Posted by
Message
jordan21210
USA Fan
Member since Apr 2009
9971 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
I saw it mentioned in a thread on reddit so I gave it a google, but Puma actually developed ‘boost’ first. They had partnered with BASF to develop and eventually patent it back in 2013 I think. Ultimately they terminated the partnership and Adidas partnered with BASF and produced Boost as we now know it. Puma sued Adidas over it a few years ago and there was some back and forth. Puma was calling theirs ‘NRGY’, but it looks like they’re now using ‘Hybrid Foam’ which is NRGY Foam injected with their Ignite foam which has been around a while.

I’m not big runner and didn’t really need shoes as my Mizunos have plenty life left, but I’ll try to report back once I get the Pumas.


Pedro
Wisc-Milwaukee Fan
the one and only
Member since Jul 2008
23054 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
I’m intrigued to see what you have to say about them. I’ve been in run specialty for a while but haven’t been around puma much.


BurtReynoldsMustache
Arkansas Fan
Member since Sep 2010
3484 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
Bought a pair of Brooks Revel 2 49.97. No tax, no shipping fee. Very similar to the Launch. jackrabbit.com


3nOut
Texas A&M Fan
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
15784 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
Been seeing those at Ross for $30. Just not in the market for anything new now but I tried them on and liked them.

Launches still doing you well?


3nOut
Texas A&M Fan
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
15784 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
quote:

Puma sued Adidas over it a few years ago and there was some back and forth.


Mostly unknown fact: Puma and Adidas were started by German brothers who split and started their own companies after WWII.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
BurtReynoldsMustache
Arkansas Fan
Member since Sep 2010
3484 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
Launches were retired at 350 but were pretty good. These have the same sole just a little heavier. I have to buy a new pair of shoes about every 1.5 months.


PeepleHeppinBidness
Ole Miss Fan
Manchester United Fan
Member since Oct 2013
3510 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
Next%s went full release today. Anybody jump on a pair?

Just checked the website - looks like there's plenty of stock left. So maybe no rush to get in on limited stock like with previous models


usc6158
Southern Cal Fan
Member since Feb 2008
27870 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
Bought a pair of the new Peg Turbos but bought an extra of the Flyknit 4% so holding off on the Next% until I burn through those.

The only thing they are missing that the current 4% has is a loop on the back to get them on quickly, which might make them a pain for triathlon. That's my only hesitation.

Nike really downplayed the release compared to the last 4%


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
jordan21210
USA Fan
Member since Apr 2009
9971 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
Got my Puma Hybrid Astros in today. Really like them so far. Run true to size but surprisingly narrow. Not uncomfortably narrow, just a nice snug locked down narrow. They are a bit on the heavy/chunky side, but with a foam sole that’s expected. Only gripe is the laces aren’t long enough to utilize the netfit custom lacing options. Once we’re in the clear of this stupid storm I’ll give them a test run. Expecting good things.


TigeRoots
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Oct 2008
6129 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
Anybody recommend the best site as far as ordering a few pairs of shoes and returning 2 of them after trying on/out? I am trying to decide between the NB FC Propel, NB Beacon V2, Peg Turbo 2 and to a lesser extent the Hoka Rincon. For daily type trainer as I'm retiring the Beacon v1.

I'd prefer to shop local, but my local shop doesn't have all of these and also I don't have much free time to drive across town to multiple stores.

Edit: Narrowed it down to the Turbo 2 and NB FC Propel and just went with Dick's as they are the only place online that had them both and I can return the ones that I don't want in store.
This post was edited on 7/14 at 6:54 pm


jordan21210
USA Fan
Member since Apr 2009
9971 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
Happy to report the Pumas are solid. I don’t have much to compare them to except for my Mizuno Wave Inspires but I ran about 2.5 miles in them yesterday (walked the remaining 1.5 bc it was too damn hot). Compared to the Mizunos, definitely a more cushioned ride, but that was to be expected. I swapped the laces to some longer ones so I could utilize the netfit. I’ll try to get some pictures later. The netfit is legit, can really customize for more lockdown or different foot shapes. Though I’ll say those with wide feet would not find these comfy. They aren’t super narrow, but they feel a tad more narrow than my Mizunos. They are also on the heavy side, so definitely a distance or everyday trainer shoe.

Overall verdict so far, I really really like these shoes. Taking into account I only paid around $60 for them makes them even better. I question the durability of the sole, so that’s TBD...everything else seems built to last.
This post was edited on 7/18 at 8:04 am


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
10
KCM0Tiger
Missouri Fan
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Nov 2011
11103 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
I'm an amateur runner (just a few miles on a few nights per week). I recently bought some New Balance Beacon V2's and tried them out last night. Love how lightweight they are, and they seem to be plenty comfortable. They snug down nice and tight as well. Only weird thing was it kind of felt like the bottom of the shoe was curved (like I was on rockers), but I got used to that after a couple miles. So far so good!


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
TigeRoots
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Oct 2008
6129 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
Should be a fun weekend. Plan is to test these both & return one to Dick’s. Of course the odds of that happening are slim now that they are in my hands. UPS guy showed up literally as I was walking out the door to work. Haven’t even tried either on.






1999
Miss. Valley St. Fan
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
21131 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
running warehouse. i believe they are pretty liberal on their return policy.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
BurtReynoldsMustache
Arkansas Fan
Member since Sep 2010
3484 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
New Balance says the Propel is supposed to be 7.1 oz per size 9. What does that picture say?


TigeRoots
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Oct 2008
6129 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
quote:

New Balance says the Propel is supposed to be 7.1 oz per size 9. What does that picture say?


I thought I read the same thing and was surprised when I put them on the scale and it read 9.5 (size 10). Looking around now though, I'm not sure where I saw that at. Immediately a slight deterrent as I prefer a lighter trainer ala the Beacon which is around 7.2 IIRC.
This post was edited on 7/18 at 6:43 pm


BurtReynoldsMustache
Arkansas Fan
Member since Sep 2010
3484 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
quote:

I'm not sure where I saw that at.


It's on the New Balance website.


TigeRoots
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Oct 2008
6129 posts

re: tOfficial Running Shoe Thread
quote:

It's on the New Balance website.


Ah, interesting. I miss typed earlier, but the weight is actually 9.5.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
00
Jump to page
Page First 17 18 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 19 of 19next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top

logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram