Started By
Message

re: Playing Carter Plantation this weekend

Posted on 8/16/26 at 6:05 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
113273 posts
Posted on 8/16/26 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

The same reason Hole 1 is never a par 3.
Tchefuncte Country Ckub is Mickey Mouse with this. Feels so strange
This post was edited on 8/16/26 at 6:07 pm
Posted by The Johnny Lawrence
Member since Sep 2016
2234 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:24 pm to
The 9s were flipped, as stated. The old ending of short par 4, par 5, long par 4, par 3 with water, par 4 is much better than the current final stretch, imo. Also liked starting on 1 by the driving range and short game area.

The trees were thinned out probably 10 years ago to make it easier to see the golf course from the road, which I assume was intended to help lot sales. But there are a lot of shots now that are punch out from the trees that used to be lost balls. Used to feel like playing golf in the middle of the woods, and not in the middle of a neighborhood.

I think they did something with the current 6 with the landing area. Can't remember exactly what but remember it being slightly different.

Haven't played it in a bit, but don't think there have been many design changes other than that.




Posted by JimTiger72
LA
Member since Jun 2023
20373 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:21 am to
Just aaw this review online

quote:

Played Carter Plantation today, the greens are recovering and in good shape but the fairways and rough full of weeds and all types of different grass. The bunkers most unplayable with most no sand just mud in them. For the cost not worth playing at this time. They need to improve the conditions or lower the price. The conditions do not warrant a 100 bucks for this course. I do like the layout and the staff was amazing as always.
Posted by questionable
FL
Member since Apr 2008
1302 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 11:23 am to
Isn’t it always packed? That guy doesn’t understand supply and demand.

The reality is that a $100/rd golf course in 2026 is the equivalent of a $50/rd course 10 years ago. People think they should get pristine conditions for $100/rd, it’s laughable. Go check out Covington CC, absolute goat ranch and they can get $60/rd on the weekends no problem. Golf has boomed since Covid and you have to pay big bucks to get pristine conditions unfortunately.
Posted by BayMar
Member since Jun 2026
83 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 12:52 pm to
I understand supply and demand but the goal of golf courses shouldn't be to provide as little quality as possible for the price. $100 is very expensive for the area and its not unrealistic to expect a certain level of care for the course at that price. Maybe not pristine, but certainly very good conditions. If a course costs $100 per round and is always packed, they should be making plenty money to spend a little money on the proper herbicide and bunker maintenance. There is nothing wrong with holding a course and greenskeeper accountable for poor conditions.
Posted by double d
Amarillo by morning
Member since Jun 2004
17246 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 2:11 pm to
With the price of chemicals, that $100 round won't go far. I agree that most courses could do better with the conditions but with the improved conditions price to play will have to follow.
Posted by BradL13
Member since Sep 2017
53 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:00 am to
Course is in good shape, just played Sunday. Bunkers are fine and plenty soft sand other than hole 9 which has some hard sand in it. Our 4 some started at 9 and finished at 12:45 and we were stuck behind another 4 some.
Posted by R11
Member since Aug 2017
5860 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 2:08 pm to
I played in a tournament there back in May enjoyed it
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram