Started By
Message

Study: Low volume exercise is as effective for strength and endurance as high volume

Posted on 9/24/18 at 4:58 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98083 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 4:58 pm
But high volume exercise increases muscle hypertrophy

Thoughts?

LINK

quote:

Format: Abstract

Send to
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Aug 28. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001764. [Epub ahead of print]
Resistance Training Volume Enhances Muscle Hypertrophy.
Schoenfeld BJ1, Contreras B2, Krieger J3, Grgic J4, Delcastillo K1, Belliard R1, Alto A1.
Author information
Abstract
PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate muscular adaptations between low-, moderate-, and high-volume resistance training (RT) protocols in resistance-trained men.
METHODS:

Thirty-four healthy resistance-trained men were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 experimental groups: a low-volume group (1SET) performing 1 set per exercise per training session (n = 11); a moderate-volume group (3SET) performing 3 sets per exercise per training session (n = 12); or a high-volume group (5SET) performing 5 sets per exercise per training session (n = 11). Training for all routines consisted of three weekly sessions performed on non-consecutive days for 8 weeks. Muscular strength was evaluated with 1 repetition maximum (RM) testing for the squat and bench press. Upper-body muscle endurance was evaluated using 50% of subjects bench press 1RM performed to momentary failure. Muscle hypertrophy was evaluated using B-mode ultrasonography for the elbow flexors, elbow extensors, mid-thigh and lateral thigh.
RESULTS:

Results showed significant pre-to-post intervention increases in strength and endurance in all groups, with no significant between-group differences. Alternatively, while all groups increased muscle size in most of the measured sites from pre-to-post intervention, significant increases favoring the higher volume conditions were seen for the elbow flexors, mid-thigh, and lateral thigh.
CONCLUSION:

Marked increases in strength and endurance can be attained by resistance-trained individuals with just three, 13-minute weekly sessions over an 8-week period, and these gains are similar to that achieved with a substantially greater time commitment. Alternatively, muscle hypertrophy follows a dose-response relationship, with increasingly greater gains achieved with higher training volumes.

PMID:
30153194
DOI:
10.1249/MSS.0000000000001764
Posted by stout
Smoking Crack with Hunter Biden
Member since Sep 2006
167034 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 5:12 pm to
I thought this had been the consensus for a while now?
Posted by Rep520
Member since Mar 2018
10406 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 5:16 pm to
It's interesting, but I'm not sure it accounts for all factors.

Generally, research also indicates larger muscles have greater strength potential.

LINK /

As the article indicates, this is particularly true the further from beginning a lifter gets.

That tends to support the traditional block programming focusing on hypertrophy for a period and then cutting volume and ramping intensity to peak.

Interesting study though. The more specificity is understood abojt overall volume, the better training plans get.
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22151 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 5:30 pm to
This is what I've known for a long time

Volume = mass
Intensity = strength
Mass allows higher ceiling for strength
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
30942 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 6:20 pm to
quote:


Volume = mass
Intensity = strength
Mass allows higher ceiling for strength


Pretty much only thing I would add, if you are taking in significant calories and protein

Gains in strength= gains in mass
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22151 posts
Posted on 9/24/18 at 6:35 pm to
Yep, it's a cycle
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
18372 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 8:13 am to
Depends on what and how you train. Olympic lifters aren’t all that big, but they can clean and press ungodly weight.

But I’ve always thought volume was for size and intensity was for strength. They compliment each other, though.
Posted by Rep520
Member since Mar 2018
10406 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 10:04 am to
Relative to the volume for hypertrophy discussion, I've always thought this is a fantastic resource.

LINK /

It covers bodypart to bodypatt with upper and lower limits for volume relative to hypertrophy. Israetel has some really good stuff.
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22151 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Olympic lifters aren’t all that big, but they can clean and press ungodly weight.



Yeah but they have weight classes and use leverages. They don't want mass as it's harder to move. There is a reason the term "lb for lb" exists. The biggest person had the largest ceiling for strength.
This post was edited on 9/25/18 at 10:13 am
Posted by DeafJam73
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
18372 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

There is a reason the term "lb for lb" exists. The biggest person had the largest ceiling for strength.


I completely agree, but you have to hand it to the smaller guys. They can move some weight. Explosively, too.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
30942 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 3:25 pm to
absolutly. But if you look at most olympic lifters and their programs, they lack density or any other movements besides the main lifts. THey aslo restrict calories.

in the end all of the volume doesnt matter for hypertrophy. Its a matter of density using the highest intensity possible. or essentially time under tension mutiplied by intensity.
Posted by Ric Flair
Charlotte
Member since Oct 2005
13649 posts
Posted on 9/25/18 at 6:28 pm to
Training to failure every set? Near failure?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram