
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Elders Scroll VI: Sentinel
Posted on 10/30/26 at 3:38 pm to Roaad
Posted on 10/30/26 at 3:38 pm to Roaad
quote:
I remember enchanting was OP but crazy fun in Morrowind.
Don't remember why, just remember feeling that way.
Skyrim enchanting was boring and sanitized
It was a combination of two things. First, magic was incredibly powerful. You could do damned near anything, with levitation being the most obvious thing that got killed off. Second, you could stack enchantments. More specifically, you could enchant items with the ability to make your future enchantments more powerful, and you could do that loop infinitely. So a simple jump/feather-fall combo all of a sudden jump you across the map.
Even simple enchantments can be incredibly powerful with a bit of creativity combined with game-breaking stacking
Posted on 10/30/26 at 5:04 pm to sgallo3
quote:
Red dead redemption 2 isnt even a decade old.
1 exception doesnt make the rule.
This post was edited on 10/30/26 at 5:05 pm
Posted on 10/30/26 at 5:13 pm to Roaad
quote:
I am excited to see how they handle level ups, and I hope for the ability to turn off level scaling.
I like the idea of having to avoid areas that are too high, but when I fully level up, I want to feel like a God.
Yeah i agree games feel better when the world doesnt level up with you. It should never level down to your level at the bare minimum. Elden Ring didnt have enemy scaling and felt way better than games with it.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 5:18 pm to sgallo3
quote:
Yeah i agree games feel better when the world doesnt level up with you. It should never level down to your level at the bare minimum. Elden Ring didnt have enemy scaling and felt way better than games with it.
Turning off bandit scaling is a 100% necessary mod for Oblivion, in my opinion. Game is vastly worse without it.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 10:43 pm to Joshjrn
So it is the Louis CK joke.
Kids in school are told "you can be anything you want to be" (Morrowind enchanting)
In trade school they are told "you can be 8 things" (Skyrim enchanting)
Kids in school are told "you can be anything you want to be" (Morrowind enchanting)
In trade school they are told "you can be 8 things" (Skyrim enchanting)
Posted on 10/30/26 at 11:25 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
15 years since The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim was released
they should of fired todd and the rest for their incompetence.
games bugged to the max, no shits given, settling on their past success, and pushing stuff to back burner for shite projects.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 9:56 am to BottomlandBrew
quote:
hat's a valid fear, and one I have, but you'd think the Elder Scrolls template and lore are robust enough to avoid that. Like, all they have to do is make a new world, update some graphics, and create some new story lines. Gameplay and mechanics have been pretty similar across the series.
I don't disagree with any of this. If ESVI did end up bombing (behind Starfield), frankly, I think that would almost be it for Bethesda - it would require a major restructuring at the very least.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 10:12 am to Ace Midnight
quote:I appreciate your optimism
that would almost be it for Bethesda
If Sentinel somehow bombed (it won't), Microsoft would close Bethesda within a month.
If it isn't a generational hit, Bethesda is likely still done
ES6 has been in development since 2018. It has already been 8 years, for a single player game
GTA 6 also had a long development time, but they spent over a billion dollars on their game. . .they get that from loose change left around in the couch from Shark card sales
Bethesda doesn't have anything close to that.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 11:05 am to Roaad
quote:
Bethesda doesn't have anything close to that.
They can always sell Skyrim again (and again).
Posted on 10/31/26 at 11:12 am to Ace Midnight
Skyrim: Trump edition. . .You can only be white Nords sealing the borders and kicking out non-Nords
Skyrim: Talarico edition. . .You can only NOT be a straight male Nord. Nords and Nordic religions are inherently evil (Even if the PC pretends to worship them). Must start every conversation revealing your pronouns
Skyrim: Talarico edition. . .You can only NOT be a straight male Nord. Nords and Nordic religions are inherently evil (Even if the PC pretends to worship them). Must start every conversation revealing your pronouns
Posted on 10/31/26 at 3:30 pm to Roaad
Posted on 10/31/26 at 4:29 pm to Roaad
quote:
If it isn't a generational hit, Bethesda is likely still done
Fallout IP is currently printing them money, they aren't going anywhere. Doomsday scenario would be the fold anything that's not producing Fallout content, but they aren't closing.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 5:08 pm to BCLA
quote:
Fallout IP is currently printing them money, they aren't going anywhere.
They took fallout game dev from bethesda and gave it to Obsidian
Microsoft would just move the films division to anywhere else, and kick 76 up to Zenimax Online (they already do ESO)
Fallout doesn't make enough money to tank a lackluster ES game after the clusterfrick that was Starfield.
It is too big an IP, too long developing. . .and we have to assume astronomically expensive
Posted on 10/31/26 at 7:21 pm to Roaad
I think I am the only person on the planet that loved Starfield.
Posted on 10/31/26 at 8:12 pm to Roaad
quote:
They took fallout game dev from bethesda and gave it to Obsidian
This is how I know most of you only half arse read stuff before you post.
Obsidian is working on another Fallout spinoff. Fallout 5 is still Bethesda and is in pre production while Sentinel winds down.
quote:
think I am the only person on the planet that loved Starfield.
I'm with you. I think the scope was way more than they anticipated and they shouldn't have allowed the "Skyrim in space" narrative to go on like it did. They continue to improve on it and it's a really fun game IMO.
This post was edited on 10/31/26 at 8:29 pm
Posted on 11/1/26 at 10:54 am to sicboy
quote:And it was moved to Obsidian, as part of a restructuring from Microsoft. Cancelling basically all Obsidian projects.
This is how I know most of you only half arse read stuff before you post.
Obsidian is working on another Fallout spinoff.
The dev was to fall under Bethesda, but Xbox decided to put it on Obsidian.
The presumption is to have Bethesda focus on ES6, which we haven't seen anything from in 8 years of development.
Anyone that thinks Bethesda can tank a ES6 disappointing because "muh Fallout"
. . .well I laugh at thee in my best Bioware impression.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 11:03 am to BulldogXero
quote:I enjoyed parts of it
I think I am the only person on the planet that loved Starfield.
The game, as a product on the market, was a clusterfrick.
The main story was fricking horrid. The DLC were hot garbage, and anyone hinting at the contrary is delusional
There were some great quests, though. The Mantis one comes to mind.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 12:06 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
The Elder Scrolls VI: Sentinel has not officially confirmed its target platforms, though industry reports and Xbox's business strategy point to a release on Xbox Series X/S, PC, and Xbox Cloud Gaming.
good
Posted on 11/1/26 at 1:43 pm to Roaad
quote:
The dev was to fall under Bethesda, but Xbox decided to put it on Obsidian.
Only because they were desperate for Fallout content and didn't want to wait for Sentinel to wrap up and Fallout 5 to get under way.
When Microsoft had Obsidian and Bethesda under one roof, doing this seemed like a no brainer but no one ever pulled the trigger. That's on MS management.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 2:11 pm to sicboy
quote:So your contention is that they were unconcerned about the pace of development?
Only because they were desperate for Fallout content and didn't want to wait for Sentinel to wrap up
Because that would definitely be a take
8 years and nothing to show, so they remove a spinoff from them and give it to another dev. . .cancelling that devs entire slate.
That shows direction. They want both out there, but they want Bethesda focused SOLELY on the tentpoles, in this case that is obviously ES6. If the rush was just to get anything Fallout out there, ES be damned, having the bigger studio pausing ES6 to hammer out the spinoff is clearly the shrewder move.
quote:Perhaps, but not germaine to the point.
When Microsoft had Obsidian and Bethesda under one roof, doing this seemed like a no brainer but no one ever pulled the trigger. That's on MS management.
I have serious issues with Obsidian being directly under Bethesda, as we will never get anything as great or lore-consistent as New Vegas. I suspect NV2 will be more lockstep with 3&4, rather than NV.

Popular
Back to top



1












