- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts
Posted on 6/25/19 at 10:07 am to LSU Coyote
Posted on 6/25/19 at 10:07 am to LSU Coyote
quote:
I don't have Facebook, so that leaves me with Let Go?
Anything suggestions?
dude, Facebook Marketplace has been nothing but good for my area. I'd make one just to access it if I were you.
2
Posted on 6/25/19 at 10:09 am to finchmeister08
Yea that's where I find all my deals
Posted on 6/25/19 at 8:22 pm to finchmeister08
quote:
dude, Facebook Marketplace has been nothing but good for my area. I'd make one just to access it if I were you.
I have never created a FB account and never will..
Posted on 6/25/19 at 10:22 pm to LSU Coyote
but what if it's marketplace was filled with titties and beer and all the computer parts you could ever imagine at prices that could beat any rebate newegg would have?
Posted on 6/26/19 at 7:34 am to finchmeister08
Ryzen 5 3600 looks so promising:
LINK
Keep in mind that's a $199 chip. It's single core performance easily beats the 2700x (by 10%+), and is only 3-4% slower than 9900k. Also beats the 2700x in each gaming test, only by a little in some, but really impressive for a $199 chip with a base clock of 3.6ghz and boost of 4.2ghz.
LINK
Keep in mind that's a $199 chip. It's single core performance easily beats the 2700x (by 10%+), and is only 3-4% slower than 9900k. Also beats the 2700x in each gaming test, only by a little in some, but really impressive for a $199 chip with a base clock of 3.6ghz and boost of 4.2ghz.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 8:09 am to thunderbird1100
From the article
While the 9900k is 8, 10, and 25fps higher in the gaming benches mentioned in the article
quote:
Ryzen 5 3600 is shown to have posted excellent single-core scores and very good gaming performance surpassing the Ryzen 7 2700X and almost on par with the Intel Core i9-9900K.
While the 9900k is 8, 10, and 25fps higher in the gaming benches mentioned in the article
Posted on 6/26/19 at 8:31 am to bluebarracuda
86 vs. 80 in Assassin's Creed and 143.3 vs. 134.7 in Final Fantasy XV. Those aren't really that significant of a difference especially when you consider the 9900k is almost a $500 CPU while the 3600 is a $200 CPU, and the lowest end on the new Ryzen 3xxx stack (without IGP) with the lowest clocks.
Far Cry obviously heavily favors Intel CPUs and the ryzen gets crushed there.
What's going to be most interesting is seeing the whole product stack in gaming compared to intel counterparts among a ton of different games.
Far Cry obviously heavily favors Intel CPUs and the ryzen gets crushed there.
What's going to be most interesting is seeing the whole product stack in gaming compared to intel counterparts among a ton of different games.
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 6/26/19 at 8:56 am to thunderbird1100
7% and 13% difference isn't remotely close to being "on-par" though.
Still waiting to see more in-depth benches like 99%, low fps, etc throughout more games
Still waiting to see more in-depth benches like 99%, low fps, etc throughout more games
Posted on 6/26/19 at 9:34 am to bluebarracuda
It's a 3600...you are better than this. 
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 9:35 am
Posted on 6/26/19 at 9:45 am to UltimateHog
Making more of a point towards the poor journalism more than anything
Posted on 6/26/19 at 10:24 am to bluebarracuda
The idiotic 3600 comparison to 9900K?
Posted on 6/26/19 at 10:30 am to UltimateHog
You can't say one thing is on par with another when it's not even close to being truthful. Especially when you have the proof in your own article
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:17 pm to bluebarracuda
quote:
7% and 13% difference isn't remotely close to being "on-par" though.
The first two are only a 6.5-7.5% uplift from the 3600. The big difference is in Intel favored Far Cry 5 test.
They also said "almost" on par. So you're kind of arguing a little semantics here. 6-8% isn't a gigantic difference by any means.
Also take into account these aren't a X570 board, no telling how that might factor into things, especially with faster memory.
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:36 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Microsoft could be looking to replace Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) chips in its Surface devices, according to an unconfirmed report on Petri.com.
The report suggested the software giant is likely to host an event focused on Surface in the fall where it will announce major changes to the product lineup.
Microsoft could slowly transition from Intel, with which it has a decades-old relationship, and try out AMD and an ARM chip, according to Petri.com.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 12:54 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
They also said "almost" on par. So you're kind of arguing a little semantics here. 6-8% isn't a gigantic difference by any means.
Almost on par should be just about even or trade blows. 8% is a decent margin for FPS changes
Posted on 6/26/19 at 1:20 pm to bluebarracuda
They just shouldn't be comparing those models to begin with.
Posted on 6/26/19 at 1:28 pm to UltimateHog
quote:
They just shouldn't be comparing those models to begin with.
Truth.
Which is why I keep saying I'm going to wait until the NDA releases and can just get a big ole graph of goodness (especially seeing each sides scores after OCing)
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 6/26/19 at 1:49 pm to bluebarracuda
quote:
8%
is this worth the $300 price difference?
Posted on 6/26/19 at 1:54 pm to bluebarracuda
quote:
Almost on par should be just about even or trade blows. 8% is a decent margin for FPS changes
Trading blows would be on par, the reference is for "almost". I dont think that's out of line with a few benchmarks showing only a 6.5%-7.5% difference. Especially again when you consider the 3600 is gimped a little on the X470 board, with probably slow memory which can vastly affect performance. We're close to seeing big benchmark suites, but that stuff is pretty encouraging a $200 chip isn't really noticeably slower than a near $500 chip, even when the $200 chip is likely gimped a little on older hardware.
This post was edited on 6/26/19 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 6/26/19 at 4:26 pm to thunderbird1100
Question for you guys.
I just received an email from EVGA offering an upgrade program. They’re offering $100 to upgrade 780ti to a 20 series card. I have two 780ti just sitting in a box doing nothing. Does it make sense? I know it’s a huge upgrade from my 2X1080 cards. Just looking for viewpoints. I’d upgrade to a 2080ti if I do it and I’d want them to give me 2x$100 credits. TIA.
I just received an email from EVGA offering an upgrade program. They’re offering $100 to upgrade 780ti to a 20 series card. I have two 780ti just sitting in a box doing nothing. Does it make sense? I know it’s a huge upgrade from my 2X1080 cards. Just looking for viewpoints. I’d upgrade to a 2080ti if I do it and I’d want them to give me 2x$100 credits. TIA.
Page 1552 of 1912
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News