter" - get your head wrapped around that.
Your mistake is that you think initial counters actually matter in this discussion. In this regard the compliance guy is guilty of using sloppy language too. As you point out initial counter is defined with specific meaning in the manual. The manual also states all the limits you mentioned. But there is one little problem. Because of a new rule, they don't count initial counters for this purpose.
Here is the new rule from a previous post: (15.5.1.9.1).What they count now are signings, not initial counters. Because initial counters can never be greater than the number of signings, the latter reaches the defined limit first and is thus controlling. In this context references to initial counter could be deleted from the manual (there may be a reason for it in other circumstances but that would take a thorough review).
There are only three exceptions in the new rule:
o if Lindsey Scott Jr returned to LSU, he wouldn't count because this would be his 2nd signing with LSU
o the 2+ year walk on
o The rare kid whose college career is over before he shows up due to some unfortunate circumstances. About 10 yrs or so ago LSU signed a kid who injured his neck. We kept him on scholarship. I think after he graduated he gave football a go and maybe played for the Saints.
They don't have 3 separate caps, only 2, the initial counters and overall counters.
Initial counters and signees are the same thing. It serves no purpose whatsoever to have 2 caps covering the same subject matter with the sole distinction being whether they sign or not. Initial signer, initial counter, are the same thing. Otherwise, it's a distinction without a difference. It's the only way to rationally harmonize both rules together that are otherwise inconsistent.
This post was edited on 1/23 at 6:34 pm
re: Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rulesPosted by Indiana Tiger
on 1/23/18 at 8:57 pm to cfmalloy

quote:
They don't have 3 separate caps, only 2, the initial counters and overall counters.
Here's 1 and 2:
quote:
15.5.6.1 Bowl Subdivision Football. [FBS] There shall be an annual limit of 25 on the number of initial counters (per Bylaw 15.02.3.1) and an annual limit of 85 on the total number of counters (including initial counters) in football at each institution. (Revised: 1/10/91 effective 8/1/92, 12/15/06)
And here's number 3:
quote:
15.5.1.9.1 Limitation on Number of National Letter of Intent/Offer of Financial Aid Signings—Bowl Subdivision Football. [FBS] In bowl subdivision football, there shall be an annual limit of 25 on the number of prospective student-athletes who may sign a National Letter of Intent or an institutional offer of financial aid and student-athletes who may sign a financial aid agreement for the first time. (Adopted: 1/16/10 effective 8/1/10, Revised: 1/14/12 effective 8/1/12, 4/26/17 effective 8/1/17 for signings that occur on or after 8/1/17)
quote:
It serves no purpose whatsoever to have 2 caps covering the same subject matter with the sole distinction being whether they sign or not.
This is true. Initial counters are now irrelevant and the rules could be changed to eliminate them.
quote:
Initial signer, initial counter, are the same thing. Otherwise, it's a distinction without a difference. It's the only way to rationally harmonize both rules together that are otherwise inconsistent.
They are and they aren't the same thing. All initial counters must be signers, but not all signers are initial counters. Initial counters are a subset of signer. While the two could be exactly the same, they don't have to be. There is no inconsistency; just makes one irrelevant. This does no harm...well except for the constant bull shite from big brained arrogant ignorants. I understand not accepting my opinion, but the compliance guy does this for a living and that doesn't give you a moments pause that you might just be mistaken? My Lord..
Popular
Back to top
