- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Semaglutide injections
Posted on 12/8/25 at 12:30 pm to lsu777
Posted on 12/8/25 at 12:30 pm to lsu777
quote:
long term too and we know this.
Disagree
quote:
you know how long its been in use
Less time than completely safe MRNA vaccines
quote:
today is more about love mingo. you may drive me crazy sometimes, but no more arguing from me with you. Really hope you and your family have an amazing christmas. Enjoy the younger years, really are magical.
It’s all good to disagree, no sweat off either of our backs. I just appreciate you not being a pussy and able to have discourse unlike most of the imbeciles and snowflakes on this board
This post was edited on 12/8/25 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 12/8/25 at 12:34 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Less time than completely safe MRNA vaccines
one is a peptide of a hormone you already have in your body, one creates a spiked protein
totally different.
thats like saying...those that have a higher level of GLP produced naturally are suddenly at risk compared to those with low levels. We know that isnt true.
now im not condoning how it is prescribed dosage wise or anything of the sort. or the way its abused any of that shite.
we are prolly in agreement there.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 5:31 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
No one has argued that people don’t lose weight when taking them
So fricking stupid
Yes you are fricking stupid.
. No other health benefits right? Just weight loss, right?
Posted on 12/8/25 at 5:43 pm to TigerGman
quote:
No other health benefits right? Just weight loss, right?
Most if not all of the benefits are from the weight loss itself, so no, not really
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:50 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Most if not all of the benefits are from the weight loss itself, so no, not really
Then why don't either of you cucks ever mention them?
Posted on 12/9/25 at 8:29 am to TigerGman
quote:
TigerGman
quote:
Then why don't either of you cucks ever mention them?
Below is what you posted earlier in this thread:
quote:
So losing fat, lowering Cardio vascular risks & strokes, getting blood sugar down, reducing blood pressure, and reducing inflammation
Nobody needs GLP-1's to do that. Can be done with basic diet and exercise regimen. But you have to actually put in a little effort to do that and vast majority on here are lazy unhealthy fat fricks that think eating Chick-fil-a is 'healthy' and downing grams and grams of fiber a day is solution for healthy gut and bowel movements. So, Mingo is absolutely right when he says the benefits are from the weight loss itself.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 8:36 am to TigerGman
quote:
Then why don't either of you cucks ever mention them?
Because the pharmaceutical intervention doesn’t cause them.
I can’t make you stop taking your fat shots, I’m not sure why you’re so emotional. Maybe you should add an anti depressant to your cocktail too
Posted on 12/9/25 at 8:53 am to Mingo Was His NameO
Zempin
Liftin like a high schooler
Down 66lbs as of this morning
H8erz can

Liftin like a high schooler
Down 66lbs as of this morning
H8erz can

Posted on 12/9/25 at 9:43 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Because the pharmaceutical intervention doesn’t cause them
it does cause some. there are some things it specifically does to help health. but those benefits for the most part can be achieved by minimum effective dose and using it to control cravings and get below 12% bf.
Reta specifically has more health benefits than Tirz or semaglutide. but all have heart health pros to them
also help with addiction
but in the end...almost all of it could be achieved with diet and exercise. not all but most.
but why care what others do? People are so weird with this on both sides. The guys for GLP1 encourage the frick out of their use, those against it, bad mouth it to no end.
pros and cons for both, just like most things.
Now the people against it are 100% right, it is being abused. but personally I dont GAF, if you want to use it, are paying for it yourself and understand how to use it responsibly...use it.
I agree with you mingo about insurance paying for it and driving up cost across the board.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 9:49 am to lsu777
quote:
but why care what others do?
Because what others do affects us
quote:
Now the people against it are 100% right, it is being abused. but personally I dont GAF, if you want to use it, are paying for it yourself and understand how to use it responsibly...use it. I agree with you mingo about insurance paying for it and driving up cost across the board.
The next logical step is it’s going to be approved by the FDA and be THE intervention for the fats. And the taxpayer and non fats are going to start subsidizing it. Think past today
Posted on 12/9/25 at 10:31 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
The next logical step is it’s going to be approved by the FDA and be THE intervention for the fats. And the taxpayer and non fats are going to start subsidizing it. Think past today
ok so what happens if we find out that GLP levels are low from birth in those that are obese and that is what causes them to overeat and have food noise?
similar to how low testosterone(though it is abused) is treated with TRT....should that not be covered? just wondering
Posted on 12/9/25 at 10:34 am to lsu777
quote:
ok so what happens if we find out that GLP levels are low from birth in those that are obese and that is what causes them to overeat and have food noise?
Then I’ll change my mind. But there’s zero indication of that on a large scale.
quote:
similar to how low testosterone(though it is abused) is treated with TRT....should that not be covered?
If it’s medically needed. Just like any other intervention.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 10:38 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Then I’ll change my mind. But there’s zero indication of that on a large scale.
quote:
If it’s medically needed. Just like any other intervention.
ok yea we are in 100% agreement. Right now my opinion is GLP levels are low in the obese because the signal is getting over ruled by the choices of the individual and eventually the body suppresses levels due to getting feedback that the high levels are not needed.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 6:37 pm to ronricks
quote:
But you have to actually put in a little effort to do that and vast majority on here are lazy unhealthy fat fricks that think eating Chick-fil-a is 'healthy' and downing grams and grams of fiber a day is solution for healthy gut and bowel movements.
So you agree taking the medication results in all those benefits. You're just pissed that you put in all that hard work and now pretty much any "lazy unhealthy fat frick" can just take a shot and get good results"
Posted on 12/9/25 at 6:47 pm to TigerGman
quote:
So you agree taking the medication results in all those benefits.
No
quote:
You're just pissed that you put in all that hard work and now pretty much any "lazy unhealthy fat frick" can just take a shot and get good results"
I can only speak for myself, and say it plainly so many times, I could not give a shite less about this. All of my concerns are centered about the pharmaceutical industrial complex in this country and the ACTUAL health and wellness of Americans
This post was edited on 12/9/25 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 12/9/25 at 8:59 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
dup, delete
This post was edited on 12/9/25 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 12/9/25 at 9:00 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
ACTUAL health and wellness of Americans
I dated a girl in college whose mom died of breast cancer in her early 40s (this was 25 years ago.) Her entire female line was predisposed to breast cancer. One of the easiest (for college kids) ways to reduce risk was to be physically active, which I pointed out. She wasn't fat, but refused to even walk (outside of walking to class) as exercise.
Now she's fat, married a fat husband, and has fat kids (I only looked for purposes of this thread.) She increased her own cancer risk through her actions and choices. She probably expects Blue Cross to spend $500k to save her when she eventually gets cancer, when she could have ... fricking made better choices. And she's about at the age where her mom died. How many more ways can the universe warn your arse, and you do nothing?
Posted on 12/9/25 at 9:08 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
All of my concerns are centered about the pharmaceutical industrial complex in this country and the ACTUAL health and wellness of Americans
? Ugh what? Your only concern about their health and welfare is if they address their issues the way YOU insist on.
Otherwise you wouldn't be on here ranting and raving about these meds 24/7, you'd be on here applauding them for making Americans much healthier...
This post was edited on 12/9/25 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 12/9/25 at 9:10 pm to TigerGman
quote:
Your only concern about their health and welfare is if they address their issues the way YOU insist on.
Because I think the alternative may be dangerous
You can disagree with me, that’s ok. 777 kind of does and we’ve had good discourse about it. But you’re too fricking stupid to even understand the basis of the argument. Truly a retard, and I feel bad for you. Fat and stupid is no way to go through life.
quote:
you'd be on here applauding them for making Americans much healthier...
I don’t fundamentally believe this is true…. Dumbass
This post was edited on 12/9/25 at 9:11 pm
Posted on 12/9/25 at 9:57 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
So you are a 100% all natural? No supplements of any kind? Bc research comes all the time disproving beliefs we have about supplements that we have used for years. So unless you are 100% natural. No supplements the you need to get off of your high horse and STFU!
Popular
Back to top


1





