- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Boom #1 *Disregard, Offical TD Talent Evaluator, NotAStarGazer says he won't start at LSU*
Posted on 3/10/24 at 1:47 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 3/10/24 at 1:47 pm to Lester Earl
Guy, you don't understand the term "explosive". 40 times are much more relevant to a LBer being explosive than 100 meter times. As another poster said, his highlights don't jump out at you....bbbeeccccaaauuusssseee, he isn't explosive. Looks like a decent college prospect but being the #5 LBer in Texas, the #40 player in Texas, and with weak offers proves my point.
Posted on 3/10/24 at 1:49 pm to BayouCowboy
And BTW, it wasn't just 4 minutes of highlights. It was from evaluations of multiple recruiting sites and over 100 college football programs...most of which haven't even offered him a scholarship. 

Posted on 3/10/24 at 1:53 pm to atxfan
quote:
Damone Clark was a speedy LBer who saw a lot of growth under Baker. Who is to sat this kid doesn't develop as well?
First, it is irrelevant to compare a young prospect to a player who now has an LSU and NFL history. We could use that type of analogy ad infinitum. Second, I didn't say I was placing a wager on his future performance. Hence I used the "JMHO". But for "highlights" they were pretty darn meh.
Posted on 3/10/24 at 1:54 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
. As another poster said, his highlights don't jump out at you....bbbeeccccaaauuusssseee, he isn't explosive.
Because all you idiots have the Harold Perkins rushing the passer syndrome. You think there is no impact being made unless they are coming down hill.
Watch his highlights again. His first 10 or so highlights, he either gets his hands on the ball (INT, or batted pass), or he is turning around running in coverage.
The best LB's in modern football are able to play outside the hash. West Weeks and Tyler Grubbs definitely aren't doing that

That skillset is way more valuable then being the best athlete on the field and just running after the QB like Cobbins, for instance. Or Harold Perkins as a freshman.
The best is yet to come for Ross. You recruit traits. The Jr film just so happens to be good, too. You just don't know what you are watching
Posted on 3/10/24 at 2:09 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Watch his highlights again. His first 10 or so highlights, he either gets his hands on the ball (INT, or batted pass), or he is turning around running in coverage.
The best LB's in modern football are able to play outside the hash. West Weeks and Tyler Grubbs definitely aren't doing that . Whit Weeks, while instinctual, was lost outside the hash marks as a Fresh (hint, he can't run like this guy and isn't strong enough to shed blockers, either).
That skillset is way more valuable then being the best athlete on the field and just running after the QB like Cobbins, for instance. Or Harold Perkins as a freshman.
The best is yet to come for Ross. You recruit traits. The Jr film just so happens to be good, too. You just don't know what you are watching
First, I saw the batted passes...these videos are called "highlights" for a reason. I never mentioned Perkins so that comment is irrelevant to me. Whit Weeks can run sideline to sideline easily. I saw the athletic ability but you are right in that with the LSU defense this season, a LOT of guys were lost...not WW fault. Ross is definitely faster than Grubbs who tackles well but doesn't get to enough plays. I saw no proof BTW that Ross could shed blockers..or couldn't shed blockers. Once again, scholarship worthy but rated properly by the recruiting services and his offer sheet is for a very low 4* or 3* player...it simply is. As I said, he won't start an LSU game in his career but a decent player.
Posted on 3/10/24 at 2:15 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
And BTW, it wasn't just 4 minutes of highlights. It was from evaluations of multiple recruiting sites and over 100 college football programs...most of which haven't even offered him a scholarship.
Queen's offer list:
LA Tech
USF
USA
Indiana
Nebraska
Tulane
LSU
That's it.
Ark, Tenn, A&M, UF, Ole Miss and ASU all recruited him, but didn't offer. I guess his film didn't pop.

Posted on 3/10/24 at 2:19 pm to BayouCowboy
Once again, comparing a guy who proved out to be better than his offers (Queen or WR Jefferson for that matter) is irrelevant to this player. For every player you can find that was "underrated", I can supply you 20 names that were rated spot on.
Posted on 3/10/24 at 2:21 pm to catfish 62
quote:C'mon man.
Next Debo

This post was edited on 3/10/24 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 3/10/24 at 2:24 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
Once again, comparing a guy who proved out to be better than his offers (Queen or WR Jefferson for that matter) is irrelevant to this player. For every player you can find that was "underrated", I can supply you 20 names that were rated spot on.
LSU actually has a laundry list of high rated LBs that didn't pan out and lower ones that did.
I guess you "AreaStarGazer".

Posted on 3/10/24 at 2:27 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
Once again, scholarship worthy but rated properly by the recruiting services and his offer sheet is for a very low 4* or 3* player...it simply is. As I said, he won't start an LSU game in his career but a decent player.
dude, Get a grip.
He is 6'2" 205 and is running a 10.48, and able to play in space. You are calling him a backup before he even grows into his projection

Posted on 3/10/24 at 2:32 pm to Lester Earl
Right! Some people just talk crazy on here.
Posted on 3/10/24 at 2:34 pm to LSU1215
It's insane. Some kids have a hard cap to what they can become due to their athleticism, or lack thereof.
this kid is not that
this kid is not that

Posted on 3/10/24 at 2:44 pm to BackwardsLs
Can’t teach speed. Bk gets it
Posted on 3/10/24 at 2:55 pm to ColtRange
quote:
His offer list is pretty bad. Why do you think he is going to end up so high?
You probably said the same thing when billiot committed too
Posted on 3/10/24 at 2:58 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
I'll stick with my prediction he will never start an LSU game
Making this take before a kid has even played his sr is absolutely retarded
Posted on 3/10/24 at 3:09 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
He is 6'2" 205 and is running a 10.48, and able to play in space. You are calling him a backup before he even grows into his projection what a clown take
As to you calling him a future starter I assume after not having finished his HS career.

This post was edited on 3/10/24 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 3/10/24 at 3:13 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
As to you calling him a future starter I
Where?

quote:
just like 100+ colleges projected him with the vast majority not interested and all the recruiting services rating him where IMO he should be rated.

Posted on 3/10/24 at 3:13 pm to LSU1215
quote:
Right! Some people just talk crazy on here.
Or some people actually do their due diligence on players and aren't homers. And some of us don't depend on his 100m times but actually view football highlights, at least glance at the ratings, and also check out offers from schools. His offer sheet is light even for a low 4* rated guy. But I will give him this...if he has an offer from Yale, my guess is he can understand defensive schemes for sure.

Posted on 3/10/24 at 3:17 pm to NotaStarGazer
quote:
His offer sheet is light even for a low 4* rated guy.
All of this mean nothing
All of that goes out the window when these kids get on campus
I don’t know why yall continue to make posts like these
It’s impossible to project how a kid will develop 4 years from now.
Popular
Back to top
