Started By
Message

re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts

Posted on 11/22/14 at 11:39 am to
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70365 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 11:39 am to
When building a gaming PC that will also be used for powerful 3D modeling software, what should be the minimum storage capacity I look for in an SSD so I can install my operating system on the SSD and reduce load times?
This post was edited on 11/22/14 at 11:40 am
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 11:45 am to
I mean, minimum could be 60GB but wouldn't be enough to store much else besides OS and a few programs. Ideally, you'd want something to store OS, all programs, some games, and at least whatever 3D project you're working on at the time (would load much faster). You can get a 250GB SSD for under $100. I think that should be your absolute minimum starting point these days.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70365 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 11:46 am to
Ok, I selected a 240 GB one. I'm looking at video cards now. Any particularly exceptional values? I'm looking to stay under $700 (for the CPU no monitor) on this build.
Posted by LSU Coyote
Member since Sep 2007
56439 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 11:55 am to
quote:

They are definitely perfect steambox cards within the heat and power constraints. With the cost of waterblocks bringing the pair to $1400, probably not the best of upgrades from a 780 Ti.

Yeah, it isn't much more head room. I took my 780 Tis out of SLi and ran a few games and benches against my single 980 (was planning on getting a second), but it was barely marginal difference. Sometimes Big Kepler would stay a few frames ahead and other times Little Maxwell would perform a better.

Now I do want to point that Maxwell just "feels smoother" over the old Tis.

I will just be holding out for Big Maxwell for the main rig.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 12:35 pm to
Have you tested MFAA? I believe it's a maxwell-only feature. It reduces the GPU taxation of MSAA. Only works in a short list of games right now, like Far Cry 4.
Posted by DoUrden
UnderDark
Member since Oct 2011
26157 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Make sure you throw that qnix monitor to 120hz with that new setup!


120 was a no go, I am at 90 right now.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

I'm looking at video cards now. Any particularly exceptional values? I'm looking to stay under $700 (for the CPU no monitor) on this build.


Usually at that budget an SSD becomes slightly lower priority. You should try to squeeze in an R9-290, even if you have to get it used on ebay.
Posted by DoUrden
UnderDark
Member since Oct 2011
26157 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 12:38 pm to
Got this feedback from overclock.net, is it true?

quote:

I may be wrong but it looks like the CPU block is mounted sideways. This will not cool the cores properly because the slots in the block are sitting in the wrong direction.


shite it looks like they might be right!

This post was edited on 11/22/14 at 12:42 pm
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70365 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 12:39 pm to
Can the wisdom of this board please critique my build? This will be my first attempt at building a gaming PC that can also be used for 3D modeling.
big
budget

Obviously, I want the most value possible, but I'd really like to stay under $700 if possible. Please let me know what you think.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 1:04 pm to
I can't seem to find a picture of the underside of the block to tell you for sure, and I've never worked with these coolers before. I do see that every photo of it mounted shows it oriented like the pic above, so you may want to play it safe and remount.


That tubing in the above pic drives me nuts. That slightly kinked tube at the top just ruins it.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Can the wisdom of this board please critique my build? This will be my first attempt at building a gaming PC that can also be used for 3D modeling.



Based on the parts I'm assuming this is mostly 3d modeling, and gaming is just a secondary nice-to-have?
Posted by DoUrden
UnderDark
Member since Oct 2011
26157 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

That tubing in the above pic drives me nuts.



Yeah, the 2nd hardest part after mounting the cooler was getting the block on, it figures. I will take care of it when I re-run wires. Does it matter which is on top? I have seen the bottom pipe on top and bottom in pics.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70365 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Based on the parts I'm assuming this is mostly 3d modeling, and gaming is just a secondary nice-to-have?


Pretty much. The main games I want to be able to play are single player fantasy epics like Skyrim, The Sims franchise, and Total War series.

I plan on using the computer to design my dream home in autocad and revit as well as allow my SO to design projects in there in her spare time.

I'm also going to eventually fit the PC out to use as a music recording station. In the meantime, on the music side, it will be more for itunes and streaming internet radio.

Are there easy ways to hook the PC up to my TV without snaking an HDMI chord the whole way?
This post was edited on 11/22/14 at 1:11 pm
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 1:09 pm to
Looks like the logo is oriented right side up, so I'd go with that. Again, without looking at the bottom of the block I couldn't tell you whether it even needs to be remounted at all.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Pretty much. The main games I want to be able to play are single player fantasy epics like Skyrim, The Sims franchise, and Total War series.



What 3d modeling software are you going to use? That will make a big difference in CPU choice.

EDIT: just saw your edit above
This post was edited on 11/22/14 at 1:11 pm
Posted by DoUrden
UnderDark
Member since Oct 2011
26157 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Looks like the logo is oriented right side up


The logo is a top mounted piece that can be changed out for a different color (mine came with three) and can be installed either way so the logo isn't reliable. I will change it around so that the tubes are the least bent with top/bottom tubing.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 1:17 pm to
The pic with the shitty white tubing is actually on the support page on Swiftech's site, so that orientation is a safe bet.
Posted by LSU Coyote
Member since Sep 2007
56439 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Have you tested MFAA? I believe it's a maxwell-only feature. It reduces the GPU taxation of MSAA. Only works in a short list of games right now, like Far Cry 4.

No I haven't, just because my 980 is in the SteamBox. Just played the game with everything turned to 11 except MSAA is at x2 and not x4.

I locked my frames at 80 on the Swift because I couldn't stay above 100fps. None the less the damn game is well done and with the maturity of their GFX Engine, the experience is awesome... except for those damn hawks.

This is also at 1255MHz @ 1.255mV; if I ran at stock then the results wouldn't be so hot.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 1:46 pm to
quote:


Obviously, I want the most value possible, but I'd really like to stay under $700 if possible. Please let me know what you think.



I'm going to revise your "big" build and leave the budget one alone, as it's configured to do not much of anything all that well.

quote:

Intel Core i7-4790K 4.0GHz Quad-Core Processor

That's the first thing that needs to change. $700 for a 3d modeling/gaming rig is still considered low-budget, and an i7 seldom fits in this budget for a well-balanced rig. Furthermore, pretty much all games use 4 cores or less, so the hyperthreading will be a waste in most cases. Even in Revit, the list of multi-threaded functions is short. The important things in the software, based on what I've read, rely on single-threaded performance. An i5 is appropriate here.

quote:

Asus H81M-D PLUS Micro ATX LGA1150 Motherboard

You selected an unlocked (K) processor but then chose this motherboard. You only want a K processor if you intend to overclock, and if you intend to overclock, you should be getting a Z-series chipset board. However, your budget doesn't allow for either. We'll stick with a cheap board, but for the sake of keeping things less complicated, we'll go with an H97 chipset since H81 may or may not require a bios update to run a haswell refresh chip (never know which vendors have updated boards or not).

quote:

G.Skill Ripjaws X Series 8GB (1 x 8GB) DDR3-1866 Memory

There are cheaper kits that are dual channel and faster. Right now there's a pretty insane deal on some 2133 CL9 RAM... $64.99 with promo code. Ends 11/27.

quote:

EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB Superclocked Video Card

This is fine for extremely casual low-end gaming, but just be aware that for another $80 you'd get a new R9-280x that would be nearly double the performance. Revit doesn't care about GPU brand either, because it doesn't have GPU-accelerated rendering.

But anyway, here's what I'd do: LINK

It's just above $700 after rebates. Caveats are that I did not include the Blu-Ray burner. How important is it? I bought one years ago and can count on one hand how many blu-rays I burned and how many I actually watched. It's not practical unless you have a specific use (e.g., if you're a professional video editor who provides blu-ray media to clients). Also didn't include the speakers since I'm not the one to ask for speaker advice.

You can add those items back in by downgrading to the 750 Ti again if you must.
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 11/22/14 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

This is also at 1255MHz @ 1.255mV; if I ran at stock then the results wouldn't be so hot.


That's essentially stock with boost, but that voltage seems too high for those clocks. What's your ASIC?
Jump to page
Page First 966 967 968 969 970 ... 1912
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 968 of 1912Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram