Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rules

Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:00 am
Posted by whitefoot
Franklin, TN
Member since Aug 2006
11181 posts
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:00 am
Cliffs:
25 player "hard cap" is a myth. As many of us have been saying, there was no change in the ability to back count early entrants.

All transfers count against the 25 (transfers, grad transfers, etc).

Dandy Don’s Q&A with Blair Napolitano on 25-Signing Cap, Transfers, Walk-ons, and More
Posted by Captain Crown
Member since Jun 2011
50635 posts
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:07 am to
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
35348 posts
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:27 am to
If anyone is wondering, LSU only has 4 spots remaining for this year, as most of us already knew. From the article....

quote:

Dandy Don: LSU signed 21 players in the early signing period, including graduate transfer kicker Cole Tracy. How many more players can LSU sign in this 2018 class?

Napolitano: Four. LSU used all of its allotted 25 slots for the 2017 signing class.

 
Dandy Don: What are the rules pertaining to signing more than 25 and have they changed? In the past, teams could sign more than 25 initial counters per year by back-counting early enrollees to the previous class if that class had not signed its full 25. Can this still be done, or is back-counting in this way no longer allowed since the rule changes in April?

Napolitano: A school can sign more than 25 recruits provided it did not use all 25 signing slots in the previous signing class. In order to be counted in the previous signing class, the signee has to enroll at mid-term and replace a current student-athlete that graduated in December or the previous academic year. There is a change in the rules. Athletes who sign in a particular class are locked into that signing class whether or not they enroll in that fall. Schools can no longer count gray shirts or players placed in junior colleges in future signing classes once they sign the letter of intent with a particular group. 

This post was edited on 1/22/18 at 11:28 am
Posted by Awesome All Day
Plaquemine, La
Member since Jul 2011
782 posts
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:35 am to
quote:

A school can sign more than 25 recruits provided it did not use all 25 signing slots in the previous signing class.


According to ESPN, LSU only signed 23 last year. So why couldn't we sign 27 this year if they can still back count?
This post was edited on 1/22/18 at 11:37 am
Posted by oauron
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2011
14509 posts
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:36 am to
quote:

According to ESPN, LSU only signed 23 last year. So why couldn't we sign 27 this year if they can still back count?


No, because LSU accepted two transfers. Those count to the class from last year.
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60246 posts
Posted on 1/22/18 at 11:38 am to
quote:

According to ESPN, LSU only signed 23 last year. So why couldn't we sign 27 this year if they can still back count?



Texas Tech Guys Giles and Fehoko?
This post was edited on 1/22/18 at 11:39 am
Posted by Lsu70123
Member since Sep 2017
282 posts
Posted on 1/22/18 at 12:05 pm to
Dandy Don is a good guy!
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4057 posts
Posted on 1/22/18 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

Texas Tech Guys Giles and Fehoko?

plus Moss.
Posted by TigersFan64
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2014
4755 posts
Posted on 1/22/18 at 1:24 pm to
Dandy Don is a good guy.
Posted by whitefoot
Franklin, TN
Member since Aug 2006
11181 posts
Posted on 1/22/18 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

According to ESPN, LSU only signed 23 last year. So why couldn't we sign 27 this year if they can still back count?

We had 24 players in last year's class. I'm not sure who ESPN is omitting, but it's either Seth Stewart (quit after a couple of days on campus) of Justin Jefferson (signed late in the summer).

Then, we added three transfers: Moss, Feheko and Giles.

So that's 27 initial counters for the 2017-2018 year. Apparently that was our maximum.
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
12369 posts
Posted on 1/22/18 at 4:56 pm to
I know this guy is supposed to be one that knows but I still believe hes incorrect about the transfers. I've poured over many articles and explanations, while also reading the rule numerous times and the way he explains the transfers as initial counters is not how the rule reads. A kid can't be an initial counter at multiple schools. If he is correct then the word initial needs to be removed from the term. The kicker was an initial counter because he had never been on scholarship. Therefore he is being "counted" for the first time or initially.
Posted by whitefoot
Franklin, TN
Member since Aug 2006
11181 posts
Posted on 1/22/18 at 5:01 pm to
I also thought that what you're saying was correct, but I now think I was wrong. Looking back, the language in the rulebook is ambiguous at best, and I always just assumed it meant what you're saying.
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4057 posts
Posted on 1/22/18 at 6:53 pm to
The ambiguity in the rule is due to our minds wanting to justify something different; not the rule itself. Take your bitch for example:
quote:

A kid can't be an initial counter at multiple schools. If he is correct then the word initial needs to be removed from the term. The kicker was an initial counter because he had never been on scholarship. Therefore he is being "counted" for the first time or initially.


It is manifestly obvious that the rule is written from the perspective of an individual school. The limit is 25, not 3200 or whatever 25 times the number of FBS schools is. If the rule meant to exclude someone who signed anywhere else, it would have to say anywhere else like it explicitly does for walk ons of 2+ years.

The rule is pretty clear when you get your head straight. Anyone who signs a promise of or an award of a scholarship counts, except for those explicitly excluded.
This post was edited on 1/22/18 at 6:56 pm
Posted by cfmalloy
Member since Apr 2017
97 posts
Posted on 1/23/18 at 1:12 am to
quote:

Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rules by lsufanva

I know this guy is supposed to be one that knows but I still believe hes incorrect about the transfers. I've poured over many articles and explanations, while also reading the rule numerous times and the way he explains the transfers as initial counters is not how the rule reads. A kid can't be an initial counter at multiple schools. If he is correct then the word initial needs to be removed from the term. The kicker was an initial counter because he had never been on scholarship. Therefore he is being "counted" for the first time or initially.





Correct, I agree. Absolutely.

Plus, Seth Stewart withdrew before the season started, he gets to be replaced, and Jefferson signed late - as in outside the 2017 counting period window, albeit after the new annual count/year-long counting window kicked in ... starting with the 2018 class (Not the 2017 class that he was a part of). There were 5 EEs last year)2017) and 3 EEs in 2016 (when not all the 25 were used either, adding to the cumulative back counter credit carryforward.

And transfers not previously on scholarship count but transfers previously on scholarship are NOT "initial counters" and do not count against the annual cap limit of 25 initial counters. They do count against the overall cap limit of 85 counters which is cumulative with initial/first time counters and prior counters, but that's a different cap limit.
This post was edited on 1/23/18 at 1:25 am
Posted by cfmalloy
Member since Apr 2017
97 posts
Posted on 1/23/18 at 1:29 am to
quote:

Dandy Don clearing up the new signing rules by Indiana Tiger

The ambiguity in the rule is due to our minds wanting to justify something different; not the rule itself. Take your bitch for example: 

quote:
A kid can't be an initial counter at multiple schools. If he is correct then the word initial needs to be removed from the term. The kicker was an initial counter because he had never been on scholarship. Therefore he is being "counted" for the first time or initially. 


It is manifestly obvious that the rule is written from the perspective of an individual school. The limit is 25, not 3200 or whatever 25 times the number of FBS schools is. If the rule meant to exclude someone who signed anywhere else, it would have to say anywhere else like it explicitly does for walk ons of 2+ years. 

The rule is pretty clear when you get your head straight. Anyone who signs a promise of or an award of a scholarship counts, except for those explicitly excluded.





They did not totally change the rule, they modified parts of it. They changed the counting window from a 5 month limited window to the entire year. They did not change the definition of "initial counter" - get your head wrapped around that.
Posted by Fisherchef Jeff
Ohio
Member since Dec 2014
110 posts
Posted on 1/23/18 at 6:02 am to
I’ll take em against the count any day
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4057 posts
Posted on 1/23/18 at 7:31 am to
quote:

Correct, I agree. Absolutely. Plus, Seth Stewart withdrew before the season started, he gets to be replaced, and Jefferson signed late - as in outside the 2017 counting period window, albeit after the new annual count/year-long counting window kicked in ... starting with the 2018 class (Not the 2017 class that he was a part of). There were 5 EEs last year)2017) and 3 EEs in 2016 (when not all the 25 were used either, adding to the cumulative back counter credit carryforward. And transfers not previously on scholarship count but transfers previously on scholarship are NOT "initial counters" and do not count against the annual cap limit of 25 initial counters. They do count against the overall cap limit of 85 counters which is cumulative with initial/first time counters and prior counters, but that's a different cap limit.

quote:

They did not totally change the rule, they modified parts of it. They changed the counting window from a 5 month limited window to the entire year. They did not change the definition of "initial counter" - get your head wrapped around that.



Your mistake is that you think initial counters actually matter in this discussion. In this regard the compliance guy is guilty of using sloppy language too. As you point out initial counter is defined with specific meaning in the manual. The manual also states all the limits you mentioned. But there is one little problem. Because of a new rule, they don't count initial counters for this purpose.

Here is the new rule from a previous post: (15.5.1.9.1). What they count now are signings, not initial counters. Because initial counters can never be greater than the number of signings, the latter reaches the defined limit first and is thus controlling. In this context references to initial counter could be deleted from the manual (there may be a reason for it in other circumstances but that would take a thorough review).

There are only three exceptions in the new rule:

o if Lindsey Scott Jr returned to LSU, he wouldn't count because this would be his 2nd signing with LSU

o the 2+ year walk on

o The rare kid whose college career is over before he shows up due to some unfortunate circumstances. About 10 yrs or so ago LSU signed a kid who injured his neck. We kept him on scholarship. I think after he graduated he gave football a go and maybe played for the Saints.
Posted by cfmalloy
Member since Apr 2017
97 posts
Posted on 1/23/18 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

Posted by Indiana Tiger on 1/23/18 at 7:31 am to cfmalloy

quote:
Correct, I agree. Absolutely. Plus, Seth Stewart withdrew before the season started, he gets to be replaced, and Jefferson signed late - as in outside the 2017 counting period window, albeit after the new annual count/year-long counting window kicked in ... starting with the 2018 class (Not the 2017 class that he was a part of). There were 5 EEs last year)2017) and 3 EEs in 2016 (when not all the 25 were used either, adding to the cumulative back counter credit carryforward. And transfers not previously on scholarship count but transfers previously on scholarship are NOT "initial counters" and do not count against the annual cap limit of 25 initial counters. They do count against the overall cap limit of 85 counters which is cumulative with initial/first time counters and prior counters, but that's a different cap limit.


quote:
They did not totally change the rule, they modified parts of it. They changed the counting window from a 5 month limited window to the entire year. They did not change the definition of "initial counter" - get your head wrapped around that. 


Your mistake is that you think initial counters actually matter in this discussion. In this regard the compliance guy is guilty of using sloppy language too. As you point out initial counter is defined with specific meaning in the manual. The manual also states all the limits you mentioned. But there is one little problem. Because of a new rule, they don't count initial counters for this purpose. 

Here is the new rule from a previous post: (15.5.1.9.1).What they count now are signings, not initial counters. Because initial counters can never be greater than the number of signings, the latter reaches the defined limit first and is thus controlling. In this context references to initial counter could be deleted from the manual (there may be a reason for it in other circumstances but that would take a thorough review). 

There are only three exceptions in the new rule: 

o if Lindsey Scott Jr returned to LSU, he wouldn't count because this would be his 2nd signing with LSU 

o the 2+ year walk on 

o The rare kid whose college career is over before he shows up due to some unfortunate circumstances. About 10 yrs or so ago LSU signed a kid who injured his neck. We kept him on scholarship. I think after he graduated he gave football a go and maybe played for the Saints.




They don't have 3 separate caps, only 2, the initial counters and overall counters.

Initial counters and signees are the same thing. It serves no purpose whatsoever to have 2 caps covering the same subject matter with the sole distinction being whether they sign or not. Initial signer, initial counter, are the same thing. Otherwise, it's a distinction without a difference. It's the only way to rationally harmonize both rules together that are otherwise inconsistent.
This post was edited on 1/23/18 at 6:34 pm
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4057 posts
Posted on 1/23/18 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

They don't have 3 separate caps, only 2, the initial counters and overall counters.

Here's 1 and 2:
quote:

15.5.6.1 Bowl Subdivision Football. [FBS] There shall be an annual limit of 25 on the number of initial counters (per Bylaw 15.02.3.1) and an annual limit of 85 on the total number of counters (including initial counters) in football at each institution. (Revised: 1/10/91 effective 8/1/92, 12/15/06)

And here's number 3:
quote:

15.5.1.9.1 Limitation on Number of National Letter of Intent/Offer of Financial Aid Signings—Bowl Subdivision Football. [FBS] In bowl subdivision football, there shall be an annual limit of 25 on the number of prospective student-athletes who may sign a National Letter of Intent or an institutional offer of financial aid and student-athletes who may sign a financial aid agreement for the first time. (Adopted: 1/16/10 effective 8/1/10, Revised: 1/14/12 effective 8/1/12, 4/26/17 effective 8/1/17 for signings that occur on or after 8/1/17)

quote:

It serves no purpose whatsoever to have 2 caps covering the same subject matter with the sole distinction being whether they sign or not.

This is true. Initial counters are now irrelevant and the rules could be changed to eliminate them.
quote:

Initial signer, initial counter, are the same thing. Otherwise, it's a distinction without a difference. It's the only way to rationally harmonize both rules together that are otherwise inconsistent.

They are and they aren't the same thing. All initial counters must be signers, but not all signers are initial counters. Initial counters are a subset of signer. While the two could be exactly the same, they don't have to be. There is no inconsistency; just makes one irrelevant. This does no harm...well except for the constant bullshite from big brained arrogant ignorants. I understand not accepting my opinion, but the compliance guy does this for a living and that doesn't give you a moments pause that you might just be mistaken? My Lord..
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram